Quantcast
Channel: Siraj Syed's blog
Viewing all 1037 articles
Browse latest View live

CommunicAsia 2016, Preview, 3: Cyber Security

$
0
0

CommunicAsia 2016, Preview, 3: Cyber Security

According to the 2015 Breach Level Index1, there were almost 900 data breaches internationally resulting in close to 246 million records being compromised. Visit CommunicAsia2016 to source for solutions that will help you maintain and grow your company's reputation and bottom line as a telecommunication operator.

Why are Security & Cyber-Security important?

*To hedge against the possible threats with the deployment of SDN.

*For updating of trustworthy routes and secure networks to cope with the ever-changing environment

Vigilance is key and only multi-layered dynamic security measures will be able to protect your network.

The following products are on display at CommunicAsia 2016: 

DFRC's Face to Phone Predictive Security technology detects mobile devices in target areas, based on a small number of sensors capable of locating cellular and WiFi signals. This unique technology enables security applications from device tracking and location analytics, to face-to-phone matching based on integration with video analytics and access control system. 

SecurePair & SecureCom Mobile Messaging and Voice Apps delivered through enterprise white label solutions or downloaded via online application stores. SecureCom encrypts the mobile communication of the common cell phone and their apps are downloaded by consumers to their mobile devices. 

Network and security professionals need the ability to optimize, fix and protect their network's critical infrastructure and data. Using key event and alert information from the industry's leading IDS/IPS devices, Savvius Vigil is the industry's only appliance capable of intelligently selecting, capturing and storing weeks and months' worth of the suspicious network packets. 

Beamcaster is a brand of wireless optical networking solutions designed and manufactured by RiT Wireless. Beamcaster offers high-speed, secure data communication across indoor open spaces using class 1 FDA approved lasers and offers a credible alternative or complementary technology to existing Wi-Fi or wired optical network offerings


CommunicAsia 2016, Preview 2: Broadband

$
0
0

CommunicAsia 2016, Preview 2: Broadband

CommunicAsia 2016, Preview 2: Broadband

Latest broadband technology and devices will be on display at CommunicAsia 2016. Some of them are worlwide or Asia launches, and include:

ACRS2.5 is world's first 802.22 and 802.11x integrated TV White Space device. It provides excellent wireless connectivity due to UHF propagation characteristic and cognitive radio feature. ACRS2.5 simplifies the network infrastructure in providing last mile pervasive WiFi device's access.ACRS2.5 is used for connecting people and things to internet.

 

The Calix's new GigaCenters allow service providers to become part of the home and to leverage this strategic location all the way to the end users device for end-to-end visibility and delivery of advanced broadband services. GigaCenters are the first fibre products in the world to unleash the power of carrier class Wi-Fi in the home. 

INNO Instrument unveils new ARC fusion splicer line – View 1 and View 12R. View 1 is an active clad-alignment splicer with amazingly compact design while View 12R is the world's most accurate and fast ribbon splicer with the fully motorised clamp alignment system. 

The BreezeCOMPACT is a TD-LTE Advanced ready suite of all-outdoor base stations for fixed, nomadic and mobile wireless access, designed to achieve pervasive connectivity for both outdoor and indoor applications. Telrad's advanced base stations provide optimised coverage and capacity in a single, easy-to-deploy, small-footprint box. 

UHP-100 is a high-performance router designed specifically for large-scale deployment in broadband VSAT networks operating over HTS. It can process 200,000 IP packets per second, 210 Mbps of traffic and two 65 Msps carriers. 

WipAir's system is the latest in licensed and unlicensed point-to-point & point-to-multipoint broadband wireless solutions. With unprecedented dynamic asymmetric net throughput of 1000Mbps and ultra-low latency of 1ms, WipAir is the optimal solution for high capacity applications like IP and cellular backhauls, video surveillance and private networks.

 

 

Waiting, Review: Coma dilemma

$
0
0

Waiting, Review: Coma dilemma

Death is the only inevitable reality in life. It is also ‘the end’ that leaves the deceased at ‘eternal peace’, or at least at no risk of further physical or mental trauma, while family, friends and others who knew him/her, cope with the loss in a variety of ways. While it can be argued that some people cope with the event more objectively, the vast majority suffer great pain, even shock, of a magnitude that does not quite compare with anything in this world. Waiting is a look at two individuals who are not dead, at least not yet, but nor are they alive. They are in coma. And their spouses, a man and a woman, who can do little else, are just Waiting.

Death, suicide, and lately, euthanasia and coma, are such emotional, eternal, volcanoes that humans have no answers to them. Religions, nations and even NGOs have sharply differing views. In this context, the film is a bold effort. But realising that it cannot hope to provide convincing arguments in favour of one point of view or another, it chooses, instead, to dwell on how two contrasting personalities, with a generation gap to boost, approach their situations in dealing with comatose better halves, and, in the process, influence and befriend each other.

Young, outspoken, and impassioned Tara Deshpande (Kalki Koechlin), who works in advertising, receives tragic news: Her husband of only six weeks has slipped into a coma after a car accident in Kerala. She takes the first flight to be with him, only to find him in a really serious condition. Despondent and desperate for answers, in a situation where she has little control, Tara finds an unlikely friend in Shiv (Naseeruddin Shah), a gentle and hopeful man, who has become a regular in the hospital, where his wife has been in a coma for over 8 months. They can relate to each other deeply, both isolated from other support and waiting for an optimistic, miraculous outcome. However, as each reaches an important crossroad in caring for their spouses, Tara and Shiv realise that their fear of change is holding them back from making necessary decisions.

A pooled product of three writers, Waiting gives to the audience, among other bits of competent character delineating, three very well-etched characters—Shiv, Tara and Girish (Rajat’s company colleague, in the Kerala office). Others, too, are well-drawn out and blend seamlessly with the tableau. Two Indians and one British writer take credit: James Ruzicka is the a graduate of Cambridge University and the London Film School, he has written comedy for BBC Radio 4, film criticism for FilmExposed, and a number of feature film screenplays that are currently in development; Atika Chohan has worked with Yash Raj Productions as a writer on the popular TV series Rishta.com, started her career in Delhi as a journalist with The Hindu, and later worked with the news channel CNN-IBN, studied screen-writing at the Film and Television Institute of India, Pune, and has a Master’s degree in English Literature from Delhi University, last film: Margarita with a Straw. And, of course, the director, Anu Menon, co-wrote.

All three deserve kudos for piecing together a milieu where nothing sticks out like a sore thumb, and where strong personalities do not impose or inflict themselves, either on each other or on the viewers. There are, as in life, so many grey areas in the film, that it writes itself; the writer, or director, seems to be absent on occasions. Menon, now 40, has made only one feature film before this: London Paris New York, also about notably differing personalities. She made two well-received short films, Ravi Goes to School, and Baby, a documentary on a Bengali domestic help, who wrote a bestseller. Trained at the London Film School, Menon grew up in Delhi and worked in advertising in India as well as Singapore, before settling in London. NOT to be confused with Anu Menon, the comic VJ. Waiting is a film that can work many ways, though, in the end, that might turn out to be a disadvantage. It works as a black comedy, with many guilty chuckles. It works as a generation gap drama, a language and accent take-off, a case for acceptance of menstrual cycles as part of life and of marketing, supercilious and pretentious doctors in the Indian medical system, as a case for not keeping secrets from your spouse, as a warm, tender, platonic romance, between a lonely, 60ish man, facing ‘widower’hood and a 30ish woman, facing widowhood, barely out of a torrid honeymoon, ...

Getting Shah on board was major help, says Menon, and rightly so. Yes, the angled face, the slight shake of the head, left-to-right and vice versa, have all become signatures decades ago, but they still work. What is refreshing is that he plays a man who is strong about his convictions, yet extremely unsure about everything else, a most unlike Naseeruddin Shah part. It is a challenge for Koechlin (Dev D, Zindagi Na Milegi Dobara, Margarita with a Straw), as was Margarita with a Straw, and she does well. Why do they have to name her Tara Kapoor-Deshpande beats me. She tries hard, but just cannot pass off as Indian. If there was one actress who could convincingly portray a woman who teaches Naseer to start using the f word, it had to be Kalki. Rajeev Ravindranathan is a delight to watch and hear. As the senior doctor, Rajat Kapoor has a few moments, not too many though.

Waiting is interesting while it lasts its 98 minutes, at the end of which, it drops you just where it picked you up from. Some call it organic unity. Others might feel that this journey has led nowhere.

Rating: ***

Trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fhnbNJacdAQ

Alice through the Looking Glass, Review: It’s Hatter Time

$
0
0

Alice through the Looking Glass, Review: It’s Hatter Time

When the Mad Hatter meets Alice in Lewis Carroll’s first book, he says, “I’ve been stuck at this tea party since last March, when Time and I quarrelled.” Now, bring in the fertile imagination of a writer and a director, and you have created a brand new character, Time himself, worked out in great detail, and playing a pivotal part. Alice, Hatter, Time, Iracebeth, Hamish...Alice through the Looking Glass is replete with characters and actors who conjure two separate worlds, and three distinct time spans, with élan.

It is the mid 1850s. Alice Kingsleigh (Ben spells it differentley) has spent the past three years following in her father's footsteps, and sailing the high seas. Her latest foray is a hazardous voyage to China, where she brilliantly outwits pirates in the Straits of Malacca, bringing her ship safely home. Upon her return to London, she finds out that her ex-fiancé, Hamish Ascot, has taken over his father's company, which runs the ships, and plans to have Alice sell him over her father's ship, in exchange for her family home. Her mother has already sold off their 10% stake in the company. Hamish derisively offers her a job as a clerk in the company, which the brave ship-captain finds humiliating. After a fight with her mother on the matter, Alice follows a butterfly she recognises as Absolem, and returns through a mirror to Underland.

Alice is greeted by the White Queen (Mirana), the White Rabbit, the twin Tweedles, the Dormouse, Bayard and the now-you-see-me-now-you-don’t Cheshire Cat. They inform her that Tarrant Hightopp (Mad Hatter) is acting madder than usual, after he has stumbled on to something that suggests that his family, believed long dead, is still alive. He has not been opening his door to anyone, but Alice is special.  She finds that he is in a bad physical shape, and tries to console him, but he remains sure of his families’ survival of the Attack of the Jabberwocky. Convinced that finding the Hatter's family is the only way to stop his deteriorating health, the White Queen comes up with a plan that calls for Alice to consult Time himself, and convince him to save the Hatter's family, in the past. Upon visiting Time's palace, Alice finds the Chronosphere, an object that powers all time in Underland, and can travel through Time itself.

A genre specialist, Linda Woolverton (The Lion King, Alice in Wonderland, Maleficent) has written the screenplay, based on Lewis Carroll books, published in 1871, and set 20-30 years earlier. Woolverton juggles competently with science fiction (the whole Time track), fairy-tale (Wonderland, Underland, Mirrorland) and present-day adventures and class conflicts (the relevant real-time being the mid 1850s). There is a lot of humour too, sadly much of it lost in diction. In working out a script with the above elements, Woolverton has broadened the audience base, to include persons above 18, not the primary viewership of Alice stories. It does seem stretching things too far when you find that Iracebeth is Time’s mistress. And really, the whole Hatter matter is overdone.

Director James Bobin (The Muppets, Muppets Most Wanted) gives you a feast of colours and a festival of stunning CGI, in extreme close-ups, co-produced by Tim Burton. Alice through the Looking Glass takes off in a stunning sea-piracy sequence, much in the mould of the Pirates of the Caribbean. You do not see a single pirate, and yet, you are on the edge of your seat, as Alice’s ship almost keels over. Shot at Longcross, in Hampshire, on specially built, 200-foot gimbals, which could rock to one side by 90 degrees, eight, two-ton water dumps, and, huge fans (blowers). Bobin goes over-indulgent with Hatter, and the track lasts a little longer than what was good for it. Time is ingeniously captured. And Bobin succeeds in demarcating distinct realms, as the story demands, with great detail.

Mia Wasikowska (Alice in Wonderland, Madame Bovary, Crimson Peak) has unique features that lend themselves to any physical age and era in history. Moreover, she shows a lot of gusto and deep sentimentality, wherever required. Johnny Depp as the Hatter gets the footage he deserves, and is as stylised as ever, with his face and skin being used as a colour palette.  Imagine a dwarf, with triangular, red, fluffy hair behind a bald forehead, and carrying it off! That’s Helen Bonham-Carter (Iracebeth) for you. Permanently pained, with only occasional moments of normalcy, Anne Hathaway fits the bill. Matt Lucas plays the rotund twins, present mainly to impart humour. Sacha Noam Baron Cohen (Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan, The Dictator, Les Misérables) may as well be 2016’s Peter Sellers, and has a ball, prancing around in a clockwork range.

Rhys Ifans joins the party as Zanik Hightopp, the Mad Hatter’s father. Stephen Fry, Michael Sheen, Timothy Spall, Lindsay Duncan, Leo Bill and Geraldine James render good support. Alan Rickman is the voice of Absolem, the Butterfly, and you will hear him mouth very few lines. Rickman died in January this year.

Alive through the Looking Glass is about Time, and the duration is 1 hour 53 minutes. When you go to watch the film, don’t forget to carry your Chronosphere.

Rating: ***

Trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3IWwnNe5mc

CommunicAsia 2016, Preview 4: Smart OTT is the new normal

$
0
0

CommunicAsia 2016, Preview 4: Smart OTT is the new normal

(BroadcastAsia2016 exhibitor, Peter Löfling, Director, Asia Pacific from Edgeware AB, who has been with the company since 2008, shares his predictions and imperatives for the broadcasting industry, in 2016. Löfling is based out of HongKong and has been in the IT industry for 22 years. Broadcast Asia2016 is part of CommunicAsia 2016, being held during 31 May-03 June, at Marina Bay Sands, Singapore)

“Living in an on-demand world, a simple swipe of one’s mobile phone or a few clicks of the mouse can now bring consumers a plethora of content and applications. Direct to Home (DTH), IPTV and Over-the-Top (OTT) services are projected to grow in the next five years on the back of government support in infrastructure development including fibre roll-outs fuelled by increased consumer demand across the Asia Pacific. The region is expected to become the world’s second largest for OTT SVOD services by 2018.

It has no doubt been a great year for OTT in the Asia Pacific, with many new OTT service launches, most notably Netflix launching in Hong Kong, Singapore, South Korea, and Taiwan earlier this year. If 2015 was the year of OTT content, here’s Edgeware’s take on what 2016 will bring:

1. Smart OTT is the new normal

We are already seeing increasing competition in the OTT space, and the number of players will continue to increase this year. “Pureplay” OTT players who aggregate content will face competition from new entrants including traditional pay TV providers, broadcasters and content providers who have started offering their own OTT services (e.g. Viacom’s Noggin, HBO Now, CBS All Access, BBC iPlayer). The need to reach consumers’ multi-screen demand with a direct-to-consumer offering is inevitable. With increasing competition, 2016 will solidify a new normal in which OTT providers compete on being smarter – both in acquiring or producing high concept originals, and in delivering relevant content to the consumer the way they prefer without compromising quality. Smart OTT requires providers to consider the packaging, formats and commercial model that work for the particular customer category. The increasing amount of available content via alternative distribution platforms are challenging the customer channel bundle model as viewers increasingly question the need to pay for content they are not interested in. This will likely result in new product packaging models and increasingly “slim” alternatives, specially designed for OTT distribution. Globally we have seen that Cloud DVR is demonstrating substantial growth, with the industry seeing benefits of cost savings and service flexibility as content rights become increasingly available. This trend is also expected to spread into Asia Pacific, with early adopters like now TV in Hong Kong taking the lead in the adoption.

2. Reconsidering the ad-revenue model: Purposeful advertising 

Personalisation by ad insertion finds its place in the industry. Ad insertion technology has been particularly popular for live streams, replacing old ads with new ones, leading to new revenue opportunities. We can expect stronger industry adoption of the technology, fuelled by the fast-growing phenomenon known as programmatic advertising. Programmatic ad spend is estimated to grow at 20 percent annually, and digital media spend will, “for the first time, account for more than a quarter of total advertising spend in 2016”.

With the vast availability of audience data – from the service providers, media networks, advertisers, and national statistics agencies – TV service and content providers can now combine real-time analytics and ad insertion technologies to provide targeted, personalised experience to viewers at the right time. As we shift TV viewing from big to smaller screens (and with less patience), there will be more scrutiny of the type of ads we see. In the streaming world, the consequences of bad ads – those that are repeated too often or are context unaware – are likely to do more damage to the business than simply channel switching. With so many options, unsatisfied viewers are ready to unsubscribe existing service and never look back. This puts demand on brands and advertisers in re-evaluating how to reach their audience cross-device, and constantly delivering advertising content that is relevant, timely and engaging.

We will also likely see more innovations on ad format, such as shorter, interactive ads and advertising with a purpose. For example, asking viewers to select a different ending, ability to instantly customise a product, targeting ad content based on recently watched items, device types, regions, or even if you have a dog. With some creativity (and commercial awareness), the implementation of ad insertion in combination with analytics technologies sees no boundaries.

3. Actionable analytics

A streaming service enables providers to establish a direct relationship and have conversations with their customers. For example, through requiring viewers to register or sign up for access, the service providers can begin to gather meaningful customer data and gain insights into engagement level, consumption patterns, and so on. Understanding the customer and how the service performs and is consumed is critical to manage the transformation and innovation of new concepts. According to IDC, by 2018, 35 percent of IT resources will be spent to support the creation of new digital revenue stream.

With growing competitive and margin pressures, the need for real-time, actionable data in the TV and content provider space has never been greater. Customer satisfaction and quality of experience become increasingly important measures to sustain growth, reduce churn, and monetize content and services. In 2016, we can expect analytics to play a more significant role in helping OTT providers to act smarter – by making informed business decisions and supporting a constant process of testing, learning and monetising new models and concepts. Here are some examples where specific application of analytics will be most useful:

•     Identify the cause of streaming disturbances faced by a specific customer whether it is device, asset or network problem

•     Understand content engagement by looking into how long viewers watch a certain asset in order to support content creation or acquisition decisions, or provide insights back to content creators

•     Make quarterly market-driven priorities for the business by understanding the cause of customer churn, for example is it functionality, content or price?

Driven by consumers’ expectation for high quality content on demand, OTT remains key, in 2016. To stay ahead, the imperative will be for the industry to look at innovations that enable best viewing experiences from networks, content delivery services to ad-revenue models. At Edgeware, we are excited to share our perspectives and solutions at this BroadcastAsia2016, bringing to participants solutions aimed at delivering profitable, next generation cloud TV and video services.”

(Edgeware AB builds hardware and software systems that deliver TV content, over IP networks. It was founded in 2004, and is headquartered in central Stockholm, with offices in Mexico and Hong Kong, and a wholly-owned U.S. subsidiary, based in Naperville, IL. Edgeware now serves more than 100 customers in over 25 countries in all parts of the world.

Independence Day-Resurgence, Review: Anniversaries and aliens

$
0
0

Independence Day-Resurgence, Review: Anniversaries and aliens

It takes four presidents of the USA to battle a here and now alien invasion—five if you count the first one, in 1996--but the battle is not over yet. German director Roland Emmerich, who gave us the original Independence Day, agreed to helm Independence Day-Resurgence, despite being a self-confessed sequel sceptic. Now, since the end has been left open, he might even return for a trequel or a prequel. However, if they do make the third film, it is not likely to be because this one is great or even a blockbuster (which it is very unlikely to be), but because the proverbial franchise cow is there for the milking.

Twenty years after the events of the previous film, the international community recovers from mass annihilation, and the United Nations creates Earth Space Defense (ESD), a global defence programme that serves as Earth's early warning system. The main defense force uses technology salvaged from the remains of the alien forces, with military forces assembled on the Moon, Mars, and Rhea, while the Area 51 base/safe-house in the US has become the Space Defense Headquarters.

In Africa, ESD Director David Levinson meets with Dr. Catherine Marceaux and warlord Dikembe Umbutu, who lead him to a completely intact alien destroyer that had concealed itself before being shut-down after its mother-ship was destroyed. Umbutu's family had fought against the ship's alien crew, and confiscated many of their weapons, which they now use. Aboard the ship, they discover that the ship was drilling a hole before the aliens' final defeat, and had sent a distress call to its home planet.

About the same time, a small, odd-looking, spherical ship teleports near the ESD's Moon defense headquarters, and is shot down. Suddenly, an alien mother-ship 3,000 miles wide, emerges, and destroys the Moon base, before approaching Earth.

Dean Devlin and Emmerich created the characters and have both worked on this script too, along with Nicolas Wright, James A. Woods and James Vanderbilt. As a plot idea, getting bad aliens to chase good aliens, with earth being caught in the middle, is commendable. Too many liberties are, however, taken, with the first adventure, in terms of continuity and projection. Add to that old emotion/romance tracks and emergent new ones, and the complexity begins to become a burden.

Old man president repeatedly awakening with his nightmares and old man Okun awakening after being in a coma for 20 years, Umbutu leading them to the spaceship as late as twenty years after the crash, and a few more scenes, are unconvincing. One side-plot involves a bus-full of children being chased by the Insect Queen across snow, and drags on too far, consequently losing effect. Another introduces us to gold-diggers and bounty hunters on a small ship, and I strained hard to catch what they were up to, without much luck. There is a tenuous, if any, link, between the alien attack and the American Independence Day, the 4th of July. Do aliens believe in anniversaries?

Technology overdrive is confounded with socio-anthropologo-behaviouriolo-psychological jargon, often used in succession or conjunction. Too many claptrap, populist and glib lines drown the few funny ones. Sample this--

David Levinson: I've had years to get us ready. We never had a chance.

President Whitmore: We didn't last time, either.

Fantasy, sci-fi, ultra-patriotism and disaster are extremely familiar territories for German maker Roland Emmerich--Independence Day, Stargate, Godzilla, The Patriot, The Day After Tomorrow, 2012, and White House Down. In Independence Day-Resurgence, he navigates this space easily, without impressing us too much by his manoeuvres. Effects are high quality and the titanic alien insect Queen does instil fear. Combat scenes, sadly, are predictable, with unrelenting pounding of gunfire, in the awareness that it is a sheer waste of ammo. Encounters between Jake and Dylan are filmed superficially. Umbutu’s ‘attack from the back’ tactic to down the overblown crawlers is hardly ingenuous, even puerile! A clever line comes towards the end, when Patricia instructs her fellow bomber pilots to aim for the creature’s tentacles/legs, which are more vulnerable than the rest of her, she reveals. Indeed, too little too late!

Shot in Mexico and lasting two hours, the film moves slowly in the first half and just about manages to revive interest in the second hour. Rather this than the other way round! It has been given a simultaneous US-India release, and departing from the norm, the press preview in Mumbai was held on a Friday afternoon, instead of the Tuesday/Wednesday/rare Thursday routine. Distributors are wary of press reactions, it would appear.

Liam Hemsworth as Jake Morrison, the lead fighter pilot, is okay; Jeff Goldblum as David Levinson, the lead scientist, computer expert, and environmental activist and Director of ESD, is immersive; Bill Pullman as Thomas J. Whitmore, the 42nd President, stumbles between hamming and falling, but has the audiences’ big support; Maika Monroe, replacing Mae Whitman, as Patricia Whitmore, the former First Daughter and Jake's girlfriend, is effective. Jessie Usher replaces Ross Bagley as Dylan Dubrow-Hiller, the stepson of the now-deceased war hero Steven Hiller (Will Smith's character in the previous film, whose portrait hangs in the background) and Jasmine Dubrow, and a pilot and captain in ESD, has a stock role.

Sela Ward as President Elizabeth Lanford, the 45th President of the United States and the first woman in the country's history to hold the Oval Office, is bound to capture the imagination of viewers, even as Hillary Clinton is campaigning for the office.

Charlotte Gainsbourg as Dr. Catherine Marceaux, a French scientist at ESD, who works alongside David and is David's new love interest, years after his wife died, has small role, parallel to the main plot. Judd Hirsch as Julius Levinson, David's father, provides serio-comic relief, an unlikely hero. Brent Spiner as Dr. Brakish Okun, the unkempt and highly excitable scientist who awakens 20 years after his coma, is modelled after British screen characters of the 60s and 70s films, and you do not know quite what to make of him. Vivica A. Fox as Jasmine Dubrow-Hiller, the widow of the late war hero Steven Hiller, now working as a hospital administrator, will surely jerk a few tears. Robert Loggia as General William Grey, the 43rd President, is seen in his final film role. He died in December 2015. It is a small, strong part.

Will Smith Will be sorely Smithed...er, missed!.

Independence Day-Resurgence will be seen by many, and, probably, missed by as many.

Rating: ** ½

Trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LbduDRH2m2M

Patil-Dayal’s say all: Producer-director Mrunalinni wants her daughter back

$
0
0

Patil-Dayal’s say all: Producer-director Mrunalinni wants her daughter back

After living on the edge for nine years, Mrunalinni has gone to the police, called a press conference and met a lawyer, all in the past week, to complain about mental and physical torture and death threats, by her separated husband, actor-producer Amitabhh Dayal. They have one son, Shivam, and a daughter, Amruta. Amruta is the source of Patil’s grave concern—she has accused Dayal of exposing Amruta to “unmentionable things”.                                                                                                                       

Mrunalinni was born Kavita, to Dr. Suryakanta Patil, a Union Minister and a veteran Maharashtra politician, who was a four-time Member of Parliament, but, after marriage, changed her name  to Mrunalinni, a spelling variation of the popular Indian name Mrinalini or Mrunalini, the latter being a Marathi pronunciation.

Trained to be a doctor, she was attracted to the media a long time ago, first to television, and then cinema. Setting-up as many as four companies-- Suryaa Films Kreation, Shivamrut Creation, Amruta Films Pvt Ltd and Amruta Films (named after Mrunalinni’s mother and children; ownership details of these companies are not available immediately), she made, between 2006 and 2015,  several Hindi and Marathi films, including Aaag, Dhuaaan, Manthan: Ek Amrut Pyala, Raakhandaar, Kaay Raav (also spelt Rao) Tumhi and Karbonn. The 2003 vehicle Kagaar: Life on the Edge, introduced Dayal to the screen. In some instances, her husband’s name appeared as producer.

Though I have known Kavita for about 25 years, I had met them as a couple only once, a decade ago, in Goa, at the International Film Festival of India (IFFI). Dayal took a good, long, look at me, and declared publicly, “You will play the villain in my next film.” Might not sound a welcome remark, but having played the villain in a couple of TV series, I found nothing shocking about the offer. Yes, most of my roles have been of positive characters, but then that’s the challenge. Needles to say, that party where made the announcement was the first and last I heard of Amitabhh Dayal, in person. Sometime later, I learnt from Mrunalinni that the couple had separated, but neither did I ask about developments that led to this pass, nor did Mrunalinni disclose any. In recent, times, besides bumping into her often at film festivals, I have reviewed two of her Marathi films, as producer-director, projects that did not involve Dayal.

Today (01 July), I got some messages and emails from her, about the predicament. No, she did not call me for the press conference she held four days ago, and the privilege of ‘breaking the story’ was offered to a journalist colleague, well-known for his access to the inner circles of filmdom, I think her plight needs to be communicated, so I will not stand on formality.

Here is the video of her press conference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sCtcAHfkf4Y

In it, she has spoken about the allegations and the run-up to them, at length. Hear it from her own mouth.

Now read the press release, edited only for language and typos.

"I had no intention to wash dirty linen in public, but now I am helpless, and have complained against my husband Amitabhh Dayal, who has been, mentally and physically, torturing me, resorting to extortion, blackmailing and even physically abuse. He is also threatening to defame me and kill me. To get back at me, he is luring my mentally troubled daughter to defame me in the media. I have all the proof with me, to prove my point.

"I am married to Amitabhh Dayal, since 2000. On the day of our wedding reception itself, in Bilaspur, he drank, abused, spat on me, and beat me up, in front of his relatives. Finally, his cousin brother, Ajay Najat, came to the hotel, and threatened to take him to the police. Next day, he said “Sorry” in front of the whole family, and I forgave him, and we came back to Mumbai. Things were normal for some days. But again, in the month of June that year, when we went for our honeymoon, he drank again, when we were in Delhi. Here too, he beat me, abused me and even kicked me in my stomach. Once again, he said sorry, but he said it happened because he was drunk.

"After marriage, he started physically torturing me, and asked me to make a film for him. So, to avoid family quarrels, I formed a film company, called Amruta Films Pvt Ltd, and produced a film, called Kagaar, I am still paying the debts of this film. I did this to calm him, thinking now he will stop torturing me. But the physical violence & mental torture continued. He was even admitted in Holy Cross Hospital's psychiatry ward, under Dr. Rajan Prabhu, and was treated for manic depression, with paranoia, and also chronic alcohol addiction.

"The same situation continued for years on end, so much so, that even his own nephew, Gaurav Henry, and other friends too, told me that he was a big womaniser, and a chronic alcoholic. They cautioned me to be aware of him, and keep my daughter away from him. So, 7 years ago, I decided to stay away from him, and severed all ties with him, like his own relatives. But he has lured my teenage daughter and making her meet the media, mainly to defame me. He is also exposing her to a lot of unmentionable things. Finally, she ran away from home on 9th May, 2016, and her father brought her back on 16th May, 2016. But her attitude towards me had changed by now, and she walked out again, with bag and baggage on 29th May, 2016, and he is once again using her against me, to defame my name in the media.

"As I mentioned earlier, my daughter is a mentally troubled child, and she needs at least 2 years of extensive therapy sessions, to cure her, but her father is refraining her from doing so. I am only worried about my daughter's well being. As a last resort, I will be going straight to a magistrate, to seek her judicial custody, and the police officials have also assured me that they will take a due course of action, and will file FIR against my husband, Amitabhh Dayal. We are still not legally divorced, but I was ready to grant him a mutual divorce, on grounds of 7 years of separation. My plea is that my husband should not use my daughter as his shield to get back at me, and tarnish her reputation to pieces, but leave me and my daughter in peace."

She told this writer, “Amu (Amruta) has borderline bi-polar tendency, and a dependent personality, influenced by, and attracted to, negative forces. She is under treatment. He has done so much to harm her mentally.”

Kagaar

The story was conceptualised by Dr Mrunalini Patil, and based on a police “encounter specialist, Daya Nayak, also referred to as the Dirty Harry of Mumbai Police. In some way or the other, Daya was the model for films such as Company (2002), Khakee (2004), Ab Tak Chhappan/So Far 56 (2004, inspired on his life), Aan – Men at Work (2004), Encounter - The Killing (2002) and Ek Haseena Thi/Once There Was a Beauty (2004). Daya is also believed to have provided material for films like ‘D’ (2005), Risk (2007) and Contract (2008).  Besides Hindi, films in south Indian languages too took the cue from the top cop: Daya Nayak—Licence to Kill (Kannada) and Golimaar (Telugu). The Patil family was known to the encounter specialist, and, it was said, that when he heard they wanted a good script to launch their son-in-law, Daya suggested his own life story. Dayal told the press, “Daya Nayak is my alter ego.” Nayak was suspended in 2006, pending an investigation for owning assets disproportionate to his income, cleared of the charge, and reinstated in 2012.

Amitabhh Dayal (sourced from the Internet)

*Besides home productions, also acted in Viruddh.

*Runs a company called Wild Water Entertainment and another named Amitabh Dayal Productions.

*His companies are making feature films ad films, short films, documentaries and more.

*Amitabhh Dayal is the founder of Vac-V.

Spellings

Hindi films and TV, spellings of names may appear peculiar due to Romanising from Hindi/Urdu to English, or due to numerological ‘corrections’. In the case of Amitabh Dayal and Mrunalini Patil, we find this happening many times, with an additional ‘n’ or ‘a’ in names of persons or films. An extra letter, or an apparently inaccurate spelling, is given to the name, to give a weight (total value of the words, using the ascribed value to each letter) that changes the total, from inauspicious to auspicious.

Personally

In a series of interactions with the Mumbai police, especially in the Division that Mrunalinni lives in, I have found them unresponsive, and actually hostile. I am convinced that not one officer, below the rank of Assistant Commissioner, would have even read any of the 1,000 pages of complaints and documentary evidence I have submitted so far. And even the senior officers, who, I am sure, can read and understand English well, would have had no time, or inclination, to do so. But then I am a mere journalist, law graduate and lecturer, a senior citizen, and my written complaints have been in English. Never mind that I have been threatened in the presence of policemen, suffered theft, misappropriation, criminal intimidation, wrongful restraint, extortion and blackmail—they just refuse to record any complaint (known in Indian legal jargon as the First Information Report/Diary Entry). On the other hand, with her connections, and background, Mrunalinni should be able to get the police to act tout de suite. I hope she gets a fair investigation.

(An update will follow).

Disclaimer

Information published above is merely in the nature of news. No attempt is being made to decide the merits of or pass a verdict on the matter. We are open to add/correct/update the information, should facts emerge, after considering their prima facie nature.

The Legend of Tarzan, Review: Gorillas in the Midst

$
0
0

The Legend of Tarzan, Review: Gorillas in the Midst

Remember the immortal lines, “Me Tarzan, you Jane”?  Now try this, "He's Tarzan, you're Jane. He'll come for you," says her captor to Jane. He sure will. He’s been coming on to the screen for the last 98 years, in 41 movie and 57 TV outings. Adds up to 98 again. The Legend of Tarzan, preceding the character’s on-screen centenary by a whisker, is a slightly over-written exercise, without too many special effects and CGI, the mandatory motion capture notwithstanding. It works fine if you go in with an open mind. Start comparing it to the technical overload of superhero movies or the novelty of early Tarzan films, and it can be disappointing.

It has been years since the man once known as Tarzan (Skarsgård) left the jungles of Africa behind for a ‘gentrified’ life, as John Clayton III, Lord Greystoke, with his beloved wife, Jane (Robbie) at his side. Now, he has been invited back to the Congo to serve as a trade emissary of the British Parliament, unaware that he is a pawn in a deadly convergence of greed and revenge, masterminded by the Belgian, Captain Leon Rom (Waltz).

Flash-back.

In a tree-house, John Clayton II’s Alice dies of natural causes, and Clayton is killed by apes. An ape named Kala (Madeleine Worrall) and her son Akut (Matt Cross) find Clayton's one year-old son, John Clayton III. Kala adopts him as Tarzan, who would later become a famed ape man. At a point, Tarzan finds Jane daughter of American explorer Prof. Archimedes Q. Porter (John Hurt), who sort of re-discovers him, and the two marry.

Later in 1889, a conference is held, to divide up the African Congo. King Leopold II of Belgium seizes control of the land's minerals, which result in large profits. When the resources began to run dry, Leopold sends Captain Léon Rom (Christoph Waltz) to secure more minerals. While Rom searches for the minerals, his men open fire on a militant tribe. Rom is approached by the leader, Chief Mbonga (Djimon Hounsou), who offers Rom the minerals for Tarzan, who killed his son, after Kala died at the young man’s hands.

The British Prime Minister (Jim Broadbent) speaks to John, now Lord Greystoke, who is invited by King Leopold to head a trading expedition to Boma. George Washington Williams (Samuel L. Jackson) urges John to go, as he is really Tarzan, the famed ape man that lived in the jungle and was raised by apes.

John, Jane, and George take their trip to the Congo. Rom and his men attack the tribe's camp, and tie up John and Jane. Rom also shoots the tribe's leader, in front of everyone. He captures Jane and several tribe members, while John manages to roll away down a hill. George and the remaining tribe members chase the villains, but they escape. George finds John, and unties him. John sets out to find Jane, and the tribe members, with seven of his own, and a reluctant George.

Detailed screenplay and a clear narrative are not so common these days. The writers, Adam Cozad and Craig Brewer (a writer-director), who was to direct this film, deserve plaudits for their painstaking research, and the way they have fused elements like diamonds and minerals with the historical rubber trade background of Congo. The character of Williams, probably inspired by Henry Stanley (see below), has been inspiringly delineated, bringing in two more dimensions, of the tyranny of 19th century America, the plunder of Mexico and the annihilation of Red Indians in North America, merely through dialogue. The film is also the most incisive indictment of Belgian King Léopold II and the mass killings and the systematic plunder of Congo. Conflict points and confrontations come in clever trough and surge alternations, pacing the action sensibly, rather than going all guns blazing. Within the jungle and the water, both, players and ambience, keep refreshing themselves. So, it not all Tarzan nor all Jane. There are lions, hippos, elephants, crocodiles and gorillas in the midst.

David Yates is best known for directing the final four films in the Harry Potter film series: entries five, six, seven, and eight (2007–2011). Earlier, there was The Tichborne Claimant.

No magic here, but pretty close to that. Yates keep his characters and action credible, and once you accept three things—Tarzan was raised by giant apes, can communicate with animals and swing across dense forests from vines—you can go along. There’s a bit of humour too, some very crude, some subtle, some slapstick. I see only two problems with the narrative and the sequences, both related to unfulfilled expectations. Firstly, the film ends-up highly making potentially explosive political statements. Secondly, with a potential ‘Superhero’, probably the oldest in cinema, as the subject, audiences may not have the patience to go through a story too. What? Tarzan has no superpowers? All those grey tones are indicators of ‘destruction of the universe’ battles coming on, aren’t they? No? Oh, they are there because the jungle naturally is dark? How sad! Two problems, but in the era of DC Marvel and Disney, they could be huge problems. Imagine, in a one to one fight with an ape, Tarzan loses.

Alexander Skarsgård, son of Swedish actor Stellan Skarsgård (Indians might remember Stellan; see picture), played Meekus in the Zoolander, and appeared in Lars von Triers’ Melancholia too. This could have been his big break. It might fall short of that, yet he makes a mark. Australian Margot Robbie, who made an impact with Wolf of Wall Street, is guts and gumption, and convincingly and madly, in love with her husband. Djimon Hounsou, the Beninese actor (Amistad, Gladiator, Blood Diamond) hams a bit,  John Hurt, recovering from cancer and 75 years old, is not called upon to match his Elephant Man, Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy, Harry Potter, Midnight Express, Alien and A Man for All Seasons histrionics, yet manages to say a lot with his silences. Christoph Waltz uses stock-in-trade mannerisms as naturally as ever, included the Mr. Know-All half-grin, the blink and tilt of head, et al. Wonder how long will he cling to them. Blame directors too, for not trying something new with him. Samuel L. Jackson, by contrast, is not playing a venom-spouting perverted part, though you cannot keep him away from the action. Adds star value and experience.

The behind-the-scenes creative team includes director of photography Henry Braham (The Golden Compass), and music composer Rupert Gregson-Williams (Urban Ghost Story, Prince of Egypt, Swing Vote), worked as a teacher in Africa. Both make significant contributions.

Warner held the local preview on Friday morning, and missed some of the beginning. By the time this is uploaded, Saturday evening, the film has been largely panned. I might be sticking my neck out by being counted among the few that have not panned the movie. By no stretch of imagination is it a milestone. That having been said, I can’t say it is bad either.

Rating: ***

Trailer: https://youtu.be/jBwynG1beCE

Stellan Skarsgård and Naseeruddin Shah in The Prefect Murder, 1988, directed by Zafar Hai

The Legend of Tarzan, as chronicled by Edgar Rice Burroughs

Tarzan is the son of a British Lord and Lady who were marooned on the West coast of Africa by mutineers. When Tarzan was a year old, his mother died of natural causes, and his father was killed by Kerchak, leader of the ape tribe into which Tarzan was adopted. Tarzan’s tribe of apes is known as the Mangani, Great Apes, of a species unknown to science. Kala is his ape mother. Tarzan (White-skin) is his ape name; his English name is John Clayton, Lord Greystoke (the formal title is Viscount Greystoke, according to Burroughs in Tarzan, Lord of the Jungle; Earl of Greystoke in later, non-canonical sources, notably the 1984 movie Greystoke). In fact, Burroughs, as narrator of Tarzan of the Apes, describes both Clayton and Greystoke as fictitious names – implying that, within the fictional world that Tarzan inhabits, he may have a different real name.

As a young adult, Tarzan meets a young American woman, Jane Porter, who, along with her father and others of their party, is marooned, at exactly the same spot on the African coast where Tarzan’s parents were, twenty years earlier. When she returns to America, he leaves the jungle in search of her, his one true love. In later books, Tarzan and Jane marry, and he lives with her for a time, in England. They have one son, Jack, who takes the ape name Korak (“the Killer”). Tarzan is contemptuous of the hypocrisy of civilisation, and he and Jane return to Africa, making their home on an extensive estate that becomes a base for Tarzan’s later adventures.

Edgar Rice Burroughs: Author Portrait

From the day he was born, in Chicago, on September 1, 1875, until he submitted one-half a novel to All-Story Magazine in 1911, Edgar Rice Burroughs™ failed in nearly every enterprise he tried.

He enlisted as a private in the Seventh U.S. Cavalry, for he had the notion that he might still obtain a commission as an officer, if he distinguished himself in a difficult assignment. Thus, he asked to be sent to the worst post in America–a request the authorities speedily granted. The post was Fort Grant in the Arizona desert, and his mission, as he put it, was to “chase the Apaches”. “I chased a good many Apaches”, he tells us, “But fortunately for me, I never caught up with any of them.”

He became a cowboy in Idaho, then a shopkeeper, a railroad policeman, a gold miner, and even an “expert accountant”, although he knew nothing of the profession. Throughout this period, he somehow raised money for a number of his own businesses, all of which sank without a trace.

Finally he reached rock bottom. He was 35 years old, without a job, without money. There was a wife and two children to support, and a third child was expected soon. He could buy food and coal only by pawning his watch, and Emma (his wife)’s jewellery.

“Then, somehow, I got hold of a few dollars, and took an agency for the sale of a lead-pencil sharpener. I would not try to sell the sharpeners myself, but I advertised for agents and sent them out. They did not sell any pencil sharpeners, but in the leisure moments, while I was waiting for them to come back to tell me that they had not sold any, I started writing Under the Moons of Mars, my first story.”

“I got $400 for first magazine serial rights. The check was the first big event in my life. No amount of money today could possibly give me the thrill that this first $400 check gave me.”

His next novel was Tarzan of the Apes, an astonishing success on its appearance in All-Story Magazine in 1912, Tarzan of the Apes brought Edgar Rice Burroughs™ a mere $700, but after being rejected by practically every major book publisher in the country, it finally was printed in book form, by A.C. McClurg and Co., and became a 1914 best-seller.

By the time his pen was stilled, nearly 100 stories bore Edgar Rice Burroughs™’ name.

In 1918, Tarzan came to the screen, with Tarzan of the Apes, starring Elmo Lincoln, the first film in history to gross over one million dollars. Since then, 41 Tarzan films and 57 one-hour television episodes have been produced, each a great financial success. In 1942 he became America’s oldest war correspondent, covering stories with the Pacific Fleet for United Press. He returned home from the South Pacific only after suffering a series of heart attacks. Ironically, he was unable to find a suitable home in Tarzana, and he spent his remaining years in a modest house in nearby Encino. It was there, on March 19th, 1950, that Edgar Rice Burroughs™ set down his pen for the last time.

One scholar suggests that the very last line of the very last novel may be taken as Burroughs’ own unintentional valedictory to a very meaningful life: “Thank God for everything.”

--Edgar Rice Burroughs, ERB™ website

Who was King Léopold II?

Léopold II, French in full Léopold-Louis-Philippe-Marie-Victor, Dutch in full Leopold Lodewijk Filips Maria Victor (born 1835, Brussels, Belgium--died 1909) king of the Belgians, from 1865 to 1909. Keen on establishing Belgium as an imperial power, he led the first European efforts to develop the Congo River basin, making possible the formation, in 1885, of the Congo Free State, annexed in 1908 as the Belgian Congo, and now known as the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Léopold II was a first cousin of Queen Victoria of Britain. In 1853, he married Marie-Henriette, daughter of the Austrian archduke Joseph, palatine of Hungary, and became king of the Belgians, on his father’s death, in December 1865. Presenting himself as a philanthropist, eager to bring the benefits of Christianity, Western civilisation, and commerce to African natives—a guise that he perpetuated for many years—Léopold hosted an international conference of explorers and geographers, at the royal palace in Brussels, in 1876. Several years later, he hired the explorer Henry Morton Stanley, to be his man in Africa. For five years, Stanley travelled up and down the immense waterways of the Congo River basin, setting up trading posts, building roads, and persuading local chiefs—almost all of them illiterate—to sign treaties with Léopold. The treaties, some of which appear to have been subsequently doctored to Léopold’s liking, were then put to use by the Belgian monarch.

He persuaded first the United States and then all the major nations of Western Europe to recognise a huge swath of Central Africa—roughly the same territory as the modern-day Democratic Republic of the Congo—as his personal property. He called it État Indépendant du Congo, the Congo Free State. It was the world’s only private colony, and Léopold referred to himself as its “proprietor.”

The king then embarked on an ultimately successful effort to make a vast fortune from his new possession. Initially he was most interested in ivory, a material that was greatly valued in the days before plastics, because it could be carved into a great variety of shapes—statuettes, jewellery, piano keys, false teeth, and more. For some years, ivory was a principal source of the great wealth that Léopold and his associates drew from the new colony.

Between 1880 and 1920, the population of the Congo may have been slashed by up to 50 percent, from perhaps 20 million people at the beginning of that period, to an estimated 10 million at the end. His forced-labour system for gathering rubber was swiftly copied by French, German, and Portuguese colonial officials, with equally fatal results. Because the system’s effects in the Congo could so easily be blamed on one man, who could safely be attacked, because he did not represent a great power, an international outcry focused on Leopold. That pressure finally forced him to relinquish his ownership of the territory, and it became the Belgian Congo in 1908. Léopold, however, made the Belgian government pay him for his prized possession. He died the following year. Because his only son had predeceased him, Léopold’s nephew, Albert I, succeeded to the throne.

He is remembered in Belgium for some of what he built with his Congo wealth, such as the monumental Arcade du Cinquantenaire in Brussels, and for his advocacy of strong fortifications in the eastern part of the country, which slowed the advance of German troops in 1914 at the beginning of World War I. His most important legacy, however, remains the human catastrophe that the rubber forced-labour system brought to the Congo—a heritage that continued to echo in that region more than a century after Léopold’s death.

--Adam Hochschild, excerpted from Encyclopædia Britannica

George Washington Williams, by John Hope Franklin

In "George Washington Williams", John Hope Franklin reconstructs the life of the controversial, self-made black intellectual who wrote the first history of African Americans in the United States. Awarded the Clarence L. Holte Literary Prize, this book traces Franklin's forty-year quest for Williams's story, a story largely lost to history until this volume was first published in 1985. The result, part biography and part social history, is a unique consideration of a pioneering historian by his most distinguished successor. Williams, who lived from 1849 to 1891, had a remarkable career as soldier, minister, journalist, lawyer, politician, free-lance diplomat, and African traveller, as well as a historian. While Franklin reveals the accomplishments of this neglected figure and emphasises the racism that curtailed Williams's many talents, he also highlights the personal weaknesses that damaged Williams's relationships and career.

Williams led the way in presenting African American history accurately through the use of oral history and archival research, sought to legitimise it as a field of historical study, and spoke out in support of an American Negro Historical Society and as a critic of European imperialism in Africa. He also became erratic and faithless to his family and creditors, and died at the age of forty-one, destitute, and alienated from family and friends. "George Washington Williams" is nothing less than a classic biography of a brilliant, though flawed individual, whose "History of the Negro Race in America" remains a landmark in African American history and American intellectual history.

Tarzan Goes to India, 1962

Jock Mahoney as Tarzan

Feroz Khan as Prince Raghu Kumar

Simi (Garewal) as Princess Kamara

Abbas Khan (Sanjay Khan) as the Pilot

Tarzan is called to India to save three hundred elephants that will be drowned if a dam is opened to create a man-made lake to power an electric plant. Tarzan is pitted against two engineers, who ignore the catastrophic results their work will create.


Reviews, G5A-NYIFF screenings: Velutha Rathrikal (White Nights)

$
0
0

Reviews, G5A-NYIFF screenings: Velutha Rathrikal (White Nights)

Inclement weather (read incessant rains) and no means of transport deprived me of the opportunity to catch-up on For the Love of a Man, screened on 28th June, as part of the G5A-NYIFF film festival, currently underway at the Foundation’s Black Box, located in a creatively designed facility in an erstwhile industrial estate, close to the iconic Famous Mahalaxmi studio and office complex. Earlier in the year, I had seen only the last few minutes of the well-made documentary on South Indian superstar Rajanikanth’s fans and fan clubs, when it was shown at the Mumbai International Film Festival (MIFF).

Two days later, I made sure that I do not end up drenched and stranded around the screening time (7.30 pm), and was already at the venue when the clock showed 7.15, enough time to savour half a cup of hot tea before the show began. Lined up for the day was a long take on Fyodor Dostoyevsky’s short story, White Nights, all of 2 hours and 10 minutes, by Kerala-based director Razi Muhammed. At least two hours of the film were a treat for the eyes and ears, and it just fell short of attaining greatness by not much. A thousand images lingered in your mindscape as you emerged from the Black Box and walked into the black monsoon night.

Velutha Rathrikal

Velutha Rathrikal (White Nights) is an adaptation of the eponymous novel by Fyodor Dostoyevsky, with many, many liberties.

Manu is an artist, a painter and sketcher, in search of a new world, from his troubled past, and lives in a forest settlement. He meets Chelly, a tribal girl from a nearby settlement, who bears the scars from her own share of life’s wounds. As she awaits the return of her beloved friend and lover, Jyothi, Manu gets closer to her. Despite their diverse upbringings, Manu and Chelly strike a serene and beautiful chord with each other. Their brief but intense encounter, reviving every at a canal bridge over five successive nights, juxtaposes harsh realities against captivating nature.

Writer director Razi Muhammed went on to study at FTII in Pune, after his degree from College of Fine Arts, Thiruvananthapuram, and Masters, from the MS University, Baroda. He has been the production designer of numerous acclaimed Malayalam and Hindi films. Amidst his projects in films, Razi has exhibited his paintings and photographs at various solo and group shows, in India and Europe. Many of his works are with private collectors in India, Canada, UK, Belgium, and New Zealand. He also lectures as a guest faculty at various fine arts colleges, across Kerala. This film his is directorial debut.

 

Always obsessed with Dostoyevsky, he has reworked a pet subject in a manner that allows him to blend a host of elements together: glorious nature, seductive and sparingly used special effects, painting, sketching, folk music, discrimination against tribals, communal riots (set in Baroda, where he had studied, one of the weaker points of the narrative), the earthquake in Nepal, demonising of drug addicts and homosexuals/lesbians, platonic love v/s physical love, fleeting moments v/s permanence, marital violence, loss of loved ones, sexism in Indian society, solitude, betrayal, modernism v/s decadence (jeeps, laptops, mobile phones, a brilliantly captured art exhibition in the forest), community agriculture v/s destruction of flora and fauna.

Shehnad Jalal, an alumnus of Satyajit Ray Film & Television Institute of India, Kolkata, is an award-winning cinematographer. His work in films such as Kanyaka Talkies (2013) and Chitrasutram (2010) has earned him plaudits. Cinematography is key to this project, and often the extension of the art and design by the auteur-director. By many yard-sticks, this is award-winning stuff too. On a couple of occasions, there are rapid cuts from dark nights to white sunlight, which are startling and even jarring, but obviously intentional. What were the director and editor (Ajith Kumar B.) trying to effect? Distancing of the audience? Dichotomy of night and day? Hope and despair? We can read many meanings.

Disney James underplays Manu to perfection. A lecturer-turned-actor, he has been acting in films since 2010. Some notable appearances: @Andheri, Puthumukhangal Thevai, Memories, North 24 Kaatham, Jilebi, Ennum Eppozhum, Kunjiraamayanam, Ennu Ninte Moideen, Mutdhugavu and Adi Kapyare and Koottmani.

 

Smitha Ambu has the more complex role, effervescent at one moment, morose the next. But her joie de vivre, and survival against all odds, is admirably delineated. A stage and film actress, she completed her studies in Theatre from Ninasam, Karnataka, and works as a Theatre in Education instructor. Chitrasutram has been one of her acclaimed films. Her face is more square than round, complexion really dark and her body is on the heavy side. All these facets go well with the character. It does come as a surprise that she is the womanly partner in the couple, but her mate is more suave, better read and widely travelled. If one of them were to be able to let her feeling get the better of her, it would have to be Jyothi.

Playing the college-mate, and later lover, of Chelly, Jyothi, is Saritha Kukku. Kerala State Film Award winner for Papillio Budha, she also acted in Ranipadhmini, Iyobinde Pusthagum and Ka Body Escape. Cast as a sympathiser who initiates Chelly into forbidden love, she faces a challenging task—to convince and yet not look cheap or titillating. Helped by some crisp and timely editing, the affair is maintained just within acceptable norms, considering the film is anything but a sex romp.

Singer-actress Resmi Sateesh studied audiography at Satyajit Ray Film and Television Institute. Music training had begun when she was just five. Her travels exposed to the wide-ranging genres of music in India, and that opened doors to the various forms of music from all around the world too. She had the opportunity to visit many tribal hamlets in the forests, along with a group of friends, who recorded their songs, as part of their post-graduation studies. Besides Malayalam, she has sung in Hindi too (Khoobsoorat).  It is a delight to hear her lead the music included in the film, usually as an integrated live performance.

Rating: ****

Trailer: https://youtu.be/TVYfbaw0L7k

On Tuesday, 5th July, the G5A-NYIFF schedule lists three short films: July 05, 2016: Agli Baar; Absent; El'ayichi; Daaravtha.

Fyodor Dostoyevsky (also spelt Dostoevsky)

Born in 1821 in Moscow, he lived much of his childhood distanced from his parents. In these formative years, he formed a close bond with his elder brother, Mikhail. They would spend many hours reading celebrated Russian author, Pushkin, by candlelight, in their family's comfortable suburban home. Poor Folk/Poor People his first novel, published in 1846, to warm critical response. Something of a literary figure at the age of twenty-five, Dostoevsky began attending the revolutionary discussion group that would result in his imprisonment, and the eventual mock execution.

His sentence was commuted to four years in prison, and four years of army service. His prison experiences, as well as his life after prison, among the urban poor of Russia, would provide a vivid backdrop for much of his later work. Released from his imprisonment and service by 1858, he began a fourteen-year period of furious writing, in which he published many significant texts. Among these are: The House of the Dead (1862), Notes from the Underground (1864), Crime and Punishment (1866), The Idiot (1868), and Devils (1871).

During this period, Dostoevsky's life was in upheaval, as he lost both his first wife and his brother. On February 15, 1867, he married his stenographer, Anna Grigorevna Snitkina, who would manage his affairs until his death, in 1881. Two months before he died, Dostoevsky completed the epilogue to The Brothers Karamazov (1880), which was published in serial form in the Russian Messenger. His funeral attracted thousands of citizens, as Russia mourned the death of a significant literary hero.

(Excerpted from the biography written by Pauls Toutonghi, a former student of Tom Beyer's Russian Literature class at Middlebury College)

Excerpt from the original White Nights, Russian title Belye Nochi

"Listen, listen!" I interrupted her. "Forgive me if I tell you something else.... I tell you what, I can't help coming here to-morrow, I am a dreamer; I have so little real life that I look upon such moments as this now, as so rare, that I cannot help going over such moments again in my dreams. I shall be dreaming of you all night, a whole week, a whole year. I shall certainly come here to-morrow, just here to this place, just at the same hour, and I shall be happy remembering to-day. This place is dear to me already. I have already two or three such places in Petersburg. I once shed tears over memories ... like you.... Who knows, perhaps you were weeping ten minutes ago over some memory.... But, forgive me, I have forgotten myself again; perhaps you have once been particularly happy here...."

"Very good," said the girl, "perhaps I will come here to-morrow, too, at ten o'clock. I see that I can't forbid you.... The fact is, I have to be here; don't imagine that I am making an appointment with you; I tell you beforehand that I have to be here on my own account. But ... well, I tell you straight out, I don't mind if you do come. To begin with, something unpleasant might happen as it did to-day, but never mind that.... In short, I should simply like to see you ... to say two words to you. Only, mind, you must not think the worse of me now! Don't think I make appointments so lightly.... I shouldn't make it except that.... But let that be my secret! Only a compact beforehand...."

"A compact! Speak, tell me, tell me all beforehand; I agree to anything, I am ready for anything," I cried delighted. "I answer for myself, I will be obedient, respectful ... you know me...."

"It's just because I do know you that I ask you to come to-morrow," said the girl, laughing. "I know you perfectly. But mind you will come on the condition, in the first place (only be good, do what I ask—you see, I speak frankly), you won't fall in love with me.... That's impossible, I assure you. I am ready for friendship; here's my hand.... But you mustn't fall in love with me, I beg you!"

Earlier screen versions

Le Notti Bianche (The White Nights), 1957

Italian, B&W, Starring Maria Schell and Marcello Mastroianni.

Directed and co-written by Luchino Visconti (1906-76), an aristocrat by birth-- Count don Luchino Visconti di Modrone--also directed Obsession, Rocco and His Brothers, The Leopard, The Damned and Death in Venice. A well-known Marxist, he was openly and gay.

Saawariya (The Dark Guy/Lover), 2007

Indian, Hindi, Colour, starring Ranbir Kapoor, Sonam Kapoor (first film for both), Salman Khan and Rani Mukerji

Produced and directed by Sanjay Leela Bhansali.

CommunicAsia 2016: Accelerate Digitisation--Building a Better Connected World

$
0
0

CommunicAsia 2016: Accelerate Digitisation--Building a Better Connected World

 By Alan Marcus, Head, ICT Agenda

In this article, Alan Marcus, Head of ICT Agenda, Member of Management Committee, World Economic Forum, and Speaker, Asia ICT Innovation Forum 2016, at CommunicAsia, shares his thoughts on some of these changing dynamics, as well as rule-making opportunities in the digital world.

Rapid advancements in digital technology are redefining society. The plummeting cost of advanced technologies (a top-of-the-range smart-phone in 2007 cost $499; a model with similar specifications cost $10 in 2015) is revolutionising business and society. While this has the potential to dramatically change their role, it also provides access to new instruments and rulemaking opportunities for regulators.

In addition, the ‘combinatorial effects’ of these technologies – mobile, cloud, artificial intelligence, sensors and analytics, etc. – are accelerating progress exponentially. This revolution could significantly improve the quality of life of billions around the world, and technology is the multiplier. However, with the advent of digital technologies, a number of accelerated and new market dynamics are dramatically transforming the environment in which regulatory bodies govern.  While this has the potential to dramatically change their role, it also provides access to new instruments and rulemaking opportunities for regulators. Here are some of these changing dynamics, as well as rulemaking opportunities:

1.    Speed

The speed of innovation of digital technologies stands in stark contrast to the pace of regulation. Jack Ma, CEO of Alibaba rightly pointed out that “seven- to twelve-year regulatory policy timelines do not reflect the speed of the internet.” New technologies that used to have two-year cycle times now can become obsolete in six months, and the pace of change is not slowing. These technologies can be developed, deployed, and iterated faster than ever. The challenges of the digital world require the ability to answer faster than classical instruments of regulation allow.

One key area affected by the speed of innovation is the protection of consumer interests. As innovation takes place at a far greater speed than regulation can keep up with, regulatory frameworks originally put in place to protect consumers are no longer always appropriate. For example, the logistics industry alone contributes 13% to global emissions, but stakeholders need to act quickly to develop safe and trustworthy approaches to unlocking benefits from digital technologies such as drones. With the promise of reducing emissions by up to 90% and costs by 25% in last-mile deliveries, drone technology is ‘ready’, but regulation is not.

2.    Emergence of Business (Eco) Systems

Business (eco) systems have been described as “dynamic and co-evolving communities of diverse actors who create and capture new value through both collaboration and competition.”  These networks of organisations operating across industries are enabled primarily by digital technologies, and constitute a stark departure from the silo-ed and self-contained organisations of the past. The emergence of these business systems gives rise to new requirements for regulation and policy; they can no longer narrowly target individual industries, but need to take into account developments of common trends and patterns across sectors.

Digital technologies have also reduced barriers to entry for traditional and non-traditional organisations, often undermining long-standing sources of product differentiation. For example, online service providers tap markets without having to build distribution networks of offices and local agents.

This changing landscape presents real challenges for regulators. Not only is the number of services and products they regulate growing, but so is the number of suppliers and consumers, increasing the complexity of the environment they govern in.

3.    Globalised Networks

We live in an increasingly interconnected world. Just as it is no longer sufficient to look at policy and regulation within silo-ed sectors, one can no longer create policy frameworks without taking global and trans-regional developments into account. While policy will continue to be mostly created at the national level (for the near-term future, at least), globalised networks require regulators to take into account a broader and more complex scope of geographical dimensions.

One example of this phenomenon is the convergence of global supply and demand.  Digital technologies know no borders, and the customer’s demand for a unified experience is raising pressure on global companies to standardise offerings. Consumers and businesses have come to expect payment systems that work across borders, global distribution, indiscriminate access and rights, and a uniform customer experience. Harmonised regulation across regions can greatly accelerate innovation and leverage existing technologies to realise these goals, while heterogeneous approaches risk stinting development. 

Several ongoing regulatory changes are impacting world trade – for example, Safe Harbor, Google versus the EU Commission, and the Federal Aviation Administration and unmanned aerial vehicles (drones) – and are creating challenges to national boundaries, unfair competition and consumer protection.

4.    New Business Models

It is widely recognised that digital technology is an enabler of fundamental innovation and disruption, for business and society. One of these sources of disruption is a multitude of new business models (e.g. on-demand model, access-over-ownership model). Whether it’s adaptations of existing market models or completely new models, the current regulation is still not in a position to respond to these disruptions in a timely manner.

While many of these models are sources of new value creation, income opportunities, or employment, there are also inherent risks to society. For example, who is responsible for the public health and safety of a passenger who chose a ride-share in the case of an accident?  The sharing economy is just one recent example of technologies disrupting traditional business models, and there may be more disruptions ahead as entrepreneurs find new ways of meeting consumers’ needs.

Lightware opens China Operations Center

$
0
0

Lightware opens China Operations Center

Lightware Visual Engineering Limited, the Budapest, Hungary  based manufacturer of professional digital video and audio signal management solutions for DVI, HDMI, DisplayPort, 3G-SDI, HDBaseT, fiber, caters to the needs of the Corporate, Hospitality, Medical, Military, Education, and Live Events markets. The inventor of digital matrix switching, Lightware entered China to provide world-class video switching for the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games opening ceremony, then continued to deliver solutions for the Shanghai World Fair, Han Show in Wuhan, and, most recently, provided a comprehensive fiber switching platform for Shanghai Disney© Resort.

In order to strength the sales and service platform in mainland China, Lightware recently acquired their agent in Guangzhou, Cheering Electronics, and the entire team is now officially part of the Lightware China Operations Center.  Lightware also took the opportunity to present the new team to the market at InfoComm China, in Beijing.  Lightware will soon also be opening offices in Beijing and Shanghai, directly facing the market and expanding to meet the needs of their customers.

Gergely Vida, President & CEO, mentioned that "China is poised for steady growth in the long-term, and putting Lightware China in place is our commitment to the market and shows our esteemed customers our continued support and trust. The new office will play an integral part in Lightware's growth internationally, and will serve to further solidify our stance in the market." 

CommunicAsia 2016: Huawei’s Cloud Communication journey, and debut

$
0
0

CommunicAsia 2016: Huawei’s Cloud Communication journey, and debut

Founded in 1987, Huawei is a Chinese multi-national, headquartered in Shenzhen. At CommunicAsia 2016, in Singapore, Huawei made its debut in the field of Cloud Communication, an E2E communication solution for Personal, Home, Enterprise, and Vertical use. Cloud Communication helps operators implement network evolution, service innovation, and business model transformation by means of all cloud, full openness, and redefined service experience.

The conference attracted over 150 analysts, reporters, and representatives from leading operators in the South Pacific (including this writer). On the subject of "Reframing a colourful communication life," Huawei and participants discussed technical and business challenges, as well as development trends in the ICT industry.

Wang Songtao, Vice President of Cloud Core Network Product Line, delivered the keynote address. He remarked, "We commit to enriching life through communication.”

Facing great challenges, how do operators seize opportunities in digital communication to ensure successful ICT transformation?

The explosion of smart terminals and mobile Internet creates unprecedented challenges for operators. With the rapid development of social applications, end users are no longer satisfied with traditional voice and SMS. Now, end users want a ubiquitous, multimedia experience.

As the communication field expands, Personal and Enterprise users require convergent communications. Meanwhile, we also see the communication capabilities are applied to TVs, mobile accesses, smart watches, and intelligent robots.

As an important conveyor of information, video has been widely used in all industries, from entertainment to communications as well as remote education and telemedicine. Today, real-time video has become an indispensable part of daily life. It can be said without exaggeration that seizing the opportunity to develop real-time video is seizing a winning ticket in the future of video.

Based on a unified cloud platform, Huawei Cloud Communication redefines user experience. The Voice and Video over LTE (V2oLTE) solution provides dual HD services to individuals, improving personal communication experience. The Enterprise Communication solution provides a full-service portfolio to meet the requirements of small, medium, and big sized enterprise and helps operators expand to enterprise markets. The Cloud Video solution not only satisfies families' demands for large-screen video communication, but also extends to various video applications in verticals, helping operators take control of the future of the video industry. Through network capability exposure and cooperation with partners from various industries, the communication as a service (CaaS) solution promotes crowd-sourcing service innovation as well as business model transformation, helping operators implement ubiquitous communication and build a win-win industry ecosystem.

The V2oLTE solution implements evolution to a genuine All-IP network. With HD voice, HD video, and rich media communication, it strengthens relationships with users and consolidates voice revenues. Huawei has extensive experience with VoLTE deployment. Based on quick service inheritance, minimum changes to live networks, and flexible terminal adaptation capabilities, Huawei shortens the time to market (TTM) for VoLTE services to under six months.

Their Enterprise Communication solution integrates all communication methods and scenarios and provides a unified architecture and management system to offer the same communication experience for different enterprise users. It supports the deployment for private cloud, public cloud, and hybrid cloud. It helps enterprises build their own communication and collaboration platforms as needed, heightening competitive edge and efficiency. In addition, Huawei provides a variety of terminals to meet requirements for different scenarios such as meeting rooms, office desktops, SOHO, and business trips.

Cloud Video solution aggregates various video capabilities of operators, such as video call, recording, encryption, and analysis. It provides large-screen video communication for families as well as services in verticals (for example, telemedicine, remote education, and video customer services). This solution helps operators make video services as a new basic service, increasing revenue.

The CaaS solution helps operators open communication capabilities and resources through APIs and SDKs. By bringing message, voice, video, conference, and collaborative communication capabilities as well as user data to different applications, operators can implement ubiquitous connections and communication between humans, things, and organizations. Embedding communication capabilities into the business process improves enterprise efficiency and service innovation.

Huawei has over 1,000 partners, across more than 17 industries. 

Reviews, G5A-NYIFF screenings: Agli Baar, Absent, El’ Ayichi

$
0
0

Reviews, G5A-NYIFF screenings: Agli Baar, Absent, El’ Ayichi

Devashish Makhija is a Kolkata boy who was so shattered by his mother’s death that he got on to a Mumbai-bound train, in an unreserved compartment, and has been living here since. After a stint in advertising and after assisting debutant director Anurag Kashyap on Black Friday, he decided to go solo. Black Friday was about the Mumbai blasts and was stuck with the censors for years.

But for an unreleased Oonga, all his efforts to make a feature film have been unfruitful for about a decade. In the meanwhile, he got opportunities to make shorts, about a year ago, and made four of them—very very, short short films. Appropriately, he has named his production company Terribly Tiny Talkies. Taandav, which has Manoj Bajpai playing a head constable and was released on an online movie streaming website in February, is not part of this three-film pack, which was screened at G5A’s Black Box, on Tuesday, 05 July.

Agli Baar translates as Next Time.

Remember Martin Niemoeller?

Niemoeller was a German Protestant pastor, born 1892, died 1984. He was anti-communist, and initially, supported the Nazis, until they made the church subordinate to state authority.

He is best known for his powerful statement about the failure of Germans to speak out against the Nazis:

“First they came for the Communists, but I was not a Communist so I did not speak out. Then they came for the Socialists and the Trade Unionists, but I was neither, so I did not speak out. Then they came for the Jews, but I was not a Jew so I did not speak out. And when they came for me, there was no one left to speak out for me.”

Makhija takes the essence of this ‘poem’, creates a milieu within the slum demolition scenario in Mumbai, with a female battling advocate and a contract killer on their respective missions. He adds a religious angle to it, and sledge-hammers the message of standing up for the poor and defenceless, in just three basic scenes. His cinematic phrases consist of tight frames, smaller frames within frames, just about three locations in the same vicinity, silences to enhance the impact of ghastly events, mobile phone cameras as ominous, two-way tools, mirroring grim reality and sending out SOS signals, crisp dialogue, a pan-freeze that screams out, and performances that leave you spell-bound—all within 7 min (approx). Agli Baar’s win in the Best Short Fiction Film category at the Mumbai International Film Festival (MIFF) was well deserved, and I am glad I caught it, albeit six months later.

Though he denies any influence of Anurag Kashyap, Makhija undoubtedly shows a penchant for choosing subjects that would identify with the choices of Kashyap, and, to an extent, Ramgopal Varma. He is a gifted writer too, as the screenplays and dialogues of his films suggest. Trimala Adhikari as the petrified Rukhsana is dynamite, Abhishek Banerjee as the killer Mahinder is terrorising, though he does pretty little (it is all cleverly conveyed), Gazal Dhaliwal provides the girl-friend’s off-screen voice effectively, the tried and tested Rasika Dugal plays an entirely convincing advocate Faiza, and Tushar Pandey makes the lout Javed come alive, completely uninhibited.

Rating: ****

Absent (the e is missing in the film’s title)

Theatre of the absurd, acted out as realistically as possible. A man on death row makes an impassioned plea to his Warden that he be allowed to see his daughter one last time. It was premièred in April, at a private venue, in Mumbai.

Iqbal talks about his little girl Aziza, recalling the time she emerged from his wife Shaheen's womb, “bum first”, about the day she walked for the first time, about the day she will get married. And how he has been missing these milestones.  Distraught, he now makes one last desperate attempt to get time-off to see her one last time, before going to the noose. But the off-screen warden remains unmoved.

Barely three lines break the monologue of Javed, most of it shot in tight close-up. As writer, Makhija remains ambivalent. You are drawn into sympathy by the character’s sheer intensity of delivery. At the same time, both the situation and the enactment are also farcical. Is he talking about human rights abuse here? Or is he poking fun at a recent real-life hanging of a man convicted for his role in the Mumbai blasts of over two decades ago? It is one location, with one on-screen actor, another who provides 2/3 lines of off-screen responses (the Warden) and the executioner, who just comes in at the end, as we see the noose and the hood. Unlike his other two films, there is definite end here. But his real story comes across as what happens before the events depicted in the film, and what was happening off-screen even as the hanging was taking place.

It is political dynamite, and though he is an activist, Makhija lets his film take only one skewed, weird, fictionalised historical excerpt from time within memory. As writer-director again, he is a little below par, after the high standard he set for himself in Agli Baar. Vikas Kumar, playing Iqbal, is a discovery. He can mouth inane, contrived, as well as heart-rending, emotive dialogue with equal élan. And in close-up, he is amazing too. It’s a great help that he is basically a dialogue coach. Hindi, Urdu and English flow easily from his chords.

While he needed the camera to say a lot of things in Agli Baar, in Absent, Devashish Makhija relies heavily on one actor. The title has confused many. One can hazard a guess and say that Iqbal was an absent parent, and regrets being so.

Rating: *** ½

El’Ayichi (Alternate title: Aise darraya mat karo/Don’t scare me like this)

After one straight and one metaphorical title, Makhija gives us a clever, stylised one. It is indeed cardamom that he is referring to, but in deference to the Mexican style of filming, that he takes-up towards the end, he breaks up the Hindi word elaichi (or elayichi) to read El’Ayichi, almost like El Dorado. He admits to using music that is a tribute to the Sergio Leone directed and Clint Eastwood starring Italian spaghetti Westerns of the late 60s/early 70s.

A woman keeps hallucinating about her dead husband, who keeps appearing as a life-like ghost and talks to her. The ghost tells her that he tried to commit suicide twice, but it did not work. A local train went through him the first time and even after jumping from a high-rise building, he suffered no injury. But how did he actually die? Good question, but not relevant. Do ghosts commit suicide? Maybe, suggests Makhija. The husband’s ghost follows her into the toilet and even enters her body, speaking through her moth in his own voice (sci-fi?). In the end, he asks her to check if their maid, who keeps shooting a mix of stupefied and ghostly looks at her, is a ghost too, like him. A jar of elayichi will decide, before the 4 min 55 sec. duration runs out.

El’Ayichi almost works as a black comedy, falling short, literally, by falling short. It’s too short to let the comedy sink in. As a bizarre ghost story, with humorous treatment (the toilet scene, him entering her body, the cowboy Western crescendo as she approaches Bindu in the kitchen, holding a burning cigarette), it does hold attention. And the idea of a ghost wanting to commit suicide is truly worth a laugh. Some influence has probably percolated down from the film versions of Vijaydan Detha’s rustic Rajasthani story, Duvidha, which was adapted into cinema twice.

Amol Palekar's Paheli (2005) is the story of Lachchi (Rani Mukerji), who is married to a man only interested in making money. A ghost (Shah Rukh Khan) falls madly in love with her. On the wedding night itself, the husband leaves home, for five long years, on business venture. The ghost takes on the husband's appearance and enters Lachchi's life. A few years later, when the husband returns home, the villagers and relatives are bewildered. How this situation gets resolved is the Paheli.

In Detha's original tale, the story ends on a less dramatic note. A wise shepherd tricks the ghost into a bag that is thrown into a deep well and the real husband returns home in triumph.

His wife silently picks up her homely tasks again with tragic submission, for it is the ghost whom she loves.

Mani Kaul filmed it in 1973, with an unknown cast (Ravi Menon, Raisa Padamsee). The film is set in rural Rajasthan, and relates a popular folk-tale about a merchant’s son, Krishanlal, whose relationship with his young bride, Lachhi, is thwarted by his work, and a ghost, who falls in love with her, resulting in the ghost soon impersonating the missing husband.

For those who don’t ‘get it’, and wonder what the ‘ghost of an idea’ was, Makhija, at the post-screening Q &A, cited two master directors: French New Wave pioneer Jean-Luc Godard and Iranian legend Abbas Kiarostami (Kiarostami had passed away the previous day). Godard agreed that every film should have a beginning, middle and an end, but not necessarily in that order. Kiarostami, when asked why his films ended at points where there was no real ending or resolution, and he said, “But the story does not end there. It continues outside the film!”

As is his norm, Makhija hand-picks his cast and gets the best out of them. Nimrat Kaur (Lunch-box, Airlift) and Divyendu Sharma (Pyar ka Punchnama, Chashme Baddoor, Ekkees Toppon Ki Salami) are right there. Divyendu evokes sympathy, though it is suggested that the character is a loser or a bad husband or both. Vibha Chibber (Chak De! India, Saawariya, Ghajini, Jolly LL.B.) is given just a couple of lines, but it is the couple of eyes that create the ambience.

Rating: ***

On Tuesday, 12th July, at the G5A-NYIFF, you can see

The Threshold (Winner – Best Actor and Best Actress, at NYIFF)

(Not to be confused with the Marathi short, Daaravtha, screened earlier at this festival. Daaravtha, in Marathi, is also translated as The Threshold)

Director – Pushan Kriplani

Cast – Neena Gupta, Rajit Kapur

Hindi | 87 mins

A North Indian couple, in their early 60s, at their mountain retreat. Their son has just gotten married, a reception has ended and all the guests have left. She chooses this moment to tell her husband that she is leaving. What follows is an endless day: the avalanche of this long-gathering decision and what it means to a decades-long relationship. Fragments of conversations, silence and chaos, as nostalgia mingles with menace and tenderness with cruelty. What will they succeed in rescuing against the landslide of memory and emotion?

 *Post Screening Q&A with actor Neena Gupta and Producer Akshat Shah

G5A-NYIFF Film Festival Reviews: Daaravtha (Marathi for Threshold)

$
0
0

G5A-NYIFF Film Festival Reviews: Daaravtha (Marathi for Threshold)

Here’s one more winner screened at ongoing the G5A-NYIFF Film Festival: Best Debut Film of a Director at the 63rd National Film Awards in the Non Feature Film category. It’s a 30-minute short fiction, a coming of age and discovering homosexuality parallelism, that pieces together real-life experiences of several gay men into a sensitive collage. If it does not make you sit up and applaud, while impressing you with its exquisite narrative tapestry, the fault lies partly with the hype,  partly with the stock nature montage beginning and the claptrap ending.

On the brink of adolescence, a young boy struggles between his own desires and the confines of a strict patriarchal society in rural Maharashtra. He is fascinated by nature, loves dance, mehndi (henna) and jewellery. Mesmerised by the beautiful costumes and spell-binding dancing in his school’s play kathak based play on Vishnu-Mohini, he is delighted when he is offered the female lead role, especially since this is his chance to finally get closer to the older boy, the main actor, on whom he’s been harbouring a secret crush.

Shot all over Gondia district in the Vidarbha region of Maharashtra, he where he experienced intense homophobic scrutiny. Bombarde has captured the locales and society as only a native can.

After working with Zee TV for three years, he shifted to Zee Studios, where he heads digital media promotions and works as an executive producer. Among other projects, he has served as executive producer on the raved Marathi films Killa, Fandry and Elizabeth Ekadashi. Nishant has recently worked as an actor and director’s associate on Dushyantapriya, a queer adaptation of Kalidasa’s Shakuntalam. In the original, Dushyant is the King who falls for the forest belle, Shakuntala. He has done the costumes too, as he explained to this writer in Q&A, “The designer ditched us last minute. Maybe money was the issue (the film has cost only Rs. 5 lakh/approx. USD7,500 to make). However, since I believe costumes are a part of the character’s personality, I did not face much difficulty.

Bombarde recreates the 90s era with the help of music and radio broadcasts, and insists that in any story about the 1990s, Sreedevi has to be there (you have the ‘Mere haathon men’ clip from Chandni). With the best of intentions, de incorporates a complex kathak ballet about a little known story of Hindu mythology, involving Vishnu and Mohini. Imaginatively and inventively choreographed, it needs background awareness to comprehend. A student of Symbiosis Institute of Media and Communication (SIMC), Bombarde retained the services of Anadi Atahaley, who studied a few kms away, at the Film and Television Institute of India. Daaravtha took much longer than a 30 min film should have taken, to edit, and there were some areas of conflict between director and editor, the two confessed at the Q&A. Not all the variation in pace are convincing, yet the editing is above par.

Two main actors really stand out: Nandita Patkar (Elizabeth Ekadashi) as the mother and Nishant Bhavsar, selected after a disappointing audition, as the 12 year-old boy. They are well supported by Sanjay Purkar, Anurag Worlikar, Vidushri Ruchi Sharma and Sumedha Rangari. Special mention needs to be made of Shantanu Herlekar’s musical score.

This day, July 05, attracted a sparse audience, and understandably so. Four films, the longest of which is 30 minutes, in Marathi, and about the first realisation of by a boy of his homosexuality, are not popular fare. By contrast, the Balck Box was almost full when Kadambari (a biographical episode from the life of RabindranathTagore/Bengali/Konkona SenSharma) was shown, a couple of days later.

Rating: ***

Priyanka Charan conducted the Q&A.

Trailer: https://www.facebook.com/Daaravtha/videos/vb.791824640946461/826808447448080/?type=2&theater

Nishant Roy Bombarde, talking about Daaravtha at Indian Film Festival of Los Angeles (IFFLA), where it was premièred.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TECA2MY5yCw

On Tuesday, 12th July, at the G5A-NYIFF, you can see

The Threshold (Winner – Best Actor and Best Actress, at NYIFF)

(Not to be confused with the Marathi short, Daaravtha, screened earlier at this festival, and reviewed above. Daaravtha, in Marathi, is also translated as The Threshold)

Director – Pushan Kriplani

Cast – Neena Gupta, Rajit Kapur

Hindi | 87 mins

A North Indian couple, in their early 60s, at their mountain retreat. Their son has just gotten married, a reception has ended and all the guests have left. She chooses this moment to tell her husband that she is leaving. What follows is an endless day: the avalanche of this long-gathering decision and what it means to a decades-long relationship. Fragments of conversations, silence and chaos, as nostalgia mingles with menace and tenderness with cruelty. What will they succeed in rescuing against the landslide of memory and emotion?

 *Post Screening Q&A with actor Neena Gupta and Producer Akshat Shah.

Great Grand Masti, Review: Grate Bland Cesti

$
0
0

Great Grand Masti, Review: Grate Bland Cesti

Amar, Meet and Prem.

"Amar, meet Prem!"

Riteish Deshmukh, Vivek Oberoi, Aftab Shivdasani.

Sapna, Rekha, Nisha.

Dream-Line-Night.

Pooja Bose, Mishti, Shraddha Das.

Mother-in-law, Sister-in-law.

Shrew-brew-slew, Three into two won’t do.

Usha Nadkarni, Kangna Sharma.

Antakshari Baba, Babu Rangeela.

Ba ba black sheep, Cock-a-doodle-doo.

Sanjay Mishra, Shreyas Talpade (Special Appearance).

Shiney, the maid; Ramsay, the blanket-hood.

Milkmaid, Stock-in-trade; Wet blanket, Hoodwinker.

Sonali Raut,  Sudesh (stand-up comic) Lehri (both cameos).

Ragini (SMS): Host, Ghost, Accost, Utmost, Foremost, Rearmost, Hindmost, Innermost, Midmost, Outmost, Bedpost

Urvashi Rautela

(On 15 July 2016, actor Shiney Ahuja sent a legal notice to the film's producers accusing them of criminal contempt for naming a maid Shiney in the film, alleging that this was a reference to Ahuja's 2011 conviction for raping a maid in his employ).

Indra Kumar, director

Dil (1990)

Beta (1992)

Raja (1995)

Ishq (1997)

Mann (1999)

Aashiq (2001)

Rishtey (2002)

Masti (2004)

Pyare Mohan (2006)

Dhamaal (2007)

Double Dhamaal (2011)

Grand Masti (2013)

Super Nani (2014)

Great Grand Masti (2016)?

 

Tushar Hiranandani, story.

Cut and paste, Add to taste, Post-haste, Distaste, Waste. 

Sourcing, Outsourcing.

Head of content development. Content Elopment?

41st birthday, 13 July. Great Grand Masti releases 15 July.

Gift? Rift? Adrift?

 

Madhur Sharma and Aakash Kaushik, Screenplay.

Foreplay, Replay, Display, Wordplay, Overplay, Horseplay.

Rhyming, hyming, yming, ming, ing.

 

Masti, Grand Masti, Great Grand Masti

Sasti, Pasti, Zabardasti

Trilogy, Strilogy, Sexology, Tautology, Phenkology, Bhootology, Viagralogy, Vulgaralogy, Motherinlawgy, Sisterinlawgy, Doublemeaningology, Rubblemeaningology.

Lo Jee!

But you laughed, didn’t you?

Rating: *

Trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZojV0FC-KdI


NYIFF-G5A Film Festival Reviews, Kadambari: Platonic tonic and poetic injustice

$
0
0

NYIFF-G5A Film Festival Reviews, Kadambari: Platonic tonic and poetic injustice

Literally, ‘of/from the Kadamba tree’, the word kadambari (kaadambari in Hindi and kaadambori in Bengali) lends itself to many meanings. The most ancient reference to this work is as an intricate romantic novel, in Sanskrit. Several films have been made with this title, including some in Hindi. This one is about a real-life character called Kadambari, who was the sister-in-law of India’s literary giant and composer of the national anthem, Rabindranath Tagore. In Hindi, the name is written as Ravindranath Thakur, with the long first name often abbreviated to Ravi (Robi Thakur in Bengali).

Made by an Indian film-maker living in Florida, Suman Ghosh, Kadambari was screened at the Black Box, Mahalaxmi, Mumbai, on 7 July, as part of the NYIFF-G5A Film Festival. G5A is a not-for-profit organisation that ‘supports contemporary art and culture, good governance and sustainability’. Screenings began in June and are held twice a week, on Tuesdays and Thursdays, late evenings. This is the last week of the hand-picked bouquet, with screenings on the 19th and 21st of July marking the finalé.

Called “My Queen” by Tagore, Kadambari Devi was the wife of out-going Jyotirindranath Tagore, one of his older brothers, and daughter-in-law of Debendranath Tagore, his stern father. She was nine years younger than her husband, whom she married in 1868, when she was nine or 10 years old. Quite the norm, those days, and in those parts. Rabindranath was about seven or eight. Fifteen years later, Robi married Mrinalini Devi, and within four months of this marriage, Kadambari was dead. That is the point at which the film begins, in a semi thriller style, as a door is broken down, and her body is found sprawling on the bed. Murder? No! Suicide? Yes. Heart-break? Yes, but not why you thought.

She inspired the poet in young Rabindranath, with her creative and candid feedback and comments. Quite naturally, he dedicated his poems, composed between the ages of 13 and 18, to Kadambari. She was also a good friend, and playmate. They often played chess and had poetry sessions, with renowned invitees. It all began when he saw her the first time, as the stepped out of the palanquin and came into their house, as the the ‘notun bou’ (new bride), a girl with "thin gold bangles on her tender dark wrists," whom he "circled from afar, afraid to come close". This is very well recreated in the film.

Yet, her relationship with the man who was to become the bard of Bengal, was controversial, and had tragic elements. After Kadambari Devi's death, Rabindranath was completely broken. For long, he wrote many songs and poems, in her memory. The Tagore family always remained silent about the circumstances of her death. Suman Ghosh gives an explicit reason: her husband’s affair with a theatre starlet, and the news of the woman carrying his child. Is this closure, as far as the secret of the Tagore family scandal is concerned? Even if t is, it comes some 125 years after the reasons of her death were hushed-up by the Tagore patriarch, or so avers Ghosh.

Any film of this nature, about a titan like Tagore, cannot but be an amalgam of information culled from various sources, distilled by the director. Ghosh takes credit for the script, but there are substantial elements from Prothom Alo (first flame/light), by Sunil Gangopadhyay, and, as was earlier reported, a novella on Kadambari, by Ranjan Bandopadhyay. Tagore’s own writings provide the most authentic source of his feelings and inspiration. It is impossible to segregate the ingredients, and apportion credit, but the resulting dish is poetic, palatable and picturesque.

Suman Ghosh received his film training at the Department of Theatre, Film and Dance, at Cornell University. Podokkhep (Footsteps) was his debut feature film. He also directed Dwando,  Nobel Chor (Nobel Thief) and Shyamal Uncle Turns Off the Lights. An Associate Professor of Economics at the Florida Atlantic University, who made his first film on a present-day Nobel laureate, Amartya Sen, Ghosh is treading down the path much travelled, by legendary directors like Tapan Sinha and Satyajit Ray. They all adapted Nobel awardee Tagore’s works into screenplays, usually with remarkable success. (Inescapably, there is something about ‘Nobel’ that fascinates Ghosh). "Like every film-maker, I ,too, have always been interested in making a film on his works. However, I decided that I would adapt a Tagore story on celluloid only if I am able to make a significant change in the genre, and in the presentation of the story. I don't want to make a mockery of one of his stories."

 

Mockery it is certainly not. Classicism, it almost is. Romanticism it certainly is. Consciously or sub-consciously, Ghosh navigates his horse-carriage down the path paved by ‘literature in cinema’ specialists Ismail Merchant-James Ivory, and a bunch of British makers, while adapting several English period novels. In his favour, he manages to steer clear of the ennui that such forays inadvertently end-up generating, often lulling viewers into forty-winks..

Konkona Sen Sharma as Kadambari is a bit of a let-down. Blame it on high expectations. Attribute it to unvarying dialogue delivery over a succession of films, with a half surprised, half bored look that she seems to be stuck with. Co-incidentally, Shesher Kobita (The Last Poem), among Tagore’s most acclaimed stories, was released around the same time as Kadambari, in which Konkona was again a lead player, along with her (much-lauded Hindi film) Mr. and Mrs. Iyer co-star, Rahul Bose. Both Konkona and Rahul are half-Bengalis! Shesher Kobita was directed by another Suman (Mukhopadhyay), and found wide acceptance.

Parambrata Chatterjee as Rabindranath Tagore is in control and smooth. It is the much more challenging role, when you think of the viewers who know little or nothing about kadambari, but a fair bit about the poet/musician/playwright, whose memory is perpetuated in the shape of a University in Bengal, among all the other, innumerable, revered relics. Chatterjee has acted in a number of Hindi films, including Kahaani, Gang of Ghosts and Yara Sillly Silly.

In native Bengali, he was seen in Bombaiyer Bombete, The Bong Connection, Dosar, Baishe Srabon, Hemlock Society and Apur Panchali. He has also directed Jiyo Kaka, Hawa Bodol and Lorai: Play to Live. Although his beard needed more attention from the make-up department, he makes-up by giving adequate attention to characterisation and building of the persona. Support comes in good quality, from Kaushik Sen as Jyotirindranath, Titash Bhowmik as Gnanadanandini and Sanjoy Nag as Debendranath Tagore.

Music by Bickram Ghosh, Cinematography   by Barun Mukherjee and Editing by Sujay Datta –Ray, are of a high order. Proceedings do tend to drag a bit, especially since the tale sets off at a frenetic pace, and then unfolds languorously. And yet, the makers must have had to either cut out or exclude so much that could easily find place in any Tagore story, especially if it is a biographical (or auto-biographical) one, as Kadambari is.

Rating: *** ½

Trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLcUlgf5ZAg

Some of the G5A team (The top of  top brass have been mentioned in an earlier piece, and something is being planned with them.

These are the hands on brass)

*Anupama Bose

Group Head, New Initiatives

(Also Curator of the festival, regular in-house compère and presenter. Feels that I should have covered the festival “better” and “differently”; is delighted with my analytical review of Agli Baar and goes on to ask its director, Devashish Makhija, to “take a bow”).

*Rajashree Menon

Group Head, Communications and Business Development

(Ever so keen to get maximum exposure and coverage of this ‘start-up event, which had low turnout and not much media mileage. Kadambari was the exception).

*Priyanka

Senior Manager, Projects and Programs

(Radiant one)

*Suruchi Pawar

Manager, Communications and Development

(Radiant too)

*Ashok Shinde

Assistant Manager, Projects

*Sunita Chauhan

Project Coordinator

(Radiant 3. No, I cannot put a face to the name. Just guessing).

*Vishaal Mistry

Manager, Events + Facility

(You need a big fixer at such events)

*Vivek Belwate

Assistant Manager, Events + Facility

(You need to apply wisdom to facilitate such events)

*Carol Misquitta

Assistant Co-ordinator, Facility

(Offers a ready smile, almost ready reviving cup of hot tea and a beautiful umbrella completely ready for the foreseeable eventuality, which she does not offer)

*Rakesh Wagh

Security Supervisor, Facility

(Who better than a Wagh at this position?)

*Mujeeb Dadarkar

Technical Consultant

(Very familiar name. Was he in theatre?)

*Vijay Benegal

Technical Consultant

(It’s a technical knock-out victory when you have him)

*David Pinto

Assistant Sound Engineer

(He might have to throw a pin to the floor to hear silent it is)

*Sopan Borkar

Assistant Tech, Facility

(Connections? Lights? Camera? What’s  working now counts. If something is going the other way, so pan it back!

*Gaus Sheikh

Assistant Electrician, Faciltiy

(Largely good work. Sometimes, takes the heat on screen too seriously and brings the A/C down to 16°)

*Kurumayya Kari

Assistant Electrician, Faciltiy

(Largely, fine job. Sometimes, confuses the name of the film on screen, as Ice Age, and atsrts getting realistic.  

 

***And at least three un-named café staff, who perform their duties affably.

 

If I jumbled some names or some names escaped me, blame the G5A website.

I missed Monument Man, got immersed in The Threshold but had to catch a Hindi film review, more so because they are not, as a routine, open to inviting me to Hindi films. Had to sacrifice Monument Man, on my favourite director Kasnnada, director, Girish Kasaravally,

With a  strategic U turn, I’ll bet back to the venue.

NYIFF-G5A Film Festival Reviews, The Threshold: I’ll take your leave

$
0
0

 

NYIFF-G5A Film Festival Reviews, The Threshold: I’ll take your leave

A good old joke goes like this:

An ideal marriage is one wherein two people become one.

The problems arise when they want to decide which one.

It goes without saying that marriage is no joke, and two people can never really become one. I have seen a couple that was telepathically on the same wave-length and usually spoke the same words in unison, without any previous arrangement to this end, go through a bitter divorce. And we all have seen some husbands and wives celebrate their diamond anniversary like blushing teenagers.

If there is a separation on the cards, either a divorce or a staying apart arrangement, where, when and how does it all begin? How do two persons, apparently happily married, suddenly find themselves on the threshold, at the beginning of the end? Cinematographer and theatre figure Pushan Kripalani draws on Russian and American plays about relationships under scanners, and maybe that wee bit form Ingmar Bergman’s Scenes from a Marriage, to present a tale which is as real as it gets, and as performance-driven as any palpably pulsating drama.  

Married for about twenty-five years, a North Indian couple, around 60, are all set for separation the day after their son’s wedding reception at their mountain getaway, because the wife suddenly says she wants to leave him and go away the next morning. This declaration opens up a marathon conversation that proceeds into an endless day. Even as the couple, mainly the man, tries to get to the heart of the matter, they find the big questions of their lives beyond their grasp. They are two people, isolated in a house in the hills, preparing for the harsh Himalayan winter, confronting an existential crisis, and trying to find themselves, one last time.

After the screening, cinematographer, director and part writer Pushan Kripalani revealed on Skype that lyricist-writer Kausar Munir came up with the story premise trigger that a wife decides to leave her husband the day after their son gets married. Actors Rajit Kapur and Neena Gupta then dug into their own real-life experiences, as did Kripalani himself, which provided the raw material that Nihaarika Negi [Labours of (an)Other Solipsist; yes a such a word does exist] then wove into a screenplay. Pushan has said about the two characters, “They are our aunts and uncles. They are our parents. They are our grandparents. We will become them.”

The Threshold is a good example of theatre blending with cinema, with a cleverly inter-woven outdoor locale and just about enough camera movement to make it relevant to the screen. Two cameras have been used, both hand-held, of which one is trained and moved with cinematic precision, while the other is slightly shaky and seems to improvise. When asked about this dichotomy, Pushan replied, “I must be getting old, and so the camera shakes.” He was obviously joking. Otherwise, there is great fluidity and imagination at play, both behind the lens and at the megaphone.

All due credit must be given to the years he has spent in theatre, doing direction, acting, music and lighting, in a score of plays, including directing Girsih Karnad’s Hayavadana, the one that made some of the Threshold team put their faith in his film-making abilities. Pushan, who studied in Mumbai and Bristol, is the son of theatre, television and film veteran, Jayant Kripalani, and Gulan, who were both in advertising at one time. Jayant had played Neena Gupta’s husband in the TV hit, Khandan (1985-86), so the connection has been renewed by a next generation Kripalani, exactly 30 years later. And recently, Pushan did the lighting for an event that was conceived and directed by Rajit Kapur. Maybe that got them talking about the Threshold. Anyway, both are die-hard theatre-bugs.

Nihaarika Negi’s microscopic pen (read keyboard) pervades both sensitivities in equal measure, male and female. Not many 87-minute conversations can keep you engaged, so Negi deserves an encomium. After you have seen it all, your sympathies surprisingly tilt towards the husband, the more practical and less scrupulous of the two. Is it because he is the one left behind while she moves on? Or ,is it because he strips his soul bare, albeit one layer at a time, while she seems unsure, and the logic for her momentous decision remains a little nebulous? Open-ended stories are the stuff that keeps audiences’ grey-cells in conjectural overdrive, while the writer/director can just add the disclaimer, “What you saw is what you got!” Now far the performances of the two central players in this screen debut of the much younger Pushan.

 

Rajit Kapur rocks. Physically, emotionally, reactively, it’s a treat to watch him bare his soul in stages, warts and all, still hang on to his convictions about his questionable motives and self-centred manliness. Ambivalence is a constant, as he keeps conveying alternately that he needs her to feel complete, and also that he finds it outrageous that his wife could actually decide to leave him, so she should consider changing her mind. The only comment I have to make is that he sounds so much like Om Puri, the master actor, 10 years his senior. His Punjabi and the occasional expletive progress and intertwine seamlessly. I wish there was more of Punjabi, in keeping with the tone of the film. If Kapur ever had the trace of self-consciousness in his acting, this film has seen the end of it. There is no question about Rajit and Neena deserving the Best Actor and Best Actress prize for this movie at the New York International Film Festival (NYIFF) held a couple of months ago.

Both Rajit and Neena are the same age, and that would certainly have helped develop chemistry. Kripalani deglamourises both down to a level where you almost feel for the duo. Perhaps more so for Neena, for women tend to use make-up more than men, and actresses, in particular, are deeply concerned about image and looks. As Neena said, “I asked him to let me use just a little bit of lipstick, but he refused.” Gait, over-size sweater (she bought it herself), a scene where she is shown undoing her cummerbund--Neena rises way above any misgivings anyone might have had about her histrionics, and the word is not used here to denote over-dramatisation. Quite the opposite. One thing stays with her, though: her trade-mark stiff upper-lip and vocal quality that goes with a much younger woman, though the notes she strikes are all the right ones. Not having seen all her work, I will go with her when she says, “It’s the most beautiful work I have done so far.”

Kausar Munir comes in again as lyricist, suitably abstract songs, capably tuned by Tapas Relia. Sound Design by Baylon Fonseca and Dhiman Karmakar is bare and stark, with the pronounced sound of breathing filling-in very often for background music.

Pushan’s old friends Vishal Dhandhia and Akshat Shah have produced the film, for Blackboxers Productions.

A title that is fairly common, a Threshold having been made in the west almost in tandem, this vehicle crossed The Threshold for the first time at MAMI’s Mumbai Film Festival in October 2015. It is not the kind of film that will have many screenings, and a theatrical release looks like a remote possibility. But these days, there so many alternative platforms.

Rating: *** ½

Trailer:

Titbit

“Whenever I get nostalgic about Bengali food I get some good dab (also spelt daab) chingri from Hooghly,”

--Jayant Kripalani, in 2008, referring to a Bengali take-away that Pushan runs/ran in Mumbai. Jayant, the son a laundry-owner, was born and raised in Kolkata.

It was photographer Elisha Walia

It was Elisha's Walia birthday yesterday. She' the fair maiden flitting in an out, carrying a Canon and mono-pod. A bout of voral infetion did not deter her from coming to work on the 19th. I wasn't invited for the 29th bash (or has it been held over till today?). Will it spill over on the 21st? Hope so. meanwhile: HBTY< HBTY, HBDE, HBTY!

Bhayank Bombay

27 minutes 15 seconds, English and Hindi with English subtitles
Directors: Alia Sinha, Ankita Bhatkhande, Elisha Walia, Nishajyoti Sharma, Robin Zutshi

The city is not always what it seems to be. There is always a hidden element behind it. Enter a dark murky world of Deserted places, Accidental deaths, Big budget cinema, Urban hyper- development and stories of 500 year old revengeful ghosts. The city (Mumbai) has changed a lot in various terms. Bombay may have morphed into the Mega metropolitan of Mumbai but the spirit of the old city remains- and it is not very happy. Enter the world of “Bhayanak Bombay

Star Trek Beyond, Review: Nebulous Enterprise

$
0
0

Star Trek Beyond, Review: Nebulous Enterprise

On TV, Star Trek was conceived in 1966, as a weekly NBC series, running for three seasons. Graduation to the big screen was logical. Since 1979, we have had a dozen treks so far, and here comes the 13th Enterprise, marking the golden jubilee year, and spelling the end of star-billed Starship Enterprise, its literal destruction. The film is disruptive in plot, personal in dramatisation and modest in special effects.

Three years after its five-year voyage began, the USS Enterprise arrives at Starbase Yorktown (which I heard as Your Town every time), to replenish dwindling supplies while the crew takes shore leave. Finding his duties as Captain growing monotonous, James Kirk (Chris Pine) applies for a promotion to Vice Admiral. Meanwhile, Commander Spock (Zachary Quinto), the Vulcan, and Nyota Uhura (Zoe Saldana), the couple in love, deal with the end of their relationship; Hikaru Sulu (John Cho), then pilot,  reunites with his husband (Sulu is gay) and their young daughter; and Montgomery Scott (Simon Pegg) struggles to keep the ship operational.

When an escape pod drifts out of a nearby nebula and its sole occupant, Kalara, claims her ship is stranded on another planet, the Enterprise is despatched, only to be attacked by a swarm of drone ships. The swarm's commander, an alien warlord known as Krall, boards Enterprise, in order to retrieve an alien artefact, stored on board. However, Kirk gets to the artefact first and gets it hidden, before ordering that the crew to evacuate. As the crew evacuates, most of their escape pods are captured by the drone ships.

Uhura separates the Enterprise's saucer section, enabling it to crash-land on the planet below, but she is captured by Krall, and brought to his home base on the planet's surface, along with Sulu, and the rest of the captive crew. Along with the drone forces, Krall has alien technology that he uses to rejuvenate his body, by draining the life from his captives, and has been planning for centuries, to strike at the Federation. The alien artefact is the final component of a four-part bio-weapon he intends to unleash aboard Yorktown.

Simon Pegg and Doug Jung look at Star Trek creator Gene Roddenberry’s vision, and question it . Says Pegg, “You know, the whole notion of the Federation and whether it’s a good thing or a bad thing, or how productive is inclusivity. What is the true cost of expansion, that kind of stuff. So we went in with some big, philosophical questions to ask.” Not a bad ploy. Except that the timing is suspect, what with the heroics of the Marvel heroes being questioned by the American government, just a few months ago, in a superhero movie.

Back in 2013, Roberto Orci had begun writing the script, with Patrick McKay and John D. Payne, and was also to direct. Then, Orci dropped out of the project. His script, too, was shelved. Pegg and Jung, who had never worked together, had to deliver a shooting draft in a mere five months, so that the film could be released on July 22, as scheduled, just a few weeks prior to September's 50th anniversary of Star Trek. Pegg was asked to make the story more inclusive. In the original timeline, Sulu wasn't shown in any relationships, but in the film Star Trek Generations, it was revealed that he had a daughter. Now, he has a husband and a daughter. George Takei, who played Sulu in the original series, is himself gay.

Into Darkness, the last outing, was ranked very low on the Trek chart, and probably that is why J.J. Abrams, who had helmed it, decided to stick to co-producing it. (Actor Leonard Nimoy, who directed two Star Trek films, and was synonymous with the franchise, as the Vulcan, Spock, is no more). Wielding the megaphone this time around is Justin Lin. Taiwan-born, America-educated, Lin will turn 45 this October.

Known for Fast and Furious x 4, Highlander, Annapolis, he would watch episodes of Star Trek with his dad, a Taiwanese immigrant, who worked long hours at his Californian restaurant. He could not play too much with the dramatis personae, so he has subverted the plot instead. His love for the series is palpable, though. A clear human dimension is given to every character, and the razzle-dazzle, ant-colony like drone ships and rattle-tattle of ammo do not interrupt the narrative too often. Whenever they, however, it is a generous doses. Said Lin, “I feel like it’s important to maybe try to deconstruct why Federation, Starfleet, and why Star Trek is special. And, hopefully, at the end of it we reaffirm why it’s been around that long. And hopefully we can help keep it going.”

Chris Pine (The Princess Diaries 2: Royal Engagement, Just My Luck, Smoking Aces) has a presence that is more gentlemanly than authoritative. Zachary Quinto (6’ 4”; What’s Your Number, Margin Call, Girls Walks Into a Bar) as Commander Spock, first officer and science officer, steps in to fill the original Spock’s ears...er...shoes, rebranding the late, lamented Vulcan as Spock Prime. The two enjoy good rapport. Zoe Saldana (Avatar, Death at a Funeral, The Losers and Takers, Colombiana, The Words, Guardians of the Galaxy) as Lieutenant Nyota Uhura, the communications officer, keeps her affection for Spock just that much sublime and platonic. Karl Urban (Dredd, Lord of the Rings, Chronicles of Riddick) as Leonard McCoy, MD, chief medical officer, brings along a much-needed funny track in the scenes with the purely logical and quaintly quirky Spock.

Anton Yelchin (Terminator Salvation, Charlie Bartlett, Like Crazy Then) plays Ensign Pavel Chekov, ship's main navigator, with a classic surname and a scrambled Russian accent, though he is never short of the requisite skills. (You might have read that on June 19, 2016, Yelchin was killed in a car accident in California. He was only 27. The film was dedicated to his memory). Idris Elba (Thor, Avengers, Mandela) is the alien villain, Krall, part human, part reptile, determined to bring down the Federation. Though his motivation, equation with his alien followers and transformation into human form are not satisfactorily explained, he is too good an actor to let this come in his way. With a mask throughout the film, which comes off only in the climax, Elba manages to hold fort.

Simon Pegg as Lieutenant Commander Montgomery Scott, second officer and chief engineer, runs around breathlessly, trying to beat the clock, but seems to be pining for comic moments.

Sofia Boutella (the villain/vamp in Kingsman: The Secret Service) as Jaylah, the alien guardian of USS Franklin, has a meaty role, as ill-defined as that of Krall. She, too, makes the most of what is on offer. Good old Leonard Nimoy, whose voice has now been stilled forever, gazes at us from a photo still, evoking memories of years/decades gone by.

Joe Taslim as Manas, Deep Roy as the miniature man Keenser and Harpreet Sandhu have Indian/South Asian sounding names. Unfortunately, there is little else to write home about them.

Star Trek Beyond does indeed move ahead from the familiar universe. How one wishes they had been more Enterprising than nebulous.

Rating: ***

Trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bzD8H6o1awQ

 

Gene Rodenberry (excerpted from the official website)

As creator and producer of the original Star Trek television series, he launched a phenomenon without precedent in show business and attained a celebrity status unique among his peers. He spoke on the subject at NASA meetings, the Smithsonian Institution, Library of Congress gatherings, and top universities. As creator of the beloved Starship Enterprise and its crew, which included the heroic Captain Kirk and the logical Vulcan, Mr. Spock, Roddenberry unwittingly unleashed a phenomenon in which Star Trek enthusiasts became a veritable cult, numbering physicists, aerospace engineers, housewives, senators, children, teachers and intellectuals among its devotees (affectionately known as "Trekkies," and later, "Trekkers").

The show went outside television to win science fiction's coveted Hugo Award, and then spawned an animated spin-off, as well as a series of feature films. He was born in El Paso, Texas, on August 19, 1921, spent his boyhood in Los Angeles, studied three years of policemanship and then transferred his academic interest to aeronautical engineering and qualified for a pilot's license. He volunteered for the U.S. Army Air Corps in the fall of 1941 and was ordered into training as a flying cadet when the United States entered World War II. Emerging from Kelly Field, Texas, as a Second Lieutenant, Roddenberry was sent to the South Pacific, flying B-17 bombers out of the newly-captured Japanese airstrip, which became Henderson Field. In all, he took part in approximately 89 missions and sorties. He was decorated with the Distinguished Flying Cross and the Air Medal.

While in the South Pacific, he also began to write. He sold stories to flying magazines, and later poetry to publications, including The New York Times. At war's end, he joined Pan American World Airways. During this time, he also studied literature at Columbia University.

It was on a flight from Calcutta that his plane lost two engines and caught fire in mid-air, crashing at night in the Syrian desert. As the senior surviving officer, Roddenberry sent two Englishmen swimming across the Euphrates River, in quest of the source of a light he had observed just prior to the crash.

The Englishmen reached a Syrian military outpost, which sent a small plane to investigate. Roddenberry returned with the small plane to the outpost, where he broadcast a message that was relayed to Pan Am, which sent a stretcher plane to the rescue. Roddenberry later received a Civil Aeronautics commendation for his efforts during and after the crash.* (See below).

Back in the States, Roddenberry continued flying until he saw television for the first time. At a friend's suggestion, he joined the Los Angeles Police Department, following in his father's footsteps and gaining experiences which would be valuable to a writer. By the time he had become a sergeant, Roddenberry was selling scripts to such shows as Goodyear Theatre, The Kaiser Aluminum Hour, Four Star Theater, Dragnet, The Jane Wyman Theatre and Naked City.

Established as a writer, he turned in his badge and became a freelancer. Later, he served as head writer for the highly popular series Have Gun, Will Travel. His episode "Helen of Abiginian" won the Writers Guild Award and was distributed to other writers as a model script for the series. Next, he created and produced The Lieutenant series, starring Gary Lockwood and Robert Vaughn; it told the story of a young man learning the lessons of life while in the United States Marine Corps. Star Trek followed (1966-1969).

Star Trek developed a loyal following and has since become the first television series to have an episode preserved in the Smithsonian, where an 11-foot model of the U.S.S. Enterprise is also exhibited on the same floor as the Wright brothers' original airplane and Lindbergh's "Spirit of St. Louis." In addition to the Smithsonian honours, NASA's first space shuttle was named Enterprise, in response to hundreds of thousands of letters from fans demanding that the shuttle be named after the beloved starship. After the Star Trek series ended, Roddenberry produced the motion picture "Pretty Maids All in a Row," starring Rock Hudson, Angie Dickinson and Telly Savalas, and also made a number of pilots for TV.

On October 24, 1991, Gene Roddenberry passed away and a world not so far away mourned the loss of one of television's foremost pioneers.

 

*From plane crashinfo.com

June 19, 1947

Time:    23:40

Location:          Al Mayadin, Syria

Operator:         Pan American World Airways

Flight #:            121

Route:  Karachi – Istanbul (The previous halt might have been in Calcutta. Karachi lies between Calcutta and Istanbul)

AC Type:         Lockheed 049-46-21 Constellation

Registration:      NC88845

cn / ln:  2045

Aboard:            36   (passengers: 27, crew: 9)

Fatalities:          14   (passengers: 7, crew: 7)

Ground:            0

Summary: While on a flight originating in New York and making its inaugural west-bound flight of round-the-world service, the aircraft's No. 1 engine failed half-way on a leg from Karachi to Istanbul. Due to closed airports and inadequate repair facilities, the pilot chose to continue to its destination. Several hours later, the remaining engines overheated and the No.2 engine caught fire, causing the plane to crash. Gene Roddenberry (creator of Star Trek) was a dead-heading Pan Am pilot aboard, who helped rescue many of the passengers. The crash was blamed on Pan Am's failure to replace the No. 2 engine, which had experienced several problems earlier. A fire which resulted from an attempt to feather the No. 2 propeller after the failure of the No. 2 engine thrust bearing. The aircraft was named Clipper Eclipse.

NYIFF-G5A Film Festival Reviews, U Turn: Highway is my way

$
0
0

NYIFF-G5A Film Festival Reviews, U Turn: Highway is my way

In many ways, the choice of U Turn as the penultimate screening of the NYIFF-G5A Film Society’s Film Festival, the first ever Mumbai edition of the annual event, held 7,793.27 miles/12,560 km/16 hours flying time away, was a U Turn, compared to the kind of films they had been showing for the four preceding weeks. Symbolically, the idea of the festival is itself a U Turn, since all the films are Indian, sourced from NYIFF. Coal to Newcastle-upon-Tyne? So what? At least I am not complaining. Almost all the films are ones that I had not seen, and the quality they proffered was more than serviceable. The only time we hit a road block was with the Kannada film U Turn (English sub-titles), which just about managed to avoid potholes and kept driving along uncharted territory, using a self-devised GPS navigator.

A reporter, Rachana (Shraddha Srinath), interning with the New Indian Express, Bengaluru, has a crush on the crime reporter Aditya (Dilip Raj), whose help she seeks for research material on accidents on a flyover. For a ‘fee’, a hobo who dwells on the edges of the road, notes down the vehicle numbers of transgressors, who move divider stones and take the U-turn, and gives them to Rachana every day. She obtains further the details of such culprits, using her contact in the traffic department, with the intention of confronting them for their illegal, hazardous "short-cut", and thereby making a news story.

Unintentionally, Rachana gets entangled in a murder case. Even as she is questioned by the cops, things get only worse, and what began as a one-off, composite article, now finds her being framed for the very cases that she is investigating. In an uncanny sequence of events, all drivers end up dead, within hours of their U Turn, with no indications of foul-play, and suicide presumed. Rachana is the prime accused, because she is the only common link, and has been recorded visiting one of them. Enter a Sub-Inspector, Nayak (Roger Narayan), who believes her, and wants to help her find the truth.

Writer-director Pawan Kumar made his debut in Kannada films in 2011, with Lifeu Ishtene, which was a box office success. He chose to take the route of crowd-funding for his next project, Lucia, which has become a kind of cult film. U Turn is made with the money invested by some 65 individuals, forming Pawan Kumar Studios, and all these share-holders have been designated Honorary Producers in the credits. That’s a first. It was nominated for the best screenplay at NYIFF, and maybe deservedly so. Kumar shows remarkable merit in weaving disparate elements into a dimensionally whole fabric. Most parts, however, remain separated from the others.

An appealing, slice-of-life beginning gets you smiling, even chuckling. It has no bearing at all on the rest of the film. Long parallel cutting soon follows, which is exciting in itself, but builds up to nothing. After choosing an apparently trivial but definitely ethic/civic issue, he then proceeds to turn the plot into a murder mystery, replete with red herrings and whodunit tropes, and in the biggest jolt to the viewer, brings in the super-natural, in present-day, dream and flash-forward formats. One would expect that ghosts on a revenge-spree would know who did what, not target innocents, before they unleash their, but not so in this case. U Turn is a very complex film, though writer-director Pawan Kumar would like to believe otherwise.

There are many shots that look awesome. Sit back and analyse, and then you feel you’ve been taken for granted. Though claimed to be based on real incidents, it fails that test by a wide margin. What’s more, even the New Indian Express ( a real daily published from Bengaluru, among other places) link, and even the paper clipping that flashes on the screen in the end, which could have validated the exercise, are all concocted. Noticing traffic offences and being concerned about the potential threats they pose o life and limb are laudable examples of civic consciousness, not a platform to launch a flight of fantasy. In U Turn, Form is formidable, content is contentious. Dazzling nothingness is still nothingness. (See excerpts from Pawan Kumar interviews below).*

Shraddha Srinath was seen in Kohinoor and is doing very special cameo in Mani Ratnam upcoming film, ‪‎KaatruVeliyidai. She is a law practitioner and theatre-buff, who quit job her job to get into films. One audition was not enough. A series of rounds of auditions were held. “My God, I was nervous, and Pawan's handycam was intimidating me so much.” She got it right in the end, and this is a promising beginning.

Roger Narayan (The Test, Hola! Venky, The Man Who Knew Infinity), is a multi-national, multi-lingual in the real sense. He speaks Kannada, English, Tamil and passable Hindi, having lived in Mumbai during his childhood. After moving around with his parents for years, he has settled in Los Angeles. That might need a correction, since he has spent 7 of his last twelve months in India. Besides acting (it began in the 1980s, when he was a little boy), he enjoys biking and ....flying planes!

He was there for the Q&A after the screening, on 19 July, and looked much taller in real-life than on screen (shoo shoo?). Also came across as a loquacious person, who likes maintaining good PR. After the quirky and satirical Hola! Venky, U Turn is a progression, and he would have had a role as substantial and complete as Shradhha’s, had Pawan not made a difficult editing decision. As it stands, it is an add-on kind of part, which is only partly convincing. For a stage actor, his voice is soft and almost fuzzy. Is he toning it down too much, to suit the medium?                                                                                                   

Radhika Chetan is cast as the ghost, Maya. A software professional-turned actor, she was cast after Pawan saw her in RangiTaranga. She handles both the warm house-wife and loving mother side and the murderous ghost incarnation with equal finesse. Support from Skanda

Krishna Hebbale, Pavan, Naveen, Divya, Pramod Shetty as Sundar, Aarna Kulkarni as Aarna,

Kennedy and Chethan D’Souza, as one of the drug addicts, are on par. Chethan and his co-actor have executed the fight choreography very well. The actor playing the Sr. Inspector is a familiar face. His role and portrayal, nevertheless, appear contrived.

Trailer: https://youtu.be/Kdh5P8dtMXA

Rating: ** ½

Pawan Kumar on U Turn, and related subjects

“U-Turn was written while I was working on the Nicotine script. Nicotine is a big film and we didn’t want to compromise on the quality for that script. So getting it together took a year and meanwhile I could start U-Turn with new people and shoot it immediately.

We created a production house called PKS (Pawan Kumar Studios) and in a way it is crowd-funded because there are 65 people who are share-holders. With Lucia and crowd-funding, it stopped after one movie. But with this we should be able to fund a series of films. After Lucia, many people contacted and said they wanted to fund Kannada films. These people are from all walks of life around the world and not connected to the film industry. The creative decisions are made by me and my team but I keep them posted on everything that is happening and take their suggestions. They are aware that the growth of the independent cinema industry is quite slow.

Nicotine could still get made if U-Turn does really well and makes money. I got excited about an idea involving the KH Double Road flyover (in Bengaluru). I think it was the second flyover built in Bengaluru, and it has its own history, over the last several years, where its orientation used to keep changing. For a long time, it became the only flyover in the world to have signal on top of it!

Some of the challenges that I took personally was to not make it complex like how Lucia was. I wanted the film to be linear in narrative. The topic has to do with traffic rules and how we behave in traffic and for it to be seen by as many people and understood we didn’t want to get into this complex narrative. It is still my way of making a film but anyone will be able to watch the film and take home something from it.

U-Turn happened in July when I used to drop my daughter Lucy to school and traffic used to be high. I used to park in front of her school for more than an hour and used the time to write the script."

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

By the time you read this, the festival would have concluded, with the last screening being A Far Afternoon-A Painted Saga, the documentary on painter Krishen Khanna, by Sruti Harihara Subramaniam, on 21 July 2016.

I was there, and will write about that show too.

NYIFF-G5A Film Festival, Closing film, A Far Afternoon: One from the art

$
0
0

NYIFF-G5A Film Festival, Closing film, A Far Afternoon: One from the art

There must be something about painting genius and longevity. Not only do their works live for centuries, many of the masters themselves live relatively long lives, and are often active, even in their 90s. While watching A Far Afternoon-A Painted Saga, the 2014 documentary on painter Krishen Khanna, by Sruti Harihara Subramaniam, the closing film at the NYIFF-G5A Film Society Film Festival, one was stunned to find that Krishen Khanna, one of the few surviving artists who arrived on the Bombay painting scene in the 1940s, is active, expressive, healthy and sharp, at all of 89. He is 91 now.

In a break from the routine, the family-held Piramal Art Foundation decided to document his contributions, with the backdrop of his new, five-canvas work, which ultimately came to be titled A Far Afternoon. Running parallel and intertwined with Khanna at work is an assemblage of reminiscences, master classes in the art itself, rationale or irrationality of his own style, values and traits of various colours, and a tour of the places where his art is exhibited or embodied. As is only to be expected, there are little quips and flash-backs about his contemporaries and seniors, and one taxi-ride in Mumbai that takes him down memory lane. After all, here is where the Progressive Artists Group (PAG) was formed.

Krishen Khanna was born in Faisalabad (Multan), in 1925, and grew up in Lahore (Punjab), which are now part of Pakistan. He was sent to study in England, at the age of 13, but came back during the Second World War, as England was not a safe place to be in, during those days. Just before Partition, he had taken-up a job in a press, but the events of 1947 meant that the family had to leave Pakistan and move to Simla.

Over the decades, he has visited Pakistan many times and has quite a few friends there. Studying art at the Mayo School and working for a foreign bank, he had to make a choice. So, off went the 14 year old cushy job, and in came easels, brushes and canvases. After a long stint in Mumbai, he now lives and paints in Gurgaon, near New Delhi. Some of what you read here is not in the film, but I felt that it would be timely to highlight the context of Krishen Khanna deft strokes, and the times in which he lived and honed his talent.

Khanna was introduced to The Bombay Progressive Artists’ Group by M.F. Hussain. It was Hussain who effected the first ever sale of a Khanna painting, to Homi Bhabha, the nuclear physicist. The group was founded in 1947, by artists who challenged India’s existing conservative art establishment and sought to create an Indian form of modernism that celebrated traditional Indian painting, while also acknowledging the pioneering developments in art, in Europe and America. Shunned by the Indian art establishment, they staged their own exhibitions and events, supported by a group of refugees from war-torn Europe, in particular, the expressionist painter, Walter Langhammer.

Langhammer (1905-77), an Austrian Jew, was already in India before World War II, getting away from growing Nazi terror, and was the first art director of the Times of India. Langhammer set up an open studio in his house, where he promoted the Group. The founder members were K.H. Ara (1913-85), M. F. Husain (1915-2011), S. H. Raza (1922-2016) and F. N. Souza (1924-2002). In candid moments, Khanna talks about their individual approaches, and fondly recalls the filmy fixation of Tyeb Mehta (1925-2009), who had worked as film editor before he gained recognition as a painter. Akbar Padamsee, who appears in the film, wheel-chair bound and with a slight slur in his speech, was born in Mumbai, in 1928, and was still a student, when the PAG was formed. Their first exhibition was held in 1948, but the group disbanded soon after, with Raza moving to Paris, and Souza to London.

Two national awards had already garnered glory for Sruti’s debut feature length documentary: best arts and culture film and its musical score, by the Chennai-based duo, Aravind and Jaishankar, who employed only Carnatic ragas, with a touch of the cello. Sruti is a graduate of Visual Communication from the University of Madras. She has worked with actor-director Revathy and assisted Vishnu Vardhan. Member of a theatre group, she has also acted in TV serials. A subject like a living, renowned painter, and a man who speaks fluent English, meant half the battle won. In an obvious parallelogram, the film divides itself into five parts, like the canvas Khanna paints during the running of the film. This division and the accompanying musical demarcation could have worked better than they do.

Reasonable screen time was devoted to Khanna’s friend, artist A. Ramachandran, and art critics Ranjit Hoskote and Gayathri Sinha. All three made valuable contributions, with Gayathri getting across most easily. It was a marathon for editor Puloma Pal, with unending footage to cull from, and whatever fiction-like or staged effects that one might notice are the handiwork of her scissors and juxtaposition. Conducting most of the screen interviews was not Sruti, but the large canvas frame of Ashvin Rajagopalan (Creative Producer, on behalf of Piramal Art Foundation; a multi-faceted prodigy himself). He represented the film, in a Q&A after the show, as Sruti, originally billed to field the session, was attending a screening at Stuttgart, where it must have been a far afternoon.

At this festival, the Q&A sessions were a regular and welcome feature. They were often as long as, or even longer than, the films themselves, and at the end of the closing film, a protracted talk-the-walk came as no surprise. We had about an hour of queries and responses, at the end of this just over one hour long film. Thanks to this ‘epilogue’, we learnt that the film came about when Khanna had already finished two parts of the five, and that they had a large crew that had to be fitted into a small studio, without disturbing the man-at-work. What helped shape the film greatly was the man’s own penchant for performance, and at one stage, when asked what he would have liked to be, had he not a painter, he said, “An actor.”

A Far Afternoon ended late into the night, on a sober note, with no formal closing function.

One month long, this Tuesday/Thursday late evening venture was made possible with the help of G5A’s Presenting Partner, Sai Estate Consultants Pvt. Ltd., Chembur, Mumbai. It was occasionally well-attended but, on average, patronage was low. Media presence was practically nil. Unfortunate, to say the least. Superbly designed venue and good projection/acoustics at the Black Box compensated for the very uncomfortable plastic bucket seats on shaky wooden platforms and the propensity of the air-conditioners to steadily move towards 16° C, and stay there.

Was it the nascent film society cutting its teeth and still learning the ropes of organising a film festival (the largish team was full of beans, though. Elisha and Carol braved cold/flu symptoms, instead of taking sick leave)? Was it the high admission rates? Was it the location, which is in an industrial, redeveloped cloth mill estate? Was it the designer café that serves an exclusive menu at exclusive rates (there is no other food/beverage choice within 1 km of the location, at that hour)? Was it the predominantly ‘dry’ (read classy/arty) film selection? Was it the Tuesdays and Thursdays only, 7.30 pm, one show a day, two screenings a week schedule? Was it the rains that are a de rigueur at this time of year in India’s urbs prima. One top executive in the not-for-profit G5A Foundation for Contemporary Culture put it this way, “We could have easily filled the seats. But we would rather confine ourselves to the kind of audiences that meet our profile.”

G5A brought the award-winners and a critically favoured selection of the New York Indian Film Festival (NYIFF, an initiative of the Indo-American Arts Council--IAAC) 2016, as an India Chapter, in a first-ever tie-up of its kind, with generous support from a real estate consultant. Let’s hope they build it up from here, into a real high-rise project.

Trailer: https://youtu.be/nREli7mbAEw

*Two days after the screening of A Far Afternoon, we got the news of Raza’a death, at 94. Born in present-day Madhya Pradesh, Syed Haidar Raza had gone to Paris in 1950, to study art. 65 years later, in 2015, he was conferred with the highest French civilian distinction, the Commandeur de la Legion d’Honneur (the Legion of Honour). Two years earlier, it was the Padma Vibhushan. A tear for Raza, and more colour to the brushes of Khanna and Padamsee! Long live art. Long live the artist.

*It was a great pleasure meeting Shanta Gokhale at the screening, after at least 20 years. During her tenure at the Times of India, where she was then editing the culture page, she offered me the daunting task of writing about two of Urdu’s greatest poets, Josh Malihabadi and Firaq Gorakhpuri, in one article. Shanta also happens to be the mother of one of our most talented actresses (now director too, after making her debut film from a Shanta Gokhale story), Renuka Shahane. My brother, Riaz, helped me get all the nuances right. But as it went to print, I was under trepidation for a few days. Thankfully, my fears were misplaced. The article was commended by poet Aziz Qaisi, and brought me much appreciation from other sources too. Now that QaisiSaahab and BhaiSaahab are both no more, their memories bring a lump to my throat and tears to my eyes. Excuse me while I reach out for a tissue.

Viewing all 1037 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>