Quantcast
Channel: Siraj Syed's blog
Viewing all 1037 articles
Browse latest View live

The Program, Review: Enhanced performances

$
0
0

The Program, Review: Enhanced performances

First, there was a musician called Louis Armstrong. Then most of earth and all of moon heard about Neil Armstrong. Much later, we read and saw the exploits of cycling champion Lance Armstrong. Louis remains a musical great. Man-on-the-moon was an unimaginable theory that captured the hearts and minds of the whole world, but has now found its detractors, probably growing steadily in number, who claim the whole program (American spelling intended) was a hoax. Now, since 2012, the third Armstrong has emerged as the man who put the drugs spoke in the wheels of the much enjoyed French cycle racing Championship, the Tour de France. This doping program was no hoax.

The Program had its world première at the Toronto International Film Festival, and then went on DirecTV. It has taken its time getting to the big screen, for unknown reasons, but releases this week in India.

A biopic/docu-feature in the thriller format, The Program charts the rise of pro-cyclist Lance Armstrong through the 90s and early 2000s, battling testicular cancer, as he and his fellow American team-mates from the US Postal Service dominate the quintessentially European sport of cycling. In 1993, when Armstrong wanted to ride honestly, he discovered that the game is already ‘rigged’ by biology: those with a certain body type, and who can hold more oxygen in their blood, will always outlast everyone else, especially on high altitudes. Following his cancer treatment, Armstrong resolves to work with Dr. Michele Ferrari (of cycling notoriety, not automobile variety; do not be misled by the surname), an Italian who realises the potential of protein hormone erythropoietin (EPO) as a performance enhancing drug that cannot be easily detected, to develop a program that will give Armstrong and his team the edge to compete.

Winning the Tour de France an unprecedented seven times, Lance retires as one of the great sporting heroes of our time, and worth millions of dollars. David Walsh, sports writer for the Sunday Times, is highly surprised by Armstrong’s vast improvement after cancer, and begins probing. Armstrong’s ex-teammate and whistle-blower Floyd Landis, facing the heat, decides to bring down the man who ran the systematic doping programme that spanned the whole team, cyclists and managers alike.

Featuring American, French, British and Italian characters, the103-minute long film is a UK production, with the participation of French company, Studio Canal. Emanating from the book—The Seven Deadly Sins--by the scribe who uncovered the racket, David Walsh, the film has great credibility. How much of the book went into the film, and whether cinematic license was taken (a lot, surely!), only insiders will know. The Program has a screenplay by John Hodge (The Sweeney, A Life Less Ordinary, Trainspotting), 52 year-old Scottish writer who has been accused of overlooking the rivalry Armstrong had with the likes of Jan Ullrich, Joseba Beloki and Ivan Basso. After a quick lead-up to his marriage, there is almost nothing about his family life. In January 2013, Armstrong appeared on the Oprah Winfrey TV show and admitted that he had taken drugs during every one of his seven Tour de France victories. That show is part of the film, only sans Winfrey, only capturing the off-screen questions and Armstrong’s on-screen answers. Due credit to Hodge for tight rope-walking, one foot on the documentary, the other on the medical/ethical thriller.

British director Stephen Frears (The Queen, Philomena) helms this outing. High-voltage performances are a given with Frears, his latest re-iterating the reputation. Helped by natural polarisations, he gets to pit several manners of men and women in face-offs that result in rivetting drama: means-do-not-matter sportsmen and team-owners, cranky maniac doctor, upright and steadfast journalist, jealous team-mates, wary investors and re-insurers, weighed-by-religion sinner, etc. It works very well in drawing out the best from his team of actors. Some of the drug-injecting and related scenes could cause you to shift in your seat, so stay warned.

Ben Foster (Lance Armstrong; Messenger, The Lone Survivor, The Mechanic) has gone public with a statement that, to better understand his role, he took performance enhancing drugs while shooting the film. Speaking to the BBC, he said he felt the drugs had "definitely damaged" his body, even though he took them in a "contained, doctor-supervised manner." Foster has not named the drugs he took, except to say that they were "all legal." He added, "I had a great doctor, which helped me handle some of those consequences. But it took about half a year to get my levels right, and I would say for any athlete, you have to ask, 'Where are your values?' " Is that going too far? Let the jury decide. Acting-wise is a superb show

Chris O'Dowd (Bridesmaids, This is 40, Calvary), Irish comedian, football Liverpool fan, and 6’ 3” tall appears as David Walsh, and scales great heights. Guillaume Canet, French, son of horse-rearers, and seen in Cars, Narco, Darling, Last Night plays Michele Ferrari, the crazed, semi-maniacal doctor with scary intensity. Jesse Plemons (Floyd Landis), started acting at age three. His first job was a Coke commercial. Plemons’ pet-name is Meth Damon, result of his striking similarity to the star. Not surprisingly, Plemons played young Damon in All the Pretty Horses (2000). Not just Damon, he bears some resemblance to Philip Seymour Hoffman and Mark Wahlberg too. In a far removed claim to fame, Plemons is a great, great, great grandson of Stephen F. Austin, who founded Austin, Texas.

Landis is an orthodox Mennonite, and that denomination of the Christian Church might be quite alien to many Indians. In fact, it has only 79,150 adult members in the US. On their website, they describe themselves thus, “While we called ourselves “Anabaptists” in the 1500s, others nicknamed us the “Mennonites” after one of our early leaders, Menno Simons, a Catholic priest who aligned himself with the Anabaptists, in 1536.  The nickname stuck. And after 500 years, we’re still known as the Mennonites. We are neither catholic nor protestant.” These details are provided here to help the viewer understand the moral dilemma that the drug-propped champion Landis faces, coming from a community that forbids cycling for pleasure.

Dustin Hoffman (The Graduate, Rain Man, Kramer v/s Kramer, Tootsie), now 78 but not looking it, appears as Bob Hamman, a re-insurer who is concerned about the financial implications of the revelations in the big money championships, is as natural as ever. It’s a brief role, making few demands on his immense talent. Appreciable support comes from Lee Pace as Bill Stapleton, Denis Ménochet (French, Inglourious Basterds, in a complete and compelling change of image) as Johan Bruyneel (the manager of Armstrong’s team and Chief implementer of the doping program), Edward Hogg as Frankie Andreu, Elaine Cassidy as Betsy Andreu (husband and wife, also whistle blowers), Peter Wight as the Sunday Times Editor and Laura Donnelly as Emma O'Reilly (Armstrong’s masseuse).

I tried a search on the Tour de France website for ‘Lance Armstrong’. Guess what I got? “No results.”

Rating: ***1/2

Trailer: https://youtu.be/u7kFqp_p09o

 

David Walsh, the dogged exposer

While giving the Hugh Cudlipp annual lecture on 27 January 2014, in London, David Walsh, the Sunday Times's chief sports-writer, told the audience that his exposé was based on his inside knowledge of professional cycling. A French rider, Christophe Bassons, had written a column for the French newspaper, Le Parisien, in which he suggested that Tour de France riders were taking drugs. Armstrong pulled Bassons up during one of the Tour stages, and told him he had no right to be a professional cyclist, and what he was writing was bad for cycling.

"If Armstrong was anti-doping, Bassons would have been his friend, not his enemy," said Walsh. "Why bully him?" It confirmed his suspicion that Armstrong, who went on to win that 1999 Tour, was a drug-taker.

It wasn't until June 2012 that Walsh was finally vindicated when the United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) banned Armstrong from competitive cycling for life for doping offences and said he had been engaged in "the most sophisticated, professionalised and successful doping program that sport has ever seen." http://cyclinginvestigation.usada.org/


Race, Review: Giving racists a run for their money

$
0
0

Race, Review: Giving racists a run for their money

How long does it take for an Olympic champion to run 100 metres? Less than 10 seconds. Jesse Owens (1913-1980) was the first American in the history of Olympic track and field to win four gold medals in a single Olympiad. Back in 1936, the attention span of viewers must have been considerably longer than in this age of nano-second technology. Therefore, to make a 2h 14m film on events that occurred 80 years ago, to attract dwindling audiences to cinema-halls and to keep them engaged, must be considered an achievement on its own. Race has pace, and has its heart in the right place.

Young Jesse Owens (Stephan James) becomes a track and field sensation while attending the Ohio State University in the early 1930s. With guidance from coach Larry Snyder (Jason Sudeikis), Owens gains national recognition, breaking numerous records. It is the period when Germany is set to stage the Olympics, and the United States of America is considering boycotting the games, on account of the Aryan supremacy and anti Jewish state policy of Nazi Germany, under Chancellor Adolf Hitler. After heated debates, and a close vote, the sporting associations of USA decide not to boycott the Olympics. Overcoming racism at home and abroad, Owens seizes the opportunity to show Berlin and the world that he's the fastest man alive.

Despite Jesse Owens’s long-standing popularity, only one feature-length film has been made of his life, The Jesse Owens Story (1984), a TV docu-drama starring Dorian Harewood. Owens himself narrated Jesse Owens Returns to Berlin, in which one of the world’s greatest athletes revisited his achievements in the 100 and 200 metre, long jump (a record that stood for 25 years), and relay. This second film was made in 1964, but not broadcast until 1968, because of racism at the major American TV networks. In fact, the documentary provided many Americans with their first real-look of Owens in action. In 1936, that footage would only have screened briefly, in newsreels. And in any case, a whole generation had grown-up after that moment in history.

This version is written by British husband and wife duo Anna Waterhouse and Joe Shrapnel (Lonesome Jim, Frankie and Alice, The Roots of Heaven). It restricts itself to about three years in the life of the man whose real name was J.C. Owens, but who lived with the name ‘Jesse’ because the school-teacher who entered his name in the register heard it so, on account of J.C.’s heavy accent. Most of the narrative is predictable: under-privileged son of a large family with an unemployed father has a natural gift for running, faces discrimination at home and abroad, is mentored by a white coach against all odds, has a child from a woman but falls for a seductress, makes up with his sweetheart and brings home four gold-medals.

Who can you blame if that is how it happened? Waterhouse and Shrapnel’s first draft had some back-story, but length constraints prompted the director to confine himself to Owens’ life from about age 19 to about 22. Adolf Hitler is only a shadowy presence, while the characters of Joseph Goebbels, the Minister for Propaganda, and Leni Riefenstahl, are favoured with good scope. One passing shot of pre-glory Joe Louis losing a boxing bout, saddening his contemporary and later pal Owens, is subtlety personified. There could be serious issues with accuracy and historical perspective, but let the academicians sort those out, not us mere critics.

Shot in Montréal and Berlin, with a cast that has American, British, German, Dutch and Canadian actors, playing black, white and Jew parts, Race is directed by Stephen Hopkins (Predator 2, The Reaping, A Nightmare on Elm Street 5: The Dream Child), a South Africa-born, British educated white. Well, if the Olympics are not about diversity, what is? Talking about the realistic running by the lead actor, Stephen said, “Stephan trained for months. But the other athletes helped him in his training. We did some cinematic tricks. And we had some Canadian Olympic athletes running for him sometimes. But most of it, Stephan ran himself.” (Note how only one letter of the alphabet separates their names, which are essentially the same). One can fault the screen-writers and Hopkins for amalgamating two highly polarised characters and delineating the coach as we have seen a dozen other coaches in sport-based features, both western and Indian, in the last decade or so. It would a there is no escape from basic stereo-typing.

The two merged characters are Avery Brundage and the International Olympic Committtee President, Henri Ballet-Latour, of Belgium. In the film, Brundage takes Owens to Hitler’s box for the customary post-medal handshake, and criticises the chancellor for leaving before they reach the box. Actually, it was Henri Ballet-Latour, who demanded that Hitler shake the hands of all, or none, of the gold medalists. Earlier in the film, Brundage, who goes on a visit to check out ground realities before reporting to the US committee on the reported Jewish purge in Germany (a well shot outdoor scene), insists that all Nazi banners be removed from Berlin’s public buildings. According to authoritative sources, that too was Ballet-Latour, not Brundage.

(Brundage went to the extent of banning Owens from amateur competitions, describing him as a professional, and, after the Olympics, Owens’ first job was as a janitor (!). While Owens was a talented orator and coach, he struggled to support himself and his family for the rest of his life. He raced against horses, and even ran mock races with his friend and boxing legend Joe Louis, to make a living).

Though Montréal doubles for the American locales, it is in his recreation of the Berlin of 1936 that Hopkins scores high, especially the Olympic stadium. “I did not know how important it was to film on-location at the Olympiastadion, until I went scouting it. We shot the scene where Jesse goes to meet Hitler and is rebuffed by him in the actual room it took place.” If there is CGI involved in creating the humungous crowd of spectators, and the ambience, it is very cleverly integrated. He must also be complimented on the attention to detail in the shooting of the sporting events, and the interpretation roles of Goebbels and Riefenstahl.

Stephan James (When the Game Stands Tall, The Book of Negroes, Selma, Undone, Perfect Sisters, Home Again) is a native Canadian who writes his own rap music. His sports activities include basketball, football, soccer, kick-boxing, and track and field. Not bad casting, that. A simpleton with a sense of pride, and easily swayed by emotions, is how we see Jesse Owens through James. Being over-awed, coping with the prospect of a possible losing of an epic competition, feeling guilt-pangs about betraying the woman of his life…James brings these feelings alive.

Jeremy Irons (Reversal of Fortune, The French Lieutenant’s Woman, Moonlighting, Die Hard with a Vengeance, Stealing Beauty, The Man Who Knew Infinity), as Avery Brundage, is saddled with a complex persona: sports-lover, unscrupulous builder or a man of true grit? The film lets him be ‘all of the above’, but tilts the role towards the positive side. Shanice Banton (Canadian, singer, dancer, runner, making a debut) is cast as Ruth Solomon, the woman Owens marries. No running, dancing or singing, but this is a rocking debut. Massively understated and perfectly logical, Solomon comes across as a woman of substance.

Leni Riefenstahl is essayed by Carice van Houten (Dutch, first love is music; Black Butterflies, Black Book, Valkyrie, The Fifth Estate). Riefenstahl was a dancer, producer, director and documentary-maker, who shot the 1936 Olympics with 45 cameras. That film, in two parts, Fest der Völker and Fest der Schönheit, got the highest awards: the gold medal in Paris, in 1937, the first prize in Venice as the world's best film, in 1938, the Olympic Award, by the IOC, in 1939, and, in 1956 it had been classified as one of the world's best ten films. She died in 2003, a few days before her 101st birthday. Carice van Houten is guts and gumption in the role, holding her own against Goebbels, even when forced to stand-in as a mere interpreter, and commanding her huge crew to film every fleeting moment. Double Dutch to her art!

William Hurt (Kiss of the Spider Woman, Children of a Lesser God, Broadcast News, A History of Violence, The Accidental Tourist, Stephen Hopkins’ Lost in Space) is Jeremiah Mahoney, the opponent of Brundage and a staunch believer in the boycott of ‘Nazi Olympics’. There is a strong interior to his tempered exterior. Jason Sudeikis (We’re the Millers, Horrible Bosses, Sleeping with Other People, The Ten, Drinking Buddies, What Happens in Vegas, The Bounty Hunter) wins hearts as the coach Larry Snyder who takes on the establishment, partly by guile and partly head-on. An under-achiever who lost his career to a plane crash, he spares nothing to stand by, and travel with, Owens. In spite of the emotional overdose, it is a standard prop in all such dramas. Sudeikis is effective, without being outstanding. Barnaby Metschurat as Joseph Goebbels (Colours in the Dark, Fair Trade, Russian Dolls, The Spanish Apartment, Anatomy 2) keeps you guessing most of the time, as does the visage of Metschurat. Good propaganda for the actor who plays one of history’s most notorious propagandists.

Watch out for the German jumper competing against Owens, who does the unimaginable, thereby bringing a lump to your throat and making you want to stand-up and applaud. It also renews your faith in humaneness.

Rating: ***1/2

Trailer: https://youtu.be/Ho9KA_JF0sE

Extracted from ‘In Black and White: The Untold Story of Joe Louis and Jesse Owens’, by Donald McRae

Chicago, 4 July 1938

Jesse Owens woke early that Monday morning, on Independence Day. He knew at once that it had come back to claim him. The same sense of dread had followed him from Berlin to Cleveland and, gathering in force, found him in places as faraway as Albuquerque and Havana. It returned at night, sweeping over him as he slept the empty sleep of an exhausted man in the backroom of a black boarding house on the south side of Chicago.

He was just 24, and still the fastest man in the world, but Jesse was already worn out. It no longer mattered that he had not run a real race for nearly two years. He was sick of running. The dread caught him when least expected; he had not anticipated feeling like this when the streets hummed in celebration of his great and unshakable friend, Joe Louis. Yet, that afternoon, Jesse would face Joe in a stunt that now seemed as desolate as it was strange.

Jesse was at his happiest when he thought about everything he and Joe had achieved over the last three years. Ever since the summer of 1935, when they became the two most famous Negroes in America, the most renowned black men in the world, Jesse and Joe had been more than just friends. They were a team, two brothers from Alabama, the perfect match of a blistering runner and an ice-cold fighter.

Jesse pulled out the newspapers he'd shoved into his suitcase. No matter how hard he tried, he rarely got round to reading much. Jesse kept on collecting papers, though, sometimes tearing out clippings for the scrapbooks he and Ruth had started before they were even married. Lately, as the piles of cuttings grew and the newest scrapbooks remained untouched, he had begun to limit his quick scour to material he might use in his speeches.

Having conquered his childhood stammer, he was becoming increasingly accustomed to talking through a microphone to the crowds who turned out to watch his exhibition races. Jesse always spoke in rousing terms, mostly about the four gold medals he had won in the 1936 Berlin Olympics or the way in which Joe Louis inspired every Negro in America. Jesse liked to pepper his chat with uplifting quotes but it wasn't easy finding encouraging copy in the white newspapers.

Even though the papers were full of Joe Louis, their reports were often twisted. Jesse did not always recognise his friend in print. Joe could fight better than anyone on the planet but, no matter how hard he hit a man between the ropes, he was the softest guy you'd ever meet. The press turned him into something different.

Jesse began to underline some sentences. For Dan Parker, of the New York Daily Mirror, "Louis has finally come into his estate as a great world's champion. If anyone doubts his greatness after his masterful job last night, he's plain plumb prejudiced." Yet Henry McLemore, the Universal Press columnist, was appalled by the sight of "this ruthless, unmerciful killer". Louis had become "a jungle man, as completely primitive as any savage, out to destroy a thing he hates".

O.B. Keeler's report in the Atlanta Journal turned into a bleak lament. "Joe Louis is the heavyweight champion of the world and, so far as this correspondent can see, there is nothing to be done about it. Our fastest runners are coloured boys, and our longest jumpers and our highest jumpers."

Even if his last competitive race had been on 15 August 1936, when he completed the third leg of a meaningless relay for an American team in London, Jesse had not forgotten what it felt like to be a champion. He was only 22 when American officials banned him, a day after that London race. Jesse was branded a "professional" - which, on the track, was a word even more damning than "nigger". Sometimes he thought his heart would crack if he considered the full and bitter truth. He would never run or jump in competition again . . .

The two men sat on a hard wooden bench in the front row of American Giants Park. Jesse had pulled on a crimson vest and white shorts. Joe, despite having removed his green jacket beneath the hot sun, still wore his riding kit. The fighter ate his second ice-cream of the afternoon. Joe, like Jesse, was 24 years old. He seemed oblivious to the fact that almost 7,000 pairs of eyes focused on him.

"Feelin' confident, champ?" Jesse joked as the heavyweight brought the mound of melting strawberry to his mouth.

Joe looked up in surprise, before suddenly remembering that they were only 10 minutes away from the race. "Well," he drawled, "one more o' these babies ain't gonna make no difference . . ."

Pink ice-cream trickled down the sides of the cone. Joe sucked in a blob from the top before he cleaned up the cone with his tongue. Joe's friend, Mack Jones, burst out laughing. "My money's still on you, Joe," Mack yelled as he clapped the champion on the back.

The race was scheduled for three o'clock. Joe had spent the first hour at the ballpark signing his name and acknowledging every flush-faced fan with deadpan courtesy. He didn't mind. An adoring crowd at a Negro League double-header was nothing compared to the crush that usually engulfed him as people rushed to him as if he was some kind of saviour. At least these folk allowed him to eat a couple of ice-creams and talk to his buddy.

"How the Alabama boys do yesterday?" Joe asked as they watched the last Birmingham Baron batter walk slowly back to the dug-out at the end of a 12-2 hammering by the local American Giants. He knew Jesse had sprinted through yet another exhibition in the midst of a Sunday afternoon doubleheader between the two teams.

"They lost both," Jesse said.

Joe had been born to sharecroppers at the foot of the Buckalew Mountains in Alabama. Jesse came from Oakville, a tiny sharecropping community 10 miles from the nearest town of Decatur in northern Alabama. "We better put on a better show than Birmingham," Jesse said.

"Yeah," Joe grunted.

"You gonna run in that?" Mack asked, gesturing towards Joe's dressage outfit.

"Sure," Joe said. "A vest and shorts ain't gonna make me any faster."

They pressed their way through the crowd until they reached the edge of the field. The spectators clapped rhythmically as a tinny microphone introduced "the two most famous Negroes in America". Jesse and Joe looked at each other and almost smiled. It was race time.

"You ready, Joe?" Jesse asked as they walked towards the makeshift starting line.

Joe nodded, and then asked his own question: "You still want to do it this way?"

"It's what they want," Jesse said.

"OK," Joe shrugged. "Let's give 'em what they want."

Deepening silence

The Olympic champion was 5ft 10in tall and weighed a lean 165lb. His legs were powerful, bursting with all the muscled spring and strength which enabled him to jump further and run faster than any man alive. Joe, meanwhile, had the body to match his imposing title. The heavyweight champion of the world was 6ft 1in and weighed 205lb. His neck, shoulders and back looked massive, his chest and stomach a brown wall of muscle beneath his white shirt. He had no need to run. He could just stand and punch. Joe liked moving forward steadily, with the sticky resin of the ring floor making him believe it was impossible he would ever fall.

Jesse skipped down the oval turf with a typically light step. It no longer mattered if he raced against a dog or the heavyweight champion of the world. Jesse was always ready for the track.

They lined up alongside each other. In the deepening silence Jesse arched his back and readied himself for an explosive start. A half-crouching Joe looked like a weary boxer waiting for the last-round bell.

At the sound of the starter's gun Jesse leapt forward with a jerk. After a few long strides he tripped over his tangled feet. It was a clumsy fall, a hammy piece of acting even to the screamers high up in the cheap seats. Jesse Owens was down, as helpless as any man struck low by the Brown Bomber.

Joe ran his hardest, his legs thundering down the channel in a way they never did on one of his dawn runs. He was halfway to the tape by the time Jesse picked himself up. The gap was too wide. Jesse could not catch the champ. He crossed the line close behind Joe. The crowd rocked with delight. The World's Fastest Man had stuck to his new script.

Jesse stretched out his hand as Joe turned towards him. The fighter pulled him in close, as if consoling an opponent in defeat. They held each other for a moment, their heads bowed. Jesse spoke softly. "You ran real well, champ."

"Yeah," Joe said, his face empty and still.

They broke apart. Joe kept his head down as they walked back towards the stomping crowd. Jesse lifted his right hand and, beneath a clear blue sky, smiled his most brilliant smile. They had made it. They had both risen and fallen and risen again. They were icons who had come a long and dizzying way from the summer of '35 when, as a couple of 21-year-old Negro kids, they had set out together on the greatest journey in sporting history.

Eye in the Sky, Review: Mor(t)al blows

$
0
0

Eye in the Sky, Review: Mor(t)al blows

Collateral damage has been an emotion charged topic for debates world-wide, ever since the USA began bombing foreign locations, where, it believed, wanted persons were living, hiding or gathering. Along with its allies, notably the UK, the USA has been carrying out pre-emptive air-strikes for decades. Eye in the Sky (the title does not do full justice to its theme and thrust) is about the compunction experienced by a group of high-placed government officials and military personnel who hesitate before they sanction a drone strike; others, who strongly feel that this procrastination is unwarranted; and still others, who need to hear strong arguments from both camps, before deciding aye or nay. The film is not a new subject, it is not an eye-opener, nor is the ‘take’ new. Occasionally masquerading as a spy satire, Eye in the Sky is definitely compelling viewing, an emotional volcano, and a political see-saw.

A family of Somali refugees lives next door to Al-Shabab terrorists in a Nairobi slum. Their only child, a nine year-old daughter, Alia (Aisha Takow) of a bicycle repairman Musa Mo'Allim (Armaan Haggio) sells her mother Fatima (Faisa Hassan)’s home-baked bread at a table right outside a safe-house. American, British, and Kenyan intelligence teams have tracked two British nationals, one black US national whose British wife, Susan Helen Danford (Lex King), now known as Ayesha Al Hady, helped recruit two suicide bombers. The two are being initiated inside that very house. Tracking them on ground is agent Jama Farah (Barkhad Abdi), using the latest, most sophisticated gadgets, like a remote controlled bird camera and a tiny, beetle-like device, called Ringo.

Colonel Katherine Powell (Helen Mirren), a UK-based military officer, has been following Danford, a converted, radicalised woman, for six years. Powell discovers the suicide bombing plan and the mission escalates from "capture" to "kill." The presence of UK and US citizens, albeit rogue elements, and the location being a friendly country, are debated, and overridden. But as American pilot Steve Watts (Aaron Paul) and his colleague Carrie Gershon (Phoebe Fox) are about to engage the ‘eye in the sky’ to shoot a Hellfire missile, Alia enters the ‘kill zone’, triggering an international re-assessment of the situation, at the highest levels of the US and British governments: British Lieutenant General (Alan Rickman), British Foreign Secretary (Iain Glen), British Attorney General (Richard McCabe), Angela Northam (Monica Dolan) and another, similar contingent across the Atlantic. The moral, political, and personal implications of the ‘to bomb or not to bomb’ situation are dissected and analysed, with stands softening and hardening, until the inevitable.

Guy Hibbert (Five Minutes of Heaven, Omagh, Prime Suspect) has written the screenplay, and in the absence of any other writing credit, we assume that it is an original work. A reference to American Sniper is too apparent to ignore, if you recall the woman and boy whom Bradley Cooper hesitates to shoot in the Jason Hall written and Clint Eastwood directed moral tale. Numerous other news items (see two culled, below) about various USA/NATO/Allied forces/friendly country operations must have surely turned-up in Hibbert’s searches, who has churned them all into an engaging blend. He keeps melodrama to a minimum, making it even more potent, but the ping-pong game (used as a telling metaphor in the film) does tend to get predictable, even funny, when each player wants to ‘refer-up’, to his/her superiors. How and when that reference happens is, to his credit, imaginatively, even humorously woven-in. (I confess that I liked the familiar sight of Singapore’s Marina Bay Sands hotel, but I must also confess that an arms dealers’ convention is not a serene sight, wherever it is held). A double whammy climax, in the mould of a Charlie Chaplin tragic-comic punch, adds to the narrative.

Director Gavin Hood (Tsotsi, Rendition X-Men Origins: Wolverine, Ender's Game) was born in South Africa, drafted at 17 and sent to Angola to fight. He lost a close friend there and returned a very different person. A military reservist, he decided not to participate in the proxy wars any more, and moved to the United States in 1989, to study film-making. Eye in the Sky is shot in his native country, where he was not allowed the use of real drones, so VFX have been used instead. Eye in the Sky (drone bomber) apart, three other devices are very much James Bondish, ‘Q’ey creations: the bird, the cigarette case and the beetle.

For obvious reasons, his delving into the black characters, even those that are on the UK-USA side, is a shade deeper than the portrayal of the white war-room brains, and the concerned higher-ups elsewhere. That is not to say that almost all the white actors don’t give us immersed cameos. It is unclear why the spy camera coverage of the goings on inside the ‘safe-house’ is incorporated in slow, boringly repetitive, documentary style, notwithstanding the ritual, and the one explosive discovery as it moves into an adjoining room. Hood chooses not to translate or sub-title the dialogue in the African languages, indirectly dragging you even deeper into what is being conveyed. What you decode visually is much less than what was said, but just enough to apprise you of the operative part of the conversations.

They could not but dedicate the film to Rickman, who died of pancreatic cancer in January 2016. British actor Alan Rickman (Harry Potter x 7, Die Hard, Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves), is seen in his last acting role. He will be remembered as much for his forceful persona in the war-room, as he will be for his scenes involving a doll. Helen Mirren (Excalibur, The Cook, the Thief, His Wife & Her Lover, The Queen) as a woman who has hardened her exterior, and most of her interior, to a professional level, is crisp and quietly menacing.

Mirren worked with Rickman only once earlier, as Cleopatra to his Antony, in the stage production of Shakespeare’s play, in 1998, and had this to say about the memory, “It was difficult because he stepped in at the last minute when the actor who was originally playing the role dropped out. . . . He came in and very courageously jumped in.” In Eye in the Sky, the two actors did not end up sharing any scenes at all, because they were at different locales, and were communicating via video links—a point, Mirren said, “I’m very, very upset about.”

Barkhad Abdi (Somali-American former limo cab driver/DJ, Oscar nominee for Captain Phillips-2013) is strikingly gifted. This is a completely convincing and natural performance. Aaron Paul (Triple 9, Exodus: Gods and Kings, Need for Speed)’s conscience is for all to empathise with, with helpless sympathy coming from debutante Phoebe Fox (theatre, TV, first major role). Babou Ceesay as Sergeant Mushtaq Saddiq, who is diplomatically blackmailed into fudging Collateral Damage Estimates (CDE), internalises and ‘cottonises’ the proverbial sledge-hammer moral blow he receives, to perfection. The second, longish scene featuring him and Mirren haunts you for long. Iain Glen (Jack Taylor, Breathless, The Iron Lady) makes a suitable Foreign Secretary, just as Richard McCabe and Monica Dolan slip into their parts. Ed Suter as Benson’s ADC adds the touch of a very British smile. Lex King has no part, to speak of. Faisa Hassan, Arman Haggio and Aisha Takow could not have been better cast. Try and hold back your tears as they swirl and well up to the looping hula hoop of Aisha Takow.

Rating: ***1/2

Trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TowybOAURIw

Al-Shabab denies top leaders killed in US air strikes (Source: Al Jazeera)

Senior commander makes public appearance to deny claims he and another leader were killed in raids in southern Somalia.

Hamza Mohamed | 10 Mar 2016 17:57 GMT | Somalia, Al-Shabab, Africa, War & Conflict

Mogadishu, Somalia - A senior al-Shabab commander has made a public appearance to deny claims that he and another group leader were killed in US air strikes last week at a training camp in southern Somalia.

Washington said on Monday it had carried out several strikes in Somalia's Hiiraan region, in which it claimed more than 150 of the al-Qaeda-linked group's fighters had been killed.

Somali officials said later on Monday that five al-Shabab commanders had been killed in Saturday's attack, including Mohamed Mire, the group's Hiiraan governor, and Yusuf Ali Ugas, al-Shabab's former Hiiraan chief.

But Mire appeared on Thursday in the village of Buqa Qabe - in the same province the air strikes took place - to dismiss the claims.

"It is all lies. They said I was among those killed. But I'm here and doing well as you can see," he told a crowd that had gathered to see the public execution of a man the group accused of being a Somali government soldier.

Al-Shabab, which is fighting Somalia's internationally recognised government, has recently attacked and overrun military bases belonging to the African Union peacekeeping mission, AMISOM.

The US air strikes occurred at 14:00 GMT on Saturday at a camp about 130km from Belidogle airport in the Lower Shabelle region - a major base for AMISOM troops. American soldiers are also present at the Belidogle base.

The al-Shabab fighters were training for a large-scale attack and posed an imminent threat to US and African Union forces in Somalia, according to the Pentagon.

"It is all propaganda. America is losing this war and that is why they now have to resort to guerrilla tactic," Mire added, in reference to a Wednesday morning raid on the town of Awdhegle - 50km south of the capital Mogadishu - by joint US and Somali special forces.

Somali officials said more than a dozen al-Shabab fighters were killed in the raid which involved two helicopters. Al-Shabab said only one of its fighters was killed.

There was no way of independently verifying both claims.

41 men targeted but 1,147 people killed: US drone strikes – the facts on the ground

New analysis of data conducted by human rights group Reprieve shared with the Guardian, raises questions about accuracy of intelligence guiding ‘precise’ strikes

‘Drone strikes have been sold to the American public on the claim that they’re ‘precise.’ But they are only as precise as the intelligence that feeds them.’

Spencer Ackerman in New York Monday 24 November 2014 16.55 GMT Last modified on Monday 24 November 2014 17.23 GMT

The drones came for Ayman Zawahiri on 13 January 2006, hovering over a village in Pakistan called Damadola. Ten months later, they came again for the man who would become al-Qaida’s leader, this time in Bajaur.

Eight years later, Zawahiri is still alive. Seventy-six children and 29 adults, according to reports after the two strikes, are not.

However many Americans know who Zawahiri is, far fewer are familiar with Qari Hussain. Hussain was a deputy commander of the Pakistani Taliban, a militant group aligned with al-Qaida that trained the would-be Times Square bomber, Faisal Shahzad, before his unsuccessful 2010 attack. The drones first came for Hussain years before, on 29 January 2008. Then they came on 23 June 2009, 15 January 2010, 2 October 2010 and 7 October 2010.

Finally, on 15 October 2010, Hellfire missiles fired from a Predator or Reaper drone killed Hussain, the Pakistani Taliban later confirmed. For the death of a man whom practically no American can name, the US killed 128 people, 13 of them children, none of whom it meant to harm.

A new analysis of the data available to the public about drone strikes, conducted by the human-rights group Reprieve, indicates that even when operators target specific individuals – the most focused effort of what Barack Obama calls “targeted killing” – they kill vastly more people than their targets, often needing to strike multiple times. Attempts to kill 41 men resulted in the deaths of an estimated 1,147 people, as of 24 November.

Reprieve, sifting through reports compiled by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, examined cases in which specific people were targeted by drones multiple times. Their data, shared with the Guardian, raises questions about the accuracy of US intelligence guiding strikes that US officials describe using words like “clinical” and “precise.”

The analysis is a partial estimate of the damage wrought by Obama’s favored weapon of war, a tool he and his administration describe as far more precise than more familiar instruments of land or air power.

“Drone strikes have been sold to the American public on the claim that they’re ‘precise’. But they are only as precise as the intelligence that feeds them. There is nothing precise about intelligence that results in the deaths of 28 unknown people, including women and children, for every ‘bad guy’ the US goes after,” said Reprieve’s Jennifer Gibson, who spearheaded the group’s study.

Some 24 men specifically targeted in Pakistan resulted in the death of 874 people. All were reported in the press as “killed” on multiple occasions, meaning that numerous strikes were aimed at each of them. The vast majority of those strikes were unsuccessful. An estimated 142 children were killed in the course of pursuing those 24 men, only six of whom died in the course of drone strikes that killed their intended targets.

In Yemen, 17 named men were targeted multiple times. Strikes on them killed 273 people, at least seven of them children. At least four of the targets are still alive.

Available data for the 41 men targeted for drone strikes across both countries indicate that each of them was reported killed multiple times. Seven of them are believed to still be alive. The status of another, Haji Omar, is unknown. Abu Ubaidah al-Masri, whom drones targeted three times, later died from natural causes, believed to be hepatitis.

The data cohort is only a fraction of those killed by US drones overall. Reprieve did not focus on named targets struck only once. Neither Reprieve nor the Guardian examined the subset of drone strikes that do not target specific people: the so-called “signature strikes” that attack people based on a pattern of behavior considered suspicious, rather than intelligence tying their targets to terrorist activity. An analytically conservative Council on Foreign Relations tally assesses that 500 drone strikes outside of Iraq and Afghanistan have killed 3,674 people.

As well, the data is agnostic on the validity of the named targets struck on multiple occasions being marked for death in the first place.

Like all weapons, drones will inevitably miss their targets given enough chances. But the secrecy surrounding them obscures how often misses occur and the reasons for them. Even for the 33 named targets whom the drones eventually killed – successes, by the logic of the drone strikes – another 947 people died in the process.

There are myriad problems with analyzing data from US drone strikes. Those strikes occur under a blanket of official secrecy, which means analysts must rely on local media reporting about their aftermath, with all the attendant problems besetting journalism in dangerous or denied places. Anonymous leaks to media organizations, typically citing an unnamed American, Yemeni or Pakistani official, are the only acknowledgements that the strikes actually occur, or target a particular individual.

Without the CIA and the Joint Special Operations Command declassifying more information on the strikes, unofficial and imprecise information is all that is available, complicating efforts to independently verify or refute administration assurances about the impact of the drones.

What little US officials say about the strikes typically boils down to assurances that they apply “targeted, surgical pressure to the groups that threaten us,” as John Brennan, now the CIA director, said in a 2011 speech.

“The only people that we fire a drone at [sic] are confirmed terrorist targets at the highest level after a great deal of vetting that takes a long period of time. We don’t just fire a drone at somebody and think they’re a terrorist,” the secretary of state, John Kerry, said at a BBC forum in 2013.

A Reprieve team investigating on the ground in Pakistan turned up what it believes to be a confirmed case of mistaken identity. Someone with the same name as a terror suspect on the Obama administration’s “kill list” was killed on the third attempt by US drones. His brother was captured, interrogated and encouraged to “tell the Americans what they want to hear”: that they had in fact killed the right person. Reprieve has withheld identifying details of the family in question, making the story impossible to independently verify.

“President Obama needs to be straight with the American people about the human cost of this programme. If even his government doesn’t know who is filling the body bags every time a strike goes wrong, his claims that this is a precise programme look like nonsense, and the risk that it is in fact making us less safe looks all too real,” Gibson said.

(Both the above news items are reproduced with the sole purpose of giving readers of this film review an opportunity to understand the terms, and the contexts seen and heard during their viewing experience. The exercise is purely academic, and all credit is given, wherever due).

Batman v Superman - Dawn of Justice, Review: Bruced ego and the krypTonite show

$
0
0

Is there no justice in this world? Lex Luthor argues that since God takes sides, he cannot be a just hero, and likewise Superman, who is revered as God’s agent on earth. What if Superman went rogue, he postulates? So, he asks the White House to allow him to import kryptonite (rock from Kal El’s native planet, Krypton, that robs him of his superpowers) from an ancient ship wreckage in the Indian Ocean, just in case....

Senators are not impressed, possibly because instead of behaving like a regular billionaire inheritor, he mimics Indian superstar ShahRukh Khan, and talks with a pronounced lisp. But hold on! ShahRukh is a superstar, and billions of cinegoers swoon over him, so Luthor manages to sell his idea to a couple of American government insiders, a paraplegic who lost his legs when he was crushed under the crumbling Wayne Industries skyscraper, when Superman battled Zod in the skies. Also on board are a few hundred henchmen, impressed (paid?) enough to join the trans-oceanic heist, with a ship, containers, dozens of vehicles and tons of fire-power. Now for, the formal synopsis.

Following his titanic struggle against General Zod, and the massive collateral damage, Metropolis has been razed to the ground and Superman is the most controversial figure in his part of the world. While for many he is still an emblem of hope, a growing number of people consider him a threat to humanity, seeking justice for the chaos he has brought to Earth. As far as Gotham’s Bruce Wayne is concerned, Superman is clearly a danger to society. He fears for the future of the world, with such a reckless power left unbridled, and, while the world wrestles with what kind of a hero it really needs, he sets out with all his mind-boggling technology and amazing physical strengths, to right Superman's wrongs. Besides remote-controlling the Batman and Superman face-off, Lex Luthor, CEO of LexCorp, creates a new threat, Doomsday, a power greater than both of them.

In 2013, Warner Bros. announced that director Zack Snyder and screen-writer David S. Goyer would return for a Man of Steel sequel. The film's official title ‘Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice’ was revealed in May 2014. Snyder stated that having the "v" in the title instead of "vs." was a way "to keep it from being a straight 'versus' movie, even in the most subtle way."  Goyer, co-writer, had “originally intended on becoming a homicide detective and was set to get a degree in police administration, when I happened to hear Lawrence Kasdan speak at the University of Michigan. Kasdan’s stories inspired m, and I decided to ditch police work in favour of Hollywood.” Good decision, what with credits like Batman Begins, Dark Knight, The Dark Knight Rises and Man of Steel (with Christopher Nolan).

Matt Damon, a good friend of Affleck, has said that, “Once he was able to get Chris Terrio to write (read re-write Batman v. Superman), Affleck coming on board as Batman was only to be expected.” Remember, Terrio wrote the Oscar winning script of Argo, which starred, and was directed by, Affleck. Harvard and USC educated Terrio was drawn into the medium by famed director James Ivory and offered a film to direct by Ivory’s partner, Indian-origin Ismail Merchant, of the Merchant-Ivory Productions fame. That film was written by Amy Fox and called Heights. Next we heard was Argo. Now which of this duo is a die-hard Hindi masala-film fan? Evidence would suggest Terrio, but neither James Ivory nor Ismail merchant made any film even remotely akin to the Hindi masala film, though many of their films had Indian writers and actors, and were shot in India. So, is it Goyer?

Two ‘heart-of-gold’ strongmen (remember the likes of Dara Singh, Sheikh Mukhtar, Randhawa, Joginder, Ajeet and Dharmendra, in their heyday?) have a silly confrontation, a villain manipulates and precipitates the combat, kidnaps the girl-friend and mother of one of them (the other one, luckily for him, does not have anybody up for kidnapping any girl-friend and his mother is dead, unless, of course, you count his brainiac partner) to help reach critical mass, and the biggest twist comes when it is revealed that the first names of Mrs. Kent (Clark’s adoptive mother) and Mrs. Wayne (Bruce’s real mother) happen to be Martha.

Astute reporters of the Daily Planet (Clark Kent, Superman’s alter ego, known to his girl-friend, and Lois Lane), technocrat, gizmo, gadget and information technology freak Bruce Wayne, a.k.a. Batman), an ancient goddess on a mission (Wonder Woman) and a psychopathic wiz-kid (Lex Luthor), all seem to be playing a ‘dumb and dumber’ game, even when mouthing profundities. Only in the case of Luthor can we let this pass, maybe in view of his last scene in the film.

There is just that dash of humour in the form of Alfred Pennyworth, Wayne’s man Friday. But that is not what tilts the narrative in Batman’s favour. What chance does an ancient, alien, flying man of steel, with piercing vision, but an Achilles’ heel of a debilitating weakness, against kryptonite, stand against the “you name it, I have it, or will get it” 21st century rippling muscleman American? Moreover, Superman has two other vulnerabilities, both women and both alive, while Wayne has none.

Superman made his DC (Detective Comics, defunct since 1973) debut in 1938 and Batman arrives a year later. On screen, the franchises really kicked off in 1978 (late Christopher Reeve as Superman) and 1989 (Michael Keaton donning the mask). Are they now trying to bump off older brother Supie? Would be foolish, if they did! If he could grab a few million eyeballs in the nascent animation/VFX/CGI era of eons ago, he can be continually milked to growing fortunes in the present millennium too, as events of 2013 (Man of Steel) have proven. Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster, creators of Superman, did their home-work well. Bob Kane and Bill Finger (Batman) have put their fingers right on the pulse of the masses, with even present-day middle-aged fans desperate to acquire merchandise and click selfies with the cut-outs and puffed vinyl figures. The Warner Group, of which DC is part for a long time now, can safely keep foraying into these brands for quite some time yet.

Zack Snyder (Sucker Punch, Man of Steel, 300: Rise of an Empire) turned 50 three weeks ago. This film is not the ideal gift he would want to give himself. After a mish-mash first half, we do find some redeeming features in the latter portion. Two epic battles are thunderously well crafted, albeit repetitive, in opponents hurling each other again, and again and again. Senator Finch comes across as a woman of convictions, but why does she walk into the situations she does? Wayne running around helplessly and merely lifting one stone to pull out a skyscraper crash victim is hardly superhero stuff. Dreams and hallucinations interfere with the story and go off at a tangent. Designed by Dennis McCarthy and Patrick Tatopoulos, the Batmobile you see in this film is different from earlier car models: 20 feet long and 12 feet wide in the back. Some of the chase footage is clearly edge-of-the-seat. Repeated shots of an adversary in the truck, holding a missile launcher as if it was a fishing rod, give a comic effect, rather than a sense of fear.

Ben Affleck had said after doing Daredevil (2003) that he had "inoculated myself from ever playing another superhero.” Never say never again. His big, square jaw, gravelly, disjointed mumble and brooding blank looks make you feel that he might have had a point about not wanting to play vigilante any more. British actor Henry William Dalgliesh Cavill, (Immortals, Man of Steel, The Man from U.N.C.L.E.) is the more vulnerable of the two, and also the more naïve character. With beautiful Amy Adams rooting for him, and his alien/earthling existential dilemma, Cavill earns sympathy. Amy Adams as Lois Lane is warm and expressive as ever, only her role is not developed. One track—her dogged pursuit of a political plot—is left hanging. As it stands, the 153-minute long film needs about 30 more minutes of explanatory narrative to be coherent. It could also do with 30 minutes of trimming, as a swap. Much too late in the day, for the dawn of justice.

Jesse Eisenberg 30, the boyish former comic seen in Zombieland, Solitary Man and The Social Network, is Lex Luthor. Villains who are both psychotic and hilarious need to be extremely well-written, and even better personified. Luthor lacks on both counts. Holly Hunter (The Piano, Thirteen, Nine Lives) as Senator Finch convinces, till she if left to fend for herself in what can best be described as the ‘green tea’ scene. Diane Lane as Martha Kent, Clark’s adoptive mother, is duly sensitive while Laurence Fishburne as Perry White, the editor-in-chief of the Daily Planet, goes about the routine. Jeremy Irons, as Alfred Pennyworth, is worth much more than what he has delivered. With every succeeding film, he is getting increasingly type-cast. One great combat pose is enough to give a nod to that Gal called Gadot’s brief appearance as the immortal Wonder Woman. Kevin Costner’s cameo as Jonathan Kent is fluid and pleasant.

Back in the late 50s, as a young boy, I sat in the audience, perplexed, as producer-director-actorShantaram addressed the audience from the screen, talking about how he had almost lost his eyes while fighting a bull during the shooting of his film, Do Aankhen Barah Haath. Almost sixty years later, I saw Zack Snyder on screen at Cinépolis, Andheri, Mumbai, beseeching audiences not to reveal plot twists and spoilers. Well, the greatest twist/spoiler is that Snyder’s over-written film is not a straight Batman vs. Superman clash. Now, who said that?

Rating: **1/2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kW9ZqFxRaQY

Rocky Handsome, Review: Rocky terrain, bumpy ride

$
0
0

Rocky Handsome, Review: Rocky terrain, bumpy ride

Okay, so John Abraham is a handsome hunk with codename. Rocky...Handsome...does that justify the title? Read on. John is great at action and decides to cash in on his forté yet again in another remake, with remake veteran director Nishikant Kamat. Remember John’s earlier home production called Force, remake of a Tamil film? This time, the team looks to the Far East, and settles for the gut-wrenching, bullet spraying, bone-crushing local hit, The Man from Nowhere (South Korea, 2010). A title like Rocky Handsome reminds you of Vicky Donor, Miss Lovely and/or Bobby Jasoos, and is a complete mismatch, likely to attract the wrong audiences and keep John’s real fans away.

A covert military operations man, Kabir Ahlawat is grievously wounded, and his pregnant wife killed, by enemy elements. He recovers, but gives up his profession, becoming an introverted pawn-broker instead. Kabir’s neighbours include a drug-addict, jobless, single woman, called Anna, and her eight year-old illegitimate daughter, Naomi. Naomi is very fond of Kabir and vice versa. She steals and sells off the goods to Kabir, to help support herself and her mother. Naomi calls Kabir “Handsome” and unhesitatingly reveals to him that her own nick-name is Dustbin, because “they say that my mother kicked a dustbin and I was born as a result.” Anna and her boy-friend stumble upon a caché of drugs and tainted money, and decide to decamp, but are found out. Anna is killed and Naomi taken captive. Kabir tries to negotiate a deal with the gangsters, who turn out to be far more dangerous and ruthless than he could have imagined.

It is ‘a loose adaptation’ of the Korean film, insisted the film’s publicity all along. They did not say it was a bad adaptation. Neither does the locale (South Korea) replicate well as Goa, nor do many of the characters metamorphose into the Indian milieu. ‘Adapted screenplay’ writer Ritesh Shah (Force, B.A. Pass, Airlift) is not in his element here. Overdrive is the order of the day. Too many gangsters, too many flash-backs, too many policemen, too may clubbers, too many item girl dancers, too many scantily clad women, too many cars, too many child actors, too many fights, too many precocious dialogue bits, too many unintentionally funny situations...Too many.

With at least four accepted remakes (Dombivali Fast in Marathi, Force and Drishyam before this), Nishikant Kamat has earned the moniker of remake specialist. Dombivali was a delight while Drishyam, also set in Goa, was a disappointment. No comment on Force, which I have missed. Kamat does good service to self-confessed underdog John’s cause and he responds with an acceptable blend of action and understated emotion (as favourably compared with the blank, wooden visage he is usually identified with). His role is well juxtaposed with a chirpy, eloquent girl.

Action is mind-boggling, though often prolonged just to showcase John’s fighting skills. Humour is hard to come by, and when it does, it is of the flat, uni-dimensional variety. Accents bear no similarity to the ethnicity of the characters, the sprinkling of Goan Konkani dialect notwithstanding. Taking the audience for granted, Kamat offers no details of the attack on the lead couple, nor does he explain how did the variegated crime mafia, comprising drugs, prostitution, child trafficking, organ trade and you name it, was able to spread its tentacles so far and wide, without conniving policemen and how was it suddenly discovered. Kamat also brings in local Goan allusions and realities, like the tourist trade, a politically connected criminal brother duo and the canteen that offers only vegetarian food to grumbling police officers pining for meat, which really add nothing to the narrative.

John Abraham (Dhoom, Force, Housefull 2, Madras Café) uses the same ‘lucky’ name he had in Jism and Dhoom. Kabir means big/great, and was the name of the famed Indian spiritual poet who preached universal brotherhood. His code-name is obviously a tribute to his idol, Sylvester Stallone, known for the iconic Rocky series of films about a legendary boxer.His looks are modelled after Won Bin, the actor who starred in The Man from Nowhere. He told the press much before the release of this film, “My body turned black and blue during training, but it paid off.” John added that the action scenes were real, without usage of any VFX. To make them look totally convincing, he learnt Aikido, Hapkido and Krav Maga. If anything, John is sincere and gives the role 100%. Even his romantic scenes with Shruti Haasan are not awkward. Sadly for John, even as the actor in him has matured noticeably, producer Abraham might not reap the rewards.

Shruti Haasan (Luck, Gabbar is back, Welcome Back) as Rukshida (exotic name), Kabir’s lady love, has a sexy, husky-voiced romp in Seychelles with her beau, replete with a passionate song, until death does them apart. Nishikant Kamat himself essays Kevin Fereira, one of the two Mafioso brothers, in an unusual piece of casting. "I have this habit of tonsuring my head after every film of mine. And when Rocky Handsome was being made, Lai Bhaari (his Marathi hit) had just released. It so happened that the person who was supposed to play the villain in Rocky Handsome developed cold feet at the eleventh hour and backed out. One of my assistants saw me and remarked ‘Sir, aapka look perfect hai’ (Sir, your look is perfect for this role), and given the fact that I look like a Goan in real life, I got away with the role." Well, he does exude confidence, but all the bad guys in the film, including Kamat excel at hamming, and none get away, literally or figuratively. They include Teddy Maurya as Luke Ferreira, Gwalior-born Sharad Kelkar (Goliyon Ki Raasleela Ram-Leela, Lai Bhaari, Hero) and the actor who plays Maanto.

Nathalia Kaur as Anna has a small role that has come under the censors’ scissors, as must have the special ‘appearance’ of danseuse Nora Fatehi. Kazu Patrick Tang (nationality unspecified but decidedly oriental) as Atilla (Hun/Pun?) has an intense persona and puts up a compelling fight. Suhasini Mulay gets a brief part as the Madam of the child den. I cannot remember Uday Chandra’s unconventional looks being used in the manner they have been exploited here, albeit fleetingly, as the doctor who gouges eyes for the gang to sell. As a senior cop, ShivKumar Subramaniam comes across as a caricature.

With the face of a five year-old and the dialogue delivery of a nine year-old, seven year-old Baby Diya Chalwad as Naomi is pleasing, with near fluency in Hindi. That her part fails to fully convince is among the failures of the film. It is rocky terrain and a bumpy ride that awaits you, yet one that John Abraham fans may take in their stride, and even buy the hard to imagine concept of him playing a reclusive pawn-broker.

On last count, Rocky Handsome has three other films included in the ticket price of one: The Man from Nowhere, Léon the Professional and With You, Without You. See below to find common elements.

Rating: **

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFKluii3rmI

The Man from Nowhere, South Korea, 2010

Tae-shik (Woh Bin) is an ex-special agent whose tragic past has made him distance himself from the world. He now lives in solitude and runs a small pawnshop. The only people he now sees are the few pawnshop customers and So-mi (Kim Sae-Ron), the young girl who lives next door. So-mi has also been neglected by the world and as she and Tae-shik begin to spend more time together, the two gradually open themselves to one another and become friends. Then one day, So-mi suddenly disappears. So-mi s mother becomes involved in a major crime causing both her and So-mi to get kidnapped. Tae-shik is drawn back out into the world in a frantic search for So-mi’s whereabouts. In order to save So-mi, his one and only friend in this world, Tae-shik makes a certain arrangement with the crime mob. While So-mi is still nowhere to be found, the police begin to chase Tae-shik. With the police and the underground mob close on his tail, Tae-shik continues his frantic search for So-mi, and his hidden past slowly becomes revealed...

With You, Without You, SriLanka, 2012

Sarathsiri, a forty-five year old man, lives in a two storied building in a remote town surrounded by tea plantations. The ground floor is converted into a pawn shop and he lives on the upper floor. He is an ex Sri Lankan Army soldier. A loner, he lives alone, while frequently watching Western wrestling matches on television as his only pastime. Selvi, a young girl aged twenty-four, visits Sarathsiri's pawn shop to pawn items, some which are not worth anything, in the hope of getting some much-needed money for survival.

Léon the Professional, France, 1994

Léon (Jean Reno) is a professional hit-man, with ninja-like skills, who eliminates rivals for a mob boss (Danny Aiello). After a corrupt cop (Gary Oldman) eliminates the family residing next door, due to a drug transaction gone wrong, Léon finds himself the guardian of young Mathilda (Natalie Portman in her screen debut). Taking Mathilda under his helm, Léon teaches her the art of the "cleaner" (killer), and she becomes his apprentice. However, danger lurks around every corner, and Léon must protect Mathilda from the same cops who killed her family.

The Divergent Series-Allegiant Part I, Review: Alley Giant

$
0
0

The Divergent Series-Allegiant Part I, Review: Alley Giant

Three down, one to go. This film is the first of two cinematic parts, based on the novel Allegiant, the final book in the Divergent trilogy, by Veronica Roth, and the third instalment in The Divergent Series of films. On the score board too, the series hits divergent marks. Neil Burger barely scraped through with the Divergent debut two years ago, while German director Robert Schwentke acquitted himself well in Insurgent last year. Schwentke has been retained for this encounter, in the hope that the gent (or is it Herr?) will better himself and emerge a giant. When you take a reality check, you find that ‘The Divergent Series-Allegiant Part I’ has a villain named David, the size of an alley giant, and the gargantuan Goliath is nowhere to be seen.

A little background is in order for first-timers. Roth’s novels have six human classes, clubbed according to personality traits: Abnegation (selflessness), Amity (kindness), Candor (honesty), Dauntless (bravery), and Erudite (intelligence). Anyone who does not conform to one of these five is banished to the city outskirts, as "factionless." A person who values all five virtues equally is known as "Divergent," which makes it six (or seven? I am ‘clueless’).

After seeing that the hostile situation within the city of Chicago is only going to get worse, Tris escapes with Four, Caleb, Christina, Tori, and Peter, to journey beyond the wall that encloses Chicago. Tori is killed by Edgar in the attempt, but is himself is later disabled by an armed group of individuals, with airship support. The soldiers take the group to the Bureau of Genetic Welfare, a highly advanced city, where they learn the truth about their society.

Many years ago, the government believed that society's problems were caused by "damaged genes". In an attempt to create a better society, they began to modify people's genes, with disastrous results. The government set up "experiments" in an attempt to repair this mistake, establishing isolated cities across the remains of the United States. The hope was to raise enough genetically pure Divergent individuals, to fix the "genetic damage" left in the wake of the Purity War.

Tris and Four are tested by Matthew and Nita, to verify and study their Divergence. Tris is shown to be truly Divergent, but Four's genetic structure indicates that his genes are still "damaged". Caleb and Peter are assigned to surveillance teams that monitor Chicago. Matthew then brings Tris to the leader of the Bureau, David. David gives Tris a device that allows her to view her mother's memories, and sees that her mother was rescued and adopted by the Bureau before volunteering to join the Chicago experiment, out of dedication to the project. Tris agrees to help David, in return for his help in restoring peace to Chicago. David claims that only the council he reports to has the power to intervene. Four has doubts about David’s intentions.

There have been different screen adaptors for each book, which might not seem such a good idea in hindsight. One author and four screenplay-writers have proven that, at least here, too many cooks have spoilt Veronica’s bRoth: Stephen Chbosky (Rent, Perks of Being a Wall-flower), Bill Collage (The Transporter Refueled, Exodus: Gods and Kings, Tower Heist), Adam Cooper (The Transporter Refueled, Exodus: Gods and Kings, Tower Heist) and Noah Oppenheim (The Maze Runner). 27 year-old Veronica Roth started writing when she was 12. Divergent (published 2011) was her first novel. Since then, she has published Insurgent and Allegiant, thus completing the trilogy. She describes herself as "… the good kid who came home at a reasonable hour and never did anything wrong." In her fictitious world, though, a lot of people do a lot of wrongs.

As a concept, the theme is novel, but the novelty is fast wearing out. Too many characters and too much sci-fi mean disorientation and a sense of overawe. Everybody seems to be either killing or getting killed, often for petty greed. There is little justification for the hordes who work for David to be doing so and for David to be doing what he is. After a while, the tortoise inspired planes cease to fascinate, even when they turn turtle. The scene where Four reacts to the breaking news of his planned murder and takes the plane down is well-executed, never mind how and why the news was broken to him in the first place.

Robert Schwentke (Flightplan, The Time Traveler's Wife, RED, Conspiracy of Fools, R.I.P.D.) has lost the Flightplan somewhat on this sector, in spite of loads of Time Travel. Hardly any character holds your attention and you can tell from a mile off that David is up to no good, though the gullible Tris can’t. 

Shailene Woodley as Beatrice "Tris" Prior and TheoJames as Tobias "Four" Eaton are the pretty face and the brooding hulk respectively. Ansel Elgort as Caleb Prior is dynamic but Miles Teller as Peter Hayes either deadpans or hams. Incidentally, he could dub for Farhan Akhtar, the Indian actor, and vice versa. As Hayes’ boss, David, Jeff Daniels (The Purple Rose of Cairo, Terms of Endearment, Dumb & Dumber) is also made to stay ‘deceptively’ deadpan and then sadistically ham. Ray Stevenson as Marcus Eaton has to live with the fact that his frame will always dictate what he does in the picture. As the two women out to decimate each other’s clans, white and tight Naomi Watts (Evelyn Johnson-Eaton) and black and bulky Octavia Spencer (Johanna Reyes) pass muster. Watts’ high-level watts are contrasted with Spencer’s lower octaves. Some sympathy is in order for Matthew, played by Bill Skarsgård.

Rating: **

Trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tE8LEPSTK6A

The Jungle Book, Review: Unputdownable

$
0
0

The Jungle Book, Review:Unputdownable

A fitting tribute to the 1967 version on its golden jubilee, The Jungle Book is unputdownable. You might find differences in the two versions, and in the book itself. Don’t bother comparing. If the smooth-sailing songs make you sing-along (a friend seated on my left just wouldn’t stop), even better. Gaze into the volcanic eyes of the animals, marvel at the resourcefulness of the man-cub, and applaud the imagination of the writer who spun this tale 122 years ago.

Indian audiences will see the film a week before its general release, but theatre-goers will be filtered by the U/A certificate, which advises parental guidance and accompaniment. There is a heated debate on whether this rating was justified, considering it is a child’s story with animal characters. But let us not forget that the treatment is dark and the 3D (Disney Digital 3D, RealD 3D and IMAX 3D, depending on your cinema) effect has the fighting and hissing animals leap on to you from the screen.

Mowgli (Neel Sethi) is a man-cub raised by the Indian wolves Raksha (Lupita Nyong'o; the name is a corruption of Raakshas, meaning demon, raksha means protection) and Akela (Giancarlo Esposito; akela means alone in Urdu/Hindi), after his father was killed by a Bengal tiger, Shere Khan (not Kahn, as Disney has spelt him in one place; sher is tiger in Urdu/Hindi), and he was rescued by Bagheera (baagh or vaagh refers to tiger in local lingo), the black panther (Ben Kingsley). When Shere Khan (Idris Elba) threatens his life, since man is seen as a threat and isn't allowed in the jungle, the wolf family and Bagheera decide to take Mowgli away from his jungle home, into human inhabitation, outside, where he would be safe.

Guided by Bagheera, and Baloo (apparently a variation of the original Barloo; a bear is called Bhaloo in Hindi), the bear (Bill Murray), he sets out on a journey of self-discovery, while evading the rapacious Shere Khan. Along the way, Mowgli encounters jungle creatures who do not exactly have his best interests at heart, including Kaa (Scarlett Johansson) the python, and the smooth-talking Bornean (Indonesia) orangutan-resembling hulk, Gigantopithecus, King Louie (Christopher Walken), who tries to coerce Mowgli into giving up the secret to the elusive and deadly "red flower", the animal name for fire.

The 1967 'original', which came to India much later, had an orang-utan, not native to India, and was hence changed to the present animal. The name Louie came from jazz legend Louis Armstrong, who was the inspiration for the original music composers, but the idea of a black man playing a giant ape was considered insensitive in 1965, when the film was being scripted, so they settled for another Louis, also a jazz singer and a band-leader, Louis Prima. Kaa (reportedly Kar in the Kipling original) was male (according to the 1967 movie character details on the Disney UK website).

Justin Marks (Street Fighter: The Legend of Chun Li) is the new writer on this much-filmed and televised series. All essential elements are well-captured. He chooses to bring in Mowgli’s father’s death much later than in the book, and writes-in a James Bond style prologue. Kaa is made female to counterpoise the male dominated cast. Humour is amazingly well-integrated, with only the slightest hint of over-the-top gags. Special mention must be made of the long ‘honey’ sequence. Not so special is the stock scene, wherein Barloo tries to get Mowgli to leave his company and head for the human habitation.

Director Jon Favreau moves on, from Cowboys to Aliens to Iron man to man-cub, with élan. He makes some intelligent moves in The Jungle Book, like delaying the news of Akela’s death, cleverly jump-cutting the Kaa-Barloo combat, suspensefully introducing King Louis, depicting the human settlement as a kind of fleeting shadow-play, and realistically projecting Shere Khan as a mighty adversary. Yes, the prologue reminds you of James Bond in concept, From Russia with Love to be precise, but it does keep you glued to your seat.

The wood-cutter’s encounter with Bagheera is very sketchily brushed off. Most voice-actors under-act, which is not a bad idea. The sound-track is often completely bare, which is surprising in a jungle film. Many important pieces of dialogue are either rushed off or not very clear to us mere Indians. Agreed that the treatment is dark and jungles are dark places by definition, however, why does the general colour of almost every frame have to be so dark that you have to really strain your eyes to search for the characters you can hear. Standard ploy you employ when you cannot be 100% sure that the mouth of the characters moves 100% in sync with the dialogue: have most of the dialogue when their faces are not visible or when you are panning your camera. A couple of scenes towards the climax are unduly long-drawn. With all these imperfections, it’s a wonderful little film Jon has made, and he will remain an audience Favreauite for some to come, at least.

Welcome Neel Sethi of New York, in his feature debut, selected out of thousands of young boys, from four countries, who auditioned for the part. Now 12, he learned parkour (see below) for the role, looks normal as opposed to many ‘so cute’ debutants, walks and talks naturally, without being precocious or sounding glib. Being the only one human actor (ignoring the Ritesh Rajan cameo as his father), acting against a blue screen, with motion capture figures and muppets as co-stars, he has done a fine job. Of course, having no-competition has its own advantages.

Excellent support comes from:

Garry Shandling as Ikki

Brighton Rose as Grey Brother

Jon Favreau as Pygmy Hog

Sam Raimi as Giant Squirrel

Russell Peters as Rocky the Rhino

Madeleine Favreau as Raquel the Rhino

The Jungle Book music is by Favreau favourite John Debney. Favreau and Debney have re-used several songs from the 1967 animated film, also made by Disney. "The Bare Necessities" (what a delight!), originally written by Terry Gilkyson, is included and sung by Murray (and how!) and Sethi. "Trust in Me", a version of Land of Sand, from the film Mary Poppins, and "I Wan'na Be Like You", written by Richard M. Sherman and Robert B. Sherman, are performed by Johansson and Walken, respectively. Richard M. Sherman wrote new lyrics for Walken's version of "I Wan’na Be Like You".

Most songs are in the jazz/soul mould, easy on the ears, and many play on as the end credit titles roll, so don’t leave till you have heard them all.

It’s a jungle out there. It completely computer-made, a tehcnological milestone. That’s where you should be heading.

Rating: ****

Trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RYbD8roPxxE

Parkour is a method of physical training that develops one’s ability to overcome obstacles, both physical and mental. It involves movement that will help if one is in a ‘reach or escape’ emergency situation.  Underpinning this is a philosophy of altruism and useful strength, longevity, self-improvement and self-understanding.

The skills of Parkour do not only apply to an urban environment, they can be utilised anywhere, in a forest, desert, mountains etc. It is not just the way you move that makes you a practitioner of Parkour, but the movement, combined with the philosophy that defines it.

French actor David Belle, founder of parkour, credits the primary development of Parkour from time spent  with his father, Raymond Belle. David’s father was a child soldier in Vietnam. As part of his training he had to complete obstacle courses called ‘Parcours’ (from French, meaning course). Now 43, David has worked with directors Brian de Palma and Luc Besson.

Demolition, Review: Shun

$
0
0

Demolition, Review: Shun

If ever there was a practical example of ‘deconstruction for the sake of reconstruction’ being taken too literally, here is one. Our protagonist, a tormented and meandering soul, cannot cope with the loss of his wife, which tragedy has benumbed him. So, he remembers what his father-in-law once said, that in order to rebuild something, you have to demolish it first. His father is a more than sane investment banker and his own boss (which means that our hero, too, is not the kind you would derisively call ‘Dumbo’), but the son-in-law fails to see any symbolism in the advice, and proceeds to implement it in the letter. He first picks up a tool-kit and uses them to take appliances apart. Not satisfied with these minor ‘breaks’, he starts using a hammer and then a sledge-hammer, on walls and furniture. Heavy duty drills come next. Hilarious? How I wish it was!

Demolition is about 38 year-old Davis Mitchell (Jake Gyllenhaal), a successful investment banker. It begins with him absent-mindedly listening to his wife Julia (Heather Lind) while she drives them to work. Suddenly, a car crashes into theirs. Both are hospitalised. He sustains only minor injuries, Julia, who bore the brunt of the accident, dies after admission. Shattered, but very hungry too, Davis tries to use the hospital’s machine to get a candy packet, only to have the candy bar trapped on the metal shelf. He inserts many coins, but nothing comes out. After a hospital staffer tells him that they cannot help, Davis sends a letter to the vending- machine’s customer service division, complaining, and asking for a refund. But what starts as a “You owe me 75 cents” letter turns into a series of long confessionals and background info, about how he never really loved his wife, and how he has no idea what to do with his life anymore.

The customer service rep who receives these letters is Karen (Naomi Watts), a pot-addict with anxiety issues and a 17 year-old son, Chris (Judah Lewis), who uses M-80 firecrackers to drive home his point during oral presentations at school. Karen falls in love with Davis’s letters, and by association, falls in love with Davis. She starts to follow him around town, eventually calling him on phone, but avoiding a meeting. They finally meet, and Davis is enamoured with her. During this time, Davis creates an unhealthy desire to demolish things. Doesn’t matter if it’s an espresso machine, a vase, or his own house. He seemingly needs to destroy whatever he comes across, even as his in-laws, Phil (Chris Cooper) and Margot (Polly Draper) want to institute a scholarship in Julia’s memory.

Brian Sipe (some indie work, a film called The Choice) has written the screenplay for this film, which was featured in the 2007 Blacklist ("most liked" unmade scripts of the year). It is easy to cock a snook and say that it deserved to remain unmade, but that would be unfair. There is a lot of black humour in this ‘Blacklisted’ (incidentally, director Jean-Marc Vallée had made a film called Blacklist; talk of co-incidences!) film, only the actors and director were unable to convey or trigger it. All of them are taking their jobs too seriously. A major part of film comedy comes from action/reaction, timing and irreverence. The jokes and gags are all there. Language-based, situational and farcical genres line the narrative. I laughed out loud at least six times during the screening. So what is the problem? Only one of the 19 other reviewers watching the film found anything funny. In Demolition, you need to ‘not sympathise’ with the characters, no matter what pain they are going through, and just laugh at what they are saying or doing. And that is not likely to happen.

Jean-Marc Vallée (Dallas Buyers Club, The Young Victoria, Wild) has an unpredictable script that can only work as a black comedy. He had made a popular comic film early in his career, called, Stereotypes. This time, the genre eludes his grasp. There are some deft touches, like the opening car accident and the way Davis’s late wife’s pregnancy is discussed between him and his in-laws. For the rest, the film is largely script and emotion-driven. Maybe he was hoping to keep it subtle, unlike the Hindi films of the 1940s-80s, wherein every emotion, including comedy, used to be heavily augmented by suitable, loud, background music. Sadly for Vallée, a Canadian, the experiment has failed.

Demolition is the third film to bring together Jake Gyllenhaal and Chris Cooper, after Jarhead (2005) and October Sky (1999). They make a fine duo. Jacob Benjamin Gyllenhaal, 35 (Brokeback Mountain, Nightcrawler, Southpaw) previously played a man dealing with the tragic death of his wife in Southpaw (2015) and Moonlight Mile (2002). No issues with that. The issue is: you did not need an over-intense, over-depressed, over-grieving, simmering maniac performance for this role. Perhaps you did not need Jake Gyllenhaal at all, perhaps you needed a Johnny Depp or even a Jim Carrey. No excuse, though. Naomi Watts (You Will Meet a Tall Dark Stranger, The Impossible, Birdman, The Divergent Series: Insurgent and Allegiant) plays the female counterpart of Davis, in a much more understated way. Judah Lewis (Point Break) comes across as a really messed up teenager and the philosophical discussion between Davis and him about the F word is both crude and corny, and the laughter it elicits is more derisive than appreciative.

Chris Cooper (American Beauty, The Bourne Identity, The Amazing Spiderman 2) is another intense actor, with a malleable face. Good for the casting, limited by opportunities. As Karen’s love interest, C.J. Wilson is just the hunk, though not in a very well-written part. Polly Draper has chiselled features, Debra Monk and Malachy Cleary have bit roles as Davis’s parents, Blaire Brooks is made to put on the same ‘what’s going on’ look all through the film, while Wass Stevens makes an effective real-life demolition man, in one of the comic scenes that works.

You know what? Demolition makes just that much more sense a day after you have seen it, as you deconstruct and then reconstruct it in your mind. Too late. Jean-Marc has missed the mark. Demolition is a movie to shun.

Rating: * ½

Trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3UnSXelOJo0


FRAMES, FICCI’s Media & Entertainment conclave, attracts 20 countries

$
0
0

FRAMES, FICCI’s Media & Entertainment conclave, attracts 20 countries

FRAMES is big. There is no M&E (Media and Entertainment) event in the country bigger than FRAMES. For many years now, the venue is the idyllic hotel in Mumbai’s lake-district, and the only thing wrong with the location is the distance that many attendees have to cover to get there. To those unfortunate visitors who live either at the southern end of the island or the outer suburbs in the north, it could be a two-hour journey, one-way. For those coming from other cities or other countries, this is a non-issue. Delegates include speakers, exhibitors, country partners and industry professionals. Among them are many NRI friends, who travel from the USA or Europe and meet me only at this event, year after year. Every year, there is at least one country partner, and in 2016, it was Turkey.

‘Change or Perish – The Year of Digital’ was the theme running through the conclave, which was fine, but there was no need to keep drumming it ad nauseam.  FICCI always invites a Union Minister for the inauguration, and this time it was Mr. Ravi Shankar Prasad, holding the Communications & Information Technology portfolios. He set the tone by remarking, “India’s talent combined with the power of Information Technology would act as a springboard to launch India into the big league.”

Mr. Prasad said that the Government of India recognised the importance and relevance of promoting the media and entertainment industry. Hence, visa processes were being eased for film shootings. Besides the National Centre of Excellence was coming up for the M&E industry and a new film facilitation office was also being set up. The Minister said that for government campaigns like Make in India, Skill India, Digital India and Smart Cities, ‘digital’ was the foundation. He added that to bridge the digital divide in the country, there was a need for empowering India, digitally.

Mr. Mukesh Ambani, Chairman, Reliance Industries Ltd., was also present at the inaugural and stressed that India was poised to become a $100 billion industry in the coming decade, but still ranked 150th, in access to internet and mobile. Mr. Uday Shankar, Chairman, FICCI Media & Entertainment Committee, & CEO, Star India, said that India cannot remain in a state of denial, as the world was changing, and it was time India adopted and embraced digitisation. “Power of stories will remain, and breaking away from the traditional media, the digital media was making way for new stories,” he added.  Dr. A. Didar Singh, Secretary General, FICCI, said that this year delegations from almost 20 countries were participating in FICCI FRAMES.

The Government of India is making a conscious effort to move towards less regulation of the media and entertainment industry, and is encouraging auto regulation by industry,” said Mr. Sunil Arora, Secretary, Ministry of Information & Broadcasting, at a keynote session on ‘Making India a Global M&E Hub’. Mr. Arora said that the industry had time and again raised the issue of ‘clearances’, hence the government was easing and liberalising the process of security clearances, to allow greater flexibility for the film fraternity. Speaking about the FM radio station licence auctions, he said after the successful auction last year, a  new set of rules have been submitted to the Cabinet, for the next phase of FM radio auctions.

Underlining the challenges for making India a global M&E hub, Mr. Arora said that the theatre density (number of cinemas in relation to the population) of the country left a lot to be desired (India has 9,000-10,000 cinemas only, a poor comparison to many other nations). There was a need to increase the number of theatres in the country. On the taxation side, he said that the levies would be rationalised automatically once the GST is in place.

In an all-star session, ‘Change or Perish:  Surviving the Digital Divide’, the luminaries on stage were Mr. Aroon Purie, Chairman & Editor-in-Chief, The India Today Group; Mr. Arthur Bastings, President and Managing Director, Discovery Asia-Pacific; Mr. Sudhanshu Vats, Group CEO, Viacom18; Mr. Siddharth Roy Kapur, Managing Director, Disney India; Mr. Vikram Chandra, Executive Director & CEO, NDTV Group and Mr. Neeraj Roy, CEO, Hungama

Mr. Bastings commented that in the digital sector, the players were still looking for a way to drive the emerging medium. Business plans were still evolving. He added that the consumption measurement system of television was bad, and there was a need for a better and more reliable method. Mr. Vats reminded us that, on the digital platform, it was easier to measure and gauge the number of actual users, track the content consumption and pattern of consumer behaviour, in comparison to traditional media, like television, where the consumer behaviour was based on a small sample of consumers. Speaking on the relevance of the big screen in the era of emerging digital platforms, Mr. Kapur, whose company makes mainly film content, was of the opinion that cinema was being consumed on small screens, but big screens will continue to exist. However, the type of content will play a critical role while audience will decide to choose a medium to watch a movie.

Last year, FRAMES started Frame Your Idea (FYI) for those with a creative spark and the burning desire to achieve success in celluloid but no access to makers. Across the three days of FYI, over 2700 meetings were held between 300 writers/idea owners and over 70 producers/studios/broadcasters. Panellists included an international who’s who: Rajkumar Hirani Films, Dharma Productions (Karan Johar),  Rohit Shetty Productions, Disney Films, Drishyam Films, Salman Khan Films, Film Karavan Shemaroo Entertainment, Fox Star Studio, Tips Industries, Eros, Viacom18 Motion Pictures, John Abraham Productions, Kabir Khan Films (Kabir had a Master Class too, with Vidhu Vinod Chopra), Macguffin Pictures, Phantom Films, Vishesh Films(Mahesh Bhatt), BBC Worldwide India Phantom Films, Star Plus, ZEE TV, Cartoon Network , Shemaroo Entertainment, Nickelodeon and more.

Besides Kabir Khan (director Phantom, Bajrangi Bhaijan, Ek Tha Tiger, Kabul Express, New York), Asif Kapadia, the England-based 2016 Oscar winner for Amy (Best Documentary, also Britain’s highest grossing documentary ever) and the maker of F1 racing driver Ayrton Senna’s biopic, also had a master class. With family origins in Gujarat, 44 year-old Kapadia was born and educated in England. Speaking at 200 words per minute (beyond 180 is almost incomprehensible) , he came across a gifted, albeit proud, film- maker who admires Alfred Hitchcock, hates rules and is not crazy about technology. He also did not take too kindly to my observation that there was too much movement in his films, of people as well as vehicles. Likewise, a couple of speakers dealing with the topic of Indian sports on TV weren’t really excited about my scepticism about coverage and commentary of kabbadi, based on memories of my days at ESPN, Singapore.

Attendance at FRAMES 2016 was low overall, and quite a few of those present came only to network, not to attend any sessions. One reason for the low turnout could be the shift in dates. Over the last few years, the event has moved from the third week of March to the end of the month. Many regulars who have been blocking their calendars based on previous editions were unable to adjust their schedules to match the staggered dates. Though unaffected by this shift, personally, I had three points as feedback: fewer sessions than before are a welcome development, rather than the earlier obsession with cramping 10-12 sessions into a day; with time, budgets should increase, rather than tighten, as was felt this year; management should be more efficient and friendlier, than evidenced in 2016.

The Istanbul Chamber of Commerce and Tourism led a delegation to promote collaboration in the Cinema and Television sectors, between India and Turkey. Companies participating in the delegation were Ayyapim, Kadraj, Kanal 7, Outline Ajans, Pana Film, Tac Medya, TRT (Turkish Radio and Television Corporation) and ULKE TV. His Excellency, Mr. Burak Akçapar, the Turkish Ambassador to India, later announced, “Turkey is predicting content exports of USD 20 million to India by 2018." Feriha (original title Adini Feriha Koydum), a Turkish TV programme currently being beamed on Zee Zindagi, reportedly has a viewership of 36 million/week. The series, which had a 67-episode run in Turkey that ended in January 2016, is about a young, beautiful girl from a lower middle class family, named Feriha. Her father is a janitor in an upper-class neighbourhood of Istanbul, while her mother is a house-keeper. Feriha gets a scholarship and joins a private university. There, she feigns being a rich girl. As it happens, she meets a handsome, rich boy called Emir Sarrafoğlu. Then, ...catch it on TV.

All said and done, the lingering memories of FICCI FRAMES 2016 include the faces of the beautiful women from the Turkish delegation, and the tasty balaclava and nuts they distributed to a select sample. Feriha might have mixed responses, but everybody is nuts about balaclava.

The Huntsman-Winter’s War, Review: Ice Maiden and Sinister Sister

$
0
0

The Huntsman-Winter’s War, Review: Ice Maiden and Sinister Sister

What? No Snow White in the title? Right. Almost no Snow White in the picture too. Many Huntsmen, one ‘The Huntsman’, two evil queen sisters who hate everybody, including each other, a few dwarves, a kingdom of gnomes and monsters, and the ubiquitous mirror that often steals the image (read: scene).

Evil Queen Ravenna (Charlize Theron), who has the power of shooting tentacles to wrap her opponents, betrays her good sister Freya (Emily Blunt) by killing her new-born child, born out of wedlock. This horrendous act freezes Freya’s heart to love, and unleashes in her an icy power she never knew she possessed: producing tons of ice by a mere twist of the hand. Retreating to a kingdom far to the north, Freya captures boys and girls, and trains them as an army of Huntsmen, her protectors and plunderers. She also imposes one strong rule with an iron hand: no two of them should ever fall in love.

As a war for domination escalates between the two queens, the hero standing between them is Freya’s most elite Huntsman, Eric (Chris Hemsworth). Alongside him is fellow warrior and faultless archer, Sara (Jessica Chastain), the only woman who has ever captured his heart. Hopelessly in love, the two have violated Freya’s commandment, and face her wrath. Eric must also help Freya vanquish her sister…or Ravenna’s wickedness will rule for eternity.

This 2016 version is credited to three writers. Evan Daugherty (Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, Divergent) is given his due for the characters he created in the 2012 Snow White and the Huntsman. Evan Spiliotopoulos (Hercules, Tinker Bell and the Lost Treasure, Battle for Terra) and Craig Mazin (The Hangover/s, Identity Thief, Scary Movie/s) are the two writers who worked on this edition. Finding means of taking a very familiar story backwards and forwards is always challenging to any writer, and the duo have come out with just about acceptable results.

A kingdom where men and women falling in love is forbidden (this is neither an exclusive nor inclusive observation, merely confined to the film), and a locket that can save a life, are tropes that were common in Hindi films from the 1940s till the 1970s. Maybe it came this way from the Hollywood movies of the 1930s-50s! It is still quite incredible that two queens could enslave hordes merely under the fear of unleashing their power when disobeyed. Surely they could have been vanquished before they realised it. There is some lack of clarity on the various kings and queens and goblins, and the reasons/commitments in the conflicts. Maybe some of it is lost in the accented dialogue and digital sound mixing.

Directed by Frenchman Cedric Nicolas-Troyan, visual effects supervisor of the 2012 Snow White and the Huntsman, Winter’s War has a judicious mix of technical wizardry and emotional narrative. The mirror, as expected, is the centre-piece, while the forest is as god as Disney gets. Nicolas-Troyan shows a keen sense of humour in executing the scenes with the dwarves, sometimes even letting the dialogue get indulgent. Casting of Jessica Chastain is commendable, the director avoiding falling into the pit of choosing a drop-dead gorgeous face to match the Brad Pitt-esque persona of the lead actor.

And that lead actor is Chris Hemsworth (Star Trek, Thor, Avengers), tall, well-built without being brawny, just that wee bit vulnerable. Here, Thor wields an axe, but with little result. He has a lot of fighting, not often emerging the winner. Charlize Theron (Snow White and the Huntsman, Mad Max: FuryRoad) is her usual, ravenous self. Half dead, half alive, made to go around her sister in circles, striking sinister poses and whispering venom, she is convincing. Jessica Chastain (Zero Dark Thirty, Interstellar, The Martian) makes the best of a meaty role. She shows guts and gumption, and an indomitable spirit. Emily Blunt (The Devil Wears Prada, The Jane Austen Book Club, Sicario) wins the audiences’ sympathy when targetted by her sister, and even in her Ice Maiden incarnation, she essays the dual traits of victim and perpetrator effectively.

Nick Frost reprises his role from the four-years ago outing as the dwarf Nion, in the company of three others cast in similar parts: Rob Brydon (Welsh TV comic), Sheridan Smith (British TV and theatre actress) and Alexandra Roach (The Iron Lady, Anna Karenina, Welsh TV actress). It’s fun when they are around, in a segment that stands on its own against so much evil and fighting. Sope Dirisu (British TV actor, small part in Criminal) plays the black boy, Tull, who develops a soft corner for his fellow Huntsman, Eric. Stock character, stock casting.

The Huntsman: Winter’s War represents the not so new genre of fairy-stories that are really violent and depict the worst machinations of the human brain. But it is considerably less disturbing than many other films seen in recent years. That might dilute its impact. Again, in an era when CGI and VFX rule the roost, Nicolas-Troyan’s approach of not going over-board (which is fine with this reviewer) might work against the film.

Rating: **1/2

Trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_22uUuXX94Q+

Sujata Mehta: Teaching grandma to suck eggs

$
0
0

Sujata Mehta: Teaching grandma to suck eggs

Yesteryear film actress and popular stage performer Sujata Mehta is someone known to me from the 1980s. Her husband, Latesh Shah, is known me perhaps a little longer. Both were stage actors, with Latesh also being a gifted director. Both won prizes at inter-college short play competitions, including those organised by the Indian People’s Theatre Association (IPTA), where I had occasion to serve as judge. Sujata got film breaks, like Pratighaat and Yateem, but soon disappeared from the big screen, the phenomenon ascribed by media to her snootiness, haughtiness, pride and ego. TV audiences recall her good work in Khandan and Shrikant. We even did a featured interview of her in TV&Video World, a magazine I used to edit in the late 80s.

She continued her work in Gujarati theatre, as did Latesh, Gujarati being their mother tongue, notching up milestones. Latesh also got to assist Hindi feature film directors Kundan Shah and Aziz Mirza (some of ShahRukh Khan’s earliest TV and film work was with these two) and Madhur Bhandarkar. Belonging to a community known for its astute business sense, Latesh also set-up two textile showrooms, one in central and another in suburban Mumbai. I did bump into the couple on a couple of occasions, back in the mid 90s, and then lost contact, partly due to my 8-year stay in Singapore.

Last year, when I saw Sujata at FICCI-FRAMES, with Latesh, donning a hat, red-Indian hair locks and pendants to boot, her call of “Actor” reverberated in my memory. In the good old days, when I would go for my lectures in Communication at the Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, Chowpatty, I would often find her sitting on the steps of the auditorium where she performed. Now, since I was better known to many as a lecturer and journalist, including her, she used to make a joke of the fact that I was an actor too, and yell out’ “Actor”! Instead, I was met with a blank look. It took a while before recognition dawned upon her. Could not blame her—twenty years is a real long time. Sujata and Latesh (who could not remember me at all, even after sharing nostalgic tit-bits about his old play Galileo) gave me their cards, which told me that they were running some high-profile training and coaching programmes.

April 22, 2016. I got a call from somebody called Shilpa, inviting me to attend Sujata Mehta’s pre-launch briefing about her forthcoming acting training workshop. I told her that I am a trainer myself, and Sujata knows it. So, I am not a prospective student. Shilpa insisted that Sujata wanted me to come nevertheless.  Presuming this was a kind of press conference and briefing, I said I would try, but it was not likely that I would make it, since there were no less than four other events on Saturday, 23 April evening, clashing heading with hers. On Saturday evening, I mulled over the options, and, fatal mistake, decided to go to Prime Mall in Irla, suburban Mumbai, to give her my best wishes.

I was made to register, given enrolment forms, a questionnaire and a promo print-out, though I insisted I was not even a probable candidate for enrolment. Both these documents were poorly produced. There were about 30-32 persons inside, including a few children and at least 10 of the duo’s own team, some of them on recruiting duty, some to provide demonstrations and testimonials, which, to my discerning eye, were well-rehearsed and planted. Latesh Shah held forth, with Sujata coming up later, interspersed with audience participation and audio-visuals about Sujata and of some former students, who greatly benefitted from the training. Almost all the practicals were based on the classical nava rasas, the nine emotions classified in ancient Indian dance and acting texts.

Called Superstar Jalsa (jalsa means celebration in some Indian languages), the programme promises to teach you communication, acting, body language salesmanship, unlock all the doors of your mind and more, in just three days, 10 hours a day. There was never any denying that Latesh and Sujata were talented performers. As speakers, Latesh speaks at 180-200 words per minute, just about intelligible. Sujata sticks to 160-180, nearer normal, but gropes a little. In terms of command over English, both of them need to work on it. When it comes to Hindi, they are better, but still need to work on it.

Inhospitable as can be, they offered nothing, to persons who might have travelled up to ninety minutes either way, as beverage or food. So, somebody who left home at 6 pm to reach the venue by 7.30, and then left the far from Prime Mall at 9.30 pm, to reach home by 11 pm, was not even offered a glass of water. And mind you, some of these invitees were prospective participants, expected to shell-out Rs. 20,000 ($600+) each. I was the only Editor/journalist around, and journalists who are invited to events after 7 pm are, nine times out of ten, offered cocktails and dinner. Guess what was I offered? Intense brainwashing! A bevy of ‘duties’, comprising Shiraz Daruwala, Aishwarya and Shilpa, was let loose on me. Shiraz first made small talk about how our names were similar, and why I should consider joining a Parsee group visiting Iran (part of my ancestry is Iranian). That was fine. And then....?

Insisting that she has read my expressions as ‘windows to my mind’, Shiraz went on and on about why I should join the workshops, either SSJ or SP2 (at first I thought these were names of the Iran tours; later I realised SSJ was Superstar Jalsa and SP2 is some corporate training that Latesh does). At the cost of being branded immodest, I had to tell her that I have been acting since I was 3 ½, have been conducting training of a similar (like Sujata and Latesh) nature since 1984, some of my former students are heads of TV channels and top actors in Bollywood  ...but nothing would convince her. Aishwarya chipped in rather sheepishly and Shilpa was not very pushy either. It took a lot of effort on my part to remain cool, and not give Shiraz a real piece of my mind. Are you so desperate to entrap candidates?

I m not going to tell you how to do your business, Sujata and Latesh, but what you tried on me was a big error in judgement. I came to give you my best wishes and this is how showed your gratitude. There’s a very old saying about misguided persons who try, “Teaching a grandma to suck eggs.” Loosely interpreted, it means don’t try and force a Ph.D. to enrol in a play-school. Very bad idea.

Consider this. Superstar Jalsa lasts three days, 10 hours each. That makes 30 hours. I charge Rs. 5,000/hour as professional fees. For 30 hours, I would charge Rs. 1,50,000. Now, if you are keen on having me attend the workshop, pay me this amount, and I will attend.

10 Cloverfield Lane, Review: Hollowcaust

$
0
0

10 Cloverfield Lane, Review: Hollowcaust

Ultra-thin story line, with some slick moments in the first half, is how one can sum up 10 Cloverfield Lane. A psychological, science fiction, holocaust, suspense tale, the film needed a rock solid unravelling. Instead, it goes off on an indulgent tangent, and you come out wondering, “So this was what it was all about?”

It is the second film in the Cloverfield franchise. The film was developed from a script titled The Cellar, but while under production, by the Bad Robot production company, it was turned into a ‘spiritual successor’ of the 2008 film, Cloverfield (it is by no means a sequel). 10 Cloverfield Lane began as an “ultra low budget" spec script, penned by John Campbell and Matt Stuecken. Damien Chazelle was brought in to rewrite their draft, and to direct the movie as well. Chazelle did work on the script, but dropped out from directing, when his Whiplash project received funding—a very wise decision indeed, in retrospect.

Michelle (Mary Elizabeth Winstead) has had a break-up with her fiancé, Ben (Bradley Cooper, voice only). She packs her belongings, leaves her home and drives far from the city. Michelle takes her eyes off the road for a second, when her car gets slammed by a truck, causing her to tumble down into a ditch. She wakes up in a small room, with a head-wound and a needle in her arm that's hooked to a saline drip. To her horror, she sees her leg is chained to a pipe. Someone comes downstairs to open the door to the room. It is a man who introduces himself as Howard (John Goodman). He claims to have rescued Michelle from the car accident offers Michelle a pair of wooden crutches.

Howard calmly explains to Michelle that there has been an attack on the surface, and that the air up there is ‘unbreathable’, so he brought Michelle down to the bunker he has built beneath his farm. Howard brings Michelle up to the airlock, to see what's going on outside. Nothing appears unusual, but Michelle spots Howard's truck with red paint on the side, and she recognises it as the truck that hit her.

Michelle soon meets a younger man named Emmett (John Gallagher, Jr.). His arm is in a sling, and Howard tells Michelle that Emmett knocked over a shelf with a week's worth of food supplies. Emmett explains that he willingly joined Howard in building the bunker. He also claims to have seen the attack occur, describing a red flash and running to get inside, which he says explains his broken arm. After some developments, the two realise that Howard is a threat, and they need to get out of there. But just as their plan begins to takes shape, Howard discovers it. Emmett takes the blame, but Howard shoots him in the head.

Josh Campbell (4 Minute Mile, basically an editor) and Matthew Stuecken (mostly a producer) are credited with the story and screenplay, which might have worked as short film idea. Even then, it would have needed to have a more convincing ending. Damien Chazelle (Whiplash, Grand Piano, The Last Exorcism Part II)’s contribution here would not stand anywhere in front of his Whiplash effort. Red herrings, including ear-rings, are strategically placed, and there is no hearing after that. Maybe it is all part of a grand sequel plot, but for us, unsuspecting one-time viewers, the plot ‘thinnens’, not thickens! How does the kidnapped heroine become a bull terrier, the moment she finds that she is being held captive, is beyond comprehension. Also, the manner in which Emmett is shot dead at point blank range closes the chapter on the most endearing character, rather abruptly and needlessly. Keeping us guessing about the intentions of Howard is indeed suspenseful, though not so if the suspense continues after the end credit titles have rolled.

Dan Trachtenberg (TV and shorts)’s feature debut is uneven and a bit of a let-down. He has a powerful cast to work with, yet ends up just letting things roll by. In parts, the film is good like the games the trio play, the music from the juke-box, and the choice Michelle makes in the end. Unfortunately, it is his inability to integrate them into a cohesive whole is what causes the disappointment      

John Goodman (63 in June, of English, Welsh, and German ancestry; King Ralph, The Big Lebowski, The Flintstones, The Artist, Argo, Trumbo) is a dependable actor. Even when it is not clear who or why he is, he keeps things going, by sheer force of performance. Mary Elizabeth Winstead (Scott Pilgrim v/s the World, A Good Day to Die Hard, Abraham Lincoln Vampire Hunter) has an ill-defined role, and passes just about muster. We needed more of the good-natured banter provided by John Gallagher Jr. (The Heart Machine, Hush, Short Term 12). Bradley Cooper is the hapless Ben, and it could have been voiced by anyone.

Credit titles, both in the beginning and at the end, are attractively done.

What could have been a nerve-wracking, edge-of-the-seat package, turns out hollow, once you get below the Cloverfield surface, into the bunker/cellar.

Rating: **

Trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8LnlvCqvZsA

Mother’s Day, Review: Mom Com

$
0
0

Mother’s Day, Review: Mom Com

Mother of two sons and a dedicated wife, philandering husband falling for sexy new babe, grieving widower raising two daughters, an aging couple who discover that they have an Indian for a son-in-law and a woman for the other daughter’s partner, an out-of-wedlock abandoned child of a mother who is now a TV celebrity...all set for a Mom Com, made for, and aimed at, Mother’s Day. Well, it could have been a Rom Com, except for the fact that so many of the women are married, and mothers. Add some genuine joie de vivre, and some not so genuine teary stuff, that is what you have on offer in Mother’s Day. It almost works, till you realise that the plot is playing to stereo-types, and when it does get into some off-beat humour, it goes over-board.

Four writers have pooled their penmanship for this day: Tom Hines, (director Marshall’s regular actor gets a writing break), Lily Hollander (her first too), Anya Kochoff (earlier wrote Monster-in-Law), Matthew Walker (Valentine’s Day, New Year’s Eve). Sometimes, such a coming together also results in too many characters as well as fluctuations in plot flow. Superficially, the characters blend seamlessly, but on deeper insight, they are parallels strung together. Marshall is the man who made Valentine’s Day and New Year’s Eve, and two of the four writers are part of his retinue. Over the last 3-4 years, an increasing number of Hollywood films have shown a penchant for story-lines that were common in the Hindi cinema of the 50s and 60s. The Mumbai film industry has tried to resurrect it time and again, in the last 50 years, with little success. It is very likely that these tropes came from Hollywood in the first place, so they have an equal right to hark back to them.

Garry Kent Maschiarelli ‘Marshall’ (New Year's Eve, Valentine's Day, The Princess Diaries I and II, Runaway Bride, Pretty Woman) has done some great work, and was instrumental in shaping Julia Roberts’ career. After Valentine’s Day and New Year’s Eve, his third, day-based outing comes when he turns 82. Treatment-wise, there is a sensitivity that you find in the films of many female directors. An all-star cast, many from Marshall’s earlier credits, and some highly talented debutants, manage to induct some warmth and both, subtle as well as blasé, comedy. In the end, a lot of it turns out to be simplistic and predictable. He has it in him, and a Labor Day or Boxing Day or Father’s Day cannot be ruled out. But will it get any fresher? That will depend upon the script, more than Garry Marshall.

Jennifer Aniston (Horrible Bosses, I and II, The Switch, The Bounty Hunter, Love Happens, He's Just Not That into You) is the chubby and gullible mother of two sons, Sandy. Cute face but age catching-up, are features that go well with her character. Timothy Olyphant (The Crazies, Elektra Luxx, I Am Number Four) is her wayward husband, Henry, with only the anatomical display of a girl named Tina to justify his straying. Tina is Shay Mitchell (born in Canada to a Filipina mother and a Scot-Irish-Hispanic father; first feature release), and is comfortable as the sex-kitten, but gropes (reverse pun not intended) her way around the non-sexy scenes.

Julia Roberts (Pretty Woman, Sleeping with the Enemy, Notting Hill, Runaway Bride, Erin Brockovich, Valentine's Day, Eat Pray Love, August: Osage County) plays Miranda, the TV host who anchors a women’s products marketing channel and is a household name because of it. She has nothing much to do for most of the film, but has her five minutes of glory towards the end. The character seems to have been modelled after Joan Collins, though not look-wise. Kate Hudson (daughter of Academy Award–winning actress Goldie Hawn and actor Bill Hudson; Italian, Hungarian Jewish, English and German blood) is the woman who has secretly married an Indian, against her parents’ wishes, and therefore keeps avoiding them. Hudson is able to come out both strong and vulnerable. As the man in her life, Russell, Aasif Mandvi (Aasif Hakim Mandviwala, born in Mumbai, from the Dawoodi Bohra community of Indian Muslims, lived in England, father moved to the US; Die Hard With a Vengeance, Spiderman 2, Million Dollar Arm) is so-so.

Cameron Esposito (Sleight, First Girl I Loved, Operator) as the manly partner of the two lesbians, Max, has a brief role, and carries it well. Initially seen only on Skype, Margo Martindale (Dead Man Walking, Hannah Montana: The Movie, August-Osage County) as Flo, the mother of the two women who spring shocks on her, and Robert Pine (Independence Day, Jobs, Decoding Annie Parker) as her husband, Earl, make a couple of bubbly seniors. As Bradley’s late wife, Dada, who appears in videos and pictures only, Jennifer Garner (Valentine’s Day, Dallas Buyers Club, Danny Collins) has a cameo.

Jason Sudeikis (The Bounty Hunter, A Good, Old-fashioned Orgy, Horrible Bosses 2), as the gym instructor single father, has talent, part of it wasted in stock expressions and stilted dialogue delivery. Ella Anderson (Scream 4, Tomorrowland) is cast as Vicky, Bradley’s teenage daughter, whose personal hygiene requirements embarrass him no end, and whose romantic interest at this early age bothers him too. Their scenes together could have been better written and better directed. Watch out for Jack Whitehall (Zack), Brit to the core, and immensely talented. The stand-up comic act was not up to the mark, yet he showed great presence. And don’t miss the little gig performed by Vicky’s tiny black friend, Ariana Neal. Marshall’s camera stays on her much after the scene has ended.

Coming from the giant womb designed by two women in the film as an exhibit for Mother’s Day, this delivery is normal. The baby appeared to have potential, but at the end of 118 minutes, we did not see too much of it.

Rating: ** ½

Trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Zc8aupzxTs

Captain America-Civil War, Review: Danger...Us?

$
0
0

Captain America-Civil War, Review: Danger...Us?

Emerging from the 2006 Marvel Comic storyline, Civil War, this is a top heavy assembly, where the heroes get divided into two camps and battle it out, before realising that unity in diversity must come first, and egos should take second billing. It is about two superstars taking opposing, dictatorial stances, but with so many characters doing their bit for the fans, the film is a democratic treatise. Villains, by comparison, are poorly delineated. Marvel regulars will have smooth sailing. For others, the lack of back-stories means some things are amiss, and when you are trying to grasp a narrative, with several insider jokes, ignorance is not bliss.

In 1991, towards the end of the Cold War, Hydra operatives in Siberia revive Bucky Barnes from a cryogenic state, and condition him to be completely obedient to anyone who recites certain trigger words. He is dispatched to intercept an automobile, carrying a case of super-soldier serum, and assassinate its occupants. Approximately one year after Ultron's defeat at the hands of the Avengers, Steve Rogers, Natasha Romanoff, Sam Wilson, and Wanda Maximoff, stop Brock Rumlow from stealing a biological weapon from a lab in Lagos, Nigeria. Wanda attempts to levitate away Rumlow as he detonates a suicide bomb, but the explosion destroys a building, killing several Wakandan relief workers. The international community responds with alarm, and distrust of the Avengers.

At the team's headquarters, Secretary of State, Thaddeus Ross informs the Avengers that, unsupervised, they pose a danger, and the United Nations is preparing to pass the Sokovia Accords, which will establish an international governing body, to oversee and control the Avengers. The team is divided over the accords: Tony Stark supports supervision, because he feels guilty for creating Ultron, leading to the subsequent destruction in Sokovia, while Rogers is distrustful of governmental agendas, and prefers the Avengers to remain free, to act on their own.

Unable to convince Rogers to support the accords, Romanoff attends their ratification in Vienna, immediately after which a bombing kills King T'Chaka, of Wakanda. T'Chaka's son, T'Challa, vows to kill the bomber, whom security footage indicates is Barnes. Rogers recruits Wanda, Clint Barton, and Scott Lang to join his team. Stark convinces Ross to let him bring his renegade comrades in, and assembles Romanoff, T'Challa, James Rhodes, and Vision, as well as young hero, Peter Parker, the to-be Spider-Man.

Bankable franchise writer-duo Christopher Markus, and Stephen McFeely (Captain America: The First Avenger, Thor: The Dark World, Captain America: The Winter Soldier) are back in business, and have even signed a deal for the next two films in the series. Due credit is given to Mark Millar (comic book), Joe Simon and Jack Kirby (characters). Yes, the Markus-McFeely partnership has their hands on the pulse of Marvel Universe aficionados.  Yet, whether they have been able to make this sprawling, expansive foray a comprehensible entertainer is open to debate. Their script has four or five applaud points, and the audience plays along: when Iron Man presses a button to get into his costume mid-flight, when Spiderman is introduced, when Captain America makes a chopper come a cropper, etc. But it becomes predictable and repetitive, when you realise that none of the heroes are going to die (only one gets severely wounded), in spite of the endless banging, flying and spinning overdrive. Even the stand-off between Rogers and Stark, though elaborated in some detail, remains unconvincing.

Two other scenes that make you wonder whether you are missing something are the ones where Stark makes his presentation, and then slips out to encounter a black woman near the elevator. And, pray, why is the villainy so weak in its motivation? Meant to trigger off obedience and a subjugated state in Bucky Barnes, the spell-binding code words are more comic (as in funny) than codey. How did T’Challa, a black African tribal king’s son, gain his flying and combat abilities remains unexplained. Every three scenes, a super-imposed title tells you that you are now in a different city. Titled Captain America, it is as much an Iron Man film.

Brothers in arms, Anthony Russo and Joe Russo (Captain America: The Winter Soldier, Welcome to Collinwood, You, Me and Dupree) love long, wide, comic-book framing, and used the (then) brand new, just launched IMAX 65 camera. They cite The Godfather as their influence in terms of a spread-out canvas and an individual character arc, and Brian De Palma, because, “... he’s so good at tension and empty space.” Cinematography is impressive, in whatever little real-time action there is. Effects are effective too. For a 2 hours 26 minutes film, the punches are just not enough. The directors are indulgent in allotting footage when it comes to Stark and Vision, perhaps over-indulgent. A pulse-pounding opening chase and some webby battles at an airport are well-constructed. Action is generally very well-choreographed.

It will just not be possible to discuss performances in such an all star assembly. It might not serve any purpose either. Yet, a few observations: Chris Evans as Captain America is good-looking, Robert Downey Jr. as Iron Man looks his age and retains his humour, Scarlett Johansson as The Black Widow kicks as always, Sebastian Stan as Bucky Barnes/The Winter Soldier is rugged and full of vigour, Anthony Mackie has a genial presence but Sam Wilson/The Falcon is, pre-ordained, always 10 steps behind the action, Jeremy Renner as the anachronistic archer Clint Barton/Hawkeye has his moments, Chadwick Boseman as T'Challa/Black Panther did research on the cultural aspects of the character and found a regional accent, based on where the fictional Wakanda nation would be! Way to go, Chadwick!

Paul Bettany as Stark’s robot Vision gets to touch emotional chords among his human fans, William Hurt as Secretary of State Thaddeus Ross is still the clever old William Hurt, sympathies also to Elizabeth Olsen (Wanda Maximoff/Scarlet Witch), who is blamed for the deaths of some hospital inmates, collateral damage in her attempt to neutralise Rumlow. German-Spanish actor Daniel Brühl as Helmut Zemo, the Sokovian survivor baddie, is ruthless and maniacal, but needed a better written part. Where have they hidden Paul Rudd (Scott Lang/Ant-Man) in the film? Last, but not the least, Spider-Man! Tom Holland as Peter Parker/Spider-Man, discovered and recruited by Stark, set many a (female?) heart flutter, every time he spun on to the screen, at the press preview in Mumbai. Some webcast, that!

Civil War is a highly exaggerated title. Yet, what do you expect when a bunch of armed and dangerous super-heroes have differences of opinion? “I am not going to take you to the next baseball game!?” But hold on. Armed and dangerous? The law-keepers of the world? Says who? In fact, it would have helped add excitement to the IMAX 3D screens, had they been more armed, and more dangerous.

But then, they wouldn’t remain heroes, would they?

Rating: ***

Trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FkTybqcX-Yo

Pelé-Birth of a Legend, Review: Exciting draw

$
0
0

Pelé-Birth of a Legend, Review: Exciting draw

Whenever a football match begins, all three possibilities are in place: a win for side A, a win for side B or a draw. Wins are exciting, draws not really the desirable result, in the high voltage sport, the most popular game in the world. Pelé-Birth of a Legend, a docu-feature on the Pérola Negra (Black Pearl) of Brazil, promises a lot, delivers much less and results in a draw. To be fair, it is not a tame, goalless draw, but a game that has its moments, scores some goals, and yet leaves you only partially satisfied.

The film restricts itself to about 10 years in the life of the football legend, from his nascent steps to his incredible emergence on the world stage. Edson Arantes ‘Dico’ Nascimento and friends constituted a ragtag team called ‘the shoeless ones’, playing football in the streets and on the rooftops of the local shanty neighbourhood. The name Pelé emerged in school, where he used to pronounce the name of the local Vasco da Gama goalkeeper Bile, one of his idols, as “Pile”. Hence, a classmate of his gave him the sound-alike nickname, Pele. At least that is one version. His father, a former football player, was forced to eke out a living as a toilet cleaner, and his mother too was forced to take on a similar job. She did not appreciate football, since it was a football injury that resulted in bad times for her husband.

Waldemar de Brito, a black talent scout for the famous Santos Football Club, witnessed a game in which Dico displayed his prowess, and offered to recruit him, but his mother would have none of it. When she finally relented, the pathways opened up for the 16 year-old. De Brito explained to him that his raw style could be traced to ‘ginga’--the spirit that flows through the Brazilian martial art of ‘capoeira’, a self-defence practice created by African slaves that was disguised as a dance. Many of the slaves had escaped from their Portuguese masters and hid in the mountainous forest regions. It was there that they developed capoeira. His coach at Santos, Feora, who, like most Brazilians, believed that the humiliating 1950 World Cup loss to Uruguay in the Maracana stadium, was caused by wild, undisciplined football, typified by ginga, tried very hard to get him out of his groove, but ultimately realised that it was a potential weapon that opponents would be unable to counter. The rest is record-breaking football history (read below).

Before the end credits roll, we are reminded that Pele's father once scored five header goals in one game, a feat that Pele was never able to replicate. The most headers Pele ever scored in a game was four.

Brothers Jeff and Michael Zimbalist, known for their Brazil/football-based documentaries Favela Rising and The Two Escobars, have written and directed the biopic, shot entirely in Brazil, with some arresting camerawork by Mathhew Libatique. The early part of the film is slickly edited, credits going to Luis Carballar, Naomi Geraghty, Glen Scantlebury. Kudos to A.R. Rehman, for infusing the right pace and ambience, and eschewing familiar orchestration ploys, for most of the film. For the most part, the narrative follows traditional, familiar and formulaic patterns. A black man in Brazil has to give up football and live in abject poverty; his son takes-up football but has to face humiliation; he is discovered by a talent scout; the coach tries to change his playing style, but fails; he gets severely injured and is dropped from the team; he gets a freak break that gives him a chance to display his uncouth genius; he vindicates his family and his race. Alright, sounds clichéd, but what if it is true? Well, you need to make adaptations and use cinematic licence. That is what they are for. That is what is called screenplay.

Some interesting and heart-warming moments are related to peanuts and mangoes, with the screen time given to the latter equivalent to at least a dozen Alphonsos. We hear a lot about the great humiliation suffered by Brazil at the 1940 World Cup, and that act is a major force in driving the passions and policies of football there, but it is never detailed or explained.

Leonardo Lima Carvalho and Kevin de Paula were cast and the younger and older Pelé following an extensive nationwide search. Both have done a commendable job. Tour de force performances come from Seu Jorge (Seu is abbreviation of Senhor, real-name Jorge Mário da Silva; Brazilian singer, adapted David Bowie’s songs in Portuguese; City of God, The Life Aquatic With Steve Zissou) who plays the father, ‘Dondinho’ João Ramos and Maria Nunes (Blaxploitation: The Black Queen, The Other Side of Paradise, Maresia) as the mother, Celeste Arantes. Both just had to be Brazilian, and are. Vincent Philip D'Onofrio (57, looks it, American actor, producer, and singer; Full Metal Jacket, Men in Black, Jurassic World) plays coach Feola, like a stock character, but with the right accent (most voices are dubbed). Rodrigo Junqueira dos Reis Santoro (Brazilian; Love Actually, 300, 300: Rise of an Empire) impresses with his voice-overs. Don’t miss the cameo by the then 73 year-old Pele himself, seated at a restaurant table, while his younger self runs riot, toppling his milk.  

Shot over eight weeks in 2013, it could not be released in time for the FIFA World Cup 2014, the targeted date, and comes to screens in India some two years later. India is not a football nation, cricket being the fan game and hickey the official sport. Nevertheless, football mania has been catching on in the last two decades, with Goa and Kolkata being major centres. Pelé-Birth of a Legend might perform better at the box office in foot-balling pockets, but might only manage a yellow card elsewhere.

Rating: ** ½

Trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gcN8ZmYyJVY

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pelé

Born in 1940, in Três Corações, Pelé played professionally in Brazil for two decades, winning three World Cups, after which he joined the New York Cosmos. He was named after Thomas Edison, and his nickname was Dico. Pelé’s family moved to the city of Bauru while he was still a young boy.

His father, a great footballer, João Ramos, better known as Dondinho, struggled to earn a living as a soccer player, and gave up soccer after an injury. He was forced to earn a living by cleaning toilets. Pelé developed a rudimentary talent for soccer by kicking a rolled-up sock stuffed with rags around the streets of Bauru.

As an adolescent, Pelé joined a youth football squad, coached by Waldemar de Brito, a great forward himself and a former member of the Brazilian national soccer team, later a Talent Scout for Santos Football Club. De Brito eventually convinced Pelé's family to let the budding phenomenon leave home and try out for the Santos professional soccer club, when he was 15. He scored four goals on his league debut in a match against FC Corinthians on September 7, 1956.

He scored the first professional goal of his career before he turned 16, led the league in goals in his first full season and consequently was recruited to play for the Brazilian national team.

In the 1958 World Cup in Sweden, the 17-year-old, nursing a badly injured leg, scored three goals in a 5-2 semi-final win over France, then netted two more in the finals, a 5-2 dramatic upset win over the favourites, the host country.

Pelé was named FIFA's Player of the Century in 1999, an honour he shared with Argentinean legend Diego Maradona. 


Buddha in a Traffic Jam, Review: Political pottery

$
0
0

Buddha in a Traffic Jam, Review: Political pottery

“If we need to become a strong country and wish to shine, we need thousands and millions of Buddhas who can fight the traffic jam.”

— Vivek Agnihotri, writer-director, to an Indian publication.

He was trying to explain the meaning of the title, which has nothing to do with either Budhha or traffic, but maybe something to do with jam. No, the scene where a man says that he cannot leave the post of the worshipper at a mini-temple that has been around since the times of Gautama, the Buddha, and join the political extremists, does not count and, obviously, I am not referring to jam of the eating variety. Even symbolically, Agnihotri’s protagonist, modelled after his own self, in his student days, is no Gautama, and if he is indeed stuck in a traffic jam, it is because he is in the wrong lane.

Budhha in a Traffic Jam defies definition, and, which is definitely worse, comprehension. Based on true life incidents (there is no way of verifying how many of the dozen-odd incidents in the movie are indeed culled from reality; one can only vouch for a single case), the film tries to piece together a treatise on all that is wrong in (at least major parts of) India in the new millennium, and then frames blinkered views of the vista by polarised thinkers as its spokespersons.

Vikram Pandit (Arunoday Singh) is a happy-go-lucky management student from a business school. He becomes an overnight sensation, after a successful social media campaign against the radical fundamentalism of moral policing, exemplified by an incident where he was present, in which a bar was raided, and girls, particularly one of them (Aanchal Dwivedi) were targetted. Vikram inadvertently gets drawn into a part of a plot that puts his life at risk, and gets entangled between two facets of India--Socialism/Communism, and Capitalism, both of which are deeply rooted in the India of today.

While his own Professor, Ranjan Batki (Anupam Kher), eulogises the virtues of corruption, he is, unbeknownst to Pandit, a leader of the Naxalites, a rural movement of Maoist believers led, in that region, by man with ambivalent values (Gopal K. Singh), and that uses violence as one of its means to battle for its cause. Batki’s wife, Sheetal, meanwhile, believes that making earthen pots and selling them in millions can raise money to help the poor and deprived in the very region. Pandit does not know what to make of the mysterious Charu Siddhu (Mahie Gill). Then, Professor Ranjan Batki throws him a challenge for yet another internet campaign, devising a marketing effort that would help raise money for his wife’s Pottery Club, which has been denied further government funding. Pandit comes up with a brilliant plan, but then all hell breaks loose.

Vivek Agnihotri (Chocolate -Deep Dark Secrets, Dhan Dhana Dhan Goal, and Hate Story, Zid) was a restless student in Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, and later at Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU), New Delhi. He told the media recently, “I was one of those students that would protest and think the unrest will help create a revolution.” But the film was shot at neither of his alma maters. Eighty per cent of it was shot at the Indian School of Business (ISB), Hyderabad, with a huge credit, accompanied by a disclaimer, in the opening credits, to that end. Revealing how the idea of the plot germinated, Agnihotri added, “I was delivering a lecture at ISB and students suggested he make a 10-minute short film, which later developed into a full-fledged feature. They collected the funds.” Rohit Malhotra, who worked with him in all his earlier films, has co-written Buddha.

The film uses a real life incident of moral policing in Mangalore, Karnataka, some years ago, where young girls were beaten up in a pub, and later, they protested under an impromptu pink ‘chaddi’ (underwear/panties) campaign. In the film, the garment is substituted by brassières, and the campaigns renamed the Pink Bra Campaign. Dumping this as just an episode, Buddha then borrows heavily from the raved Ashroonchi Zhali Phule (Tears Turned into Flowers), an award-winning Marathi language play by top Indian playwright Vasant Kanetkar. A very good film adaptation was made in 1966, called Aansoo Ban Gaye Phool (same meaning), starring Ashok Kumar and Deb Mukherji. (Read below).

Prologue and epilogue, chapters and flashbacks, disjointed cutting and long monologues...are they experimenting, or playing a sinking/surfacing/hallucinating/posturing game? Not many 10-minute ideas lend themselves to 115-minute narratives. Buddha is one such example. Repetitive classroom lectures by Batki, singing paeans to corruption, are neither funny nor logical. Noble intentions apart, the entire pottery track works brilliantly as a marketing/advertising exercise (Agnihotri has come to cinema from an A&M background), but in the larger context that it is juxtaposed against, it peters down to jiggery-pokery. Batki’s monologue, delivered to a confrontationist Pandit, walking back and forth, and up and down,  inside a amphitheatre type lecture-hall, comes across as improvised of drama technique, done to impart motion in the constrained space, rather than cinematic ‘taking’ style.

Arunoday Singh (Pizza, Ungli, Mr. X) has an impressive physical presence and is comfortable in both English and Hindi. Mahie Gill (Dev D, Dabangg 1/2, Pan Singh Tomar) is passable, dialogue delivery not being her forté. Anupam Kher has a terribly complex character, with traits that range from strong conviction to downright farce (check out his phone conversations with his father). Most other actors would have earned ridicule, while he gets away with just a rap on the knuckles, for the occasions when he goes over-the-top. And sorry, Anupam, your claim that Buddha in a Traffic Jam “...is the most relevant film of our times,” might not find many takers. Pallavi Joshi is seasoned, and the spouse of Vivek Agnihotri, so no surprise that she is good. Nevertheless, what is true of Kher is also true of Joshi.

Anchal Dwivedi (TV) is the oomphy heroine of the pub club episode, and okay for the part. Gopal K Singh (Company, Page 3, Hate Story), as the Naxal chief, is suitably terrifying and an actor to reckon with. Two other actors deserve mention, only I have failed in all my attempts to get their names. One is the man who plays Nannhe Singh and the other is the female drummer in the pub. The man is naturally sinister and menacing, while the girl, who has a non-speaking part, seems to be a real-life musician who is having a ball.

Buddha pays tribute to the legendary Urdu poet Faiz Ahmed Faiz, and that is laudable.

Now time for some back-story:

*Agnihotri told the media a while ago that India’s Central Board for Film Certification initially wanted to impose 170 cuts before passing the film for release, but later agreed to pass it uncut. Quite incredible, if true!

*They had asked for deletion of the date 26th January because it marks India’s Republic Day, but withdrew that demand. But then why is the date changed to 24th January in many places?

*This is perhaps the first film in history, or, at least in a long time, that has been released without any advertising or publicity whatsoever: no TV, no hoardings (billboards), no press ads.

*Events of the last few months, when aggressive political activity and violence rocked several university campuses across India, have been seen as examples of fact imitating fiction.

*Agnihotri has been promoting his film with screenings in campuses, and under the auspices of various industry bodies.

 Rating: **

Trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gD0arec2IaM

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ashroonchi Zhali Phule

Professor Vidyanand is a morally upright, brilliant professor of mathematics in a college in a town in Maharashtra. He comes across an intransigent student, Lalya, and succeeds in reforming him. Lalya graduates from college and enters the Indian Police Service, as a cadet. Meanwhile, his college is taken over by a local politician, who also has strong criminal links. The politician wants to exploit the college for commercial gain. When Vidyanand resists, the politician subverts Vidyanand's own colleagues, to implicate him falsely under bribery charges.

Vidyanand is removed from his position and is thrown in jail. There, he undergoes a transformation, and comes out a hardened criminal, bent on exacting revenge against those who falsely implicated him. He teams up with his childhood friend turned con-man, Shambhu Mahadev, and puts in motion a plan to defraud the politician who has ruined his life.

In the meantime, Lalya, who is now a senior police officer, is assigned to apprehend Vidyanand. Lalya, oblivious to Vidyanand's transformation, embarks on this mission. Eventually, Vidyanand achieves his revenge, but in the process finds he has lost his moral fibre, and compromised the very values he has stood for. In the end, Vidyanand is apprehended by his protégé, but finds redemption in the fact that his life as a teacher caused his protégé Lalya to reform himself.

Money Monster, Review: Spend on it

$
0
0

Money Monster, Review: Spend on it

Money makes the world go round. It can also drive a man round the bend! Jodie Foster’s financial thriller, Money Monster, juxtaposes TV ratings and credibility with Wall Street stock fixers. It also pitches a John Doe like victim against the establishment, in a battle of wits, and of lives. Heart-rending and irreverent in varying measures, the film is well worth investing your time and money in.

Cable TV’s cocky Wall Street financial guru Lee Gates (George Clooney) hosts a regular show called Money Monster, in which he gives tips to prospective investors.  Less than 24 hours before the film begins, IBIS Global Capital's stock inexplicably plummeted, a phenomenon that was attributed to a glitch in a trading algorithm (computer software equation), costing its investors $800 million. Lee planned to have IBIS’s CEO, Walt Camby (Dominic West) appear for an interview, about the crash, but Camby unexpectedly left for a business trip in Geneva, on his private jet.

Midway through the show, a man carrying some packages and looking like a delivery guy, ambles on to the set, pulls a gun, and takes Gates hostage. He then forces him to put on a vest, laden with explosives, the kind used by suicide bombers. The ‘delivery-man’ is labourer Kyle Budwell (Jack O'Connell), who invested $60,000--his entire wealth, recently inherited from his deceased mother--in IBIS, following a tip from Lee, a month earlier. Kyle was financially wiped out, along with the other investors, and now wants to know who or what was really responsible. Unless he gets satisfactory answers, he threatens to blow up Lee, before killing himself. Once police are notified, they discover that the receiver to the bomb's vest is located over Lee's kidney. The only way to destroy the receiver--and with it, Kyle's leverage--is to shoot, and possibly, kill Lee.

With the help of long-time director Patty Fenn (Julia Roberts), Lee tries to calm Kyle down, and get him some answers. However, Camby is nowhere to be found, and Kyle is not satisfied when both Lee and IBIS Chief Communications Officer, Diane Lester (Caitriona Balfe), promise to reimburse him, even reward him. He, also, is not satisfied by Diane's insistence that the algorithm is indeed to blame. Diane gets suspicious herself, and decides to contact the programmer who created the algorithm, for answers, reaching an IT man in Seoul. The programmer insists that the algorithm is glitch-free, and that someone had to have physically meddled with it for it to go wrong. In the meantime, the police find Kyle's pregnant girl-friend, and allow her to talk to Kyle, through a video feed. When she learns that he lost everything, she viciously berates him, before the police cut the feed. Lee, now taking pity on him, agrees to fully help Kyle discover what went wrong. And all this is happening live, on TV!

Jamie Linden (10 Years, Dear John, We Are Marshall) reportedly wrote the final version. Alan Di Fiore (A Fork in the Road, TV) and Jim Kouf (Rush Hour, Taxi, National Treasure; used two other screen-names) did the first drafts. Most of the events unfold like a stage play, being shot for TV, which, in many ways, it is. Characters are really well-developed, and remain in character. Gates (interesting surname, isn’t it?) is reportedly modelled after real-life stock expert Jim Cramer (read below). Two female parts very creatively delineated: Molly and Diane. Molly’s approach to the drama playing out and Diane’s conscientious and gutsy sleuthing are good examples of competent screen-writing.

Proceedings do get farcical at times, but never so much as to detract from the plot substantially. Stock tip shows are a regular feature in many countries, including India, but I am not aware how many countries insist on statutory warnings/disclaimers being incorporated in all such advertisements and programmes, like India does. Whether such cautioning advisories, like those on cigarette packets, are effectively helpful in protecting bodily health, or financial well-being, can be debated. What is an undisputed fact is that betting and stock investments have ruined millions worldwide, just as they have made millionaires and billionaires of quite a few. Speculative investment as a topic has been hot for centuries, and remains so, in 2016.

Directed by Alicia Christian ‘Jodie’ Foster (53 going on 54), Money Monster is NOT her debut film. Since 1988, she has directed several TV episodes and four features. Foster hasn’t been seen on screen since 2013, when she starred in Elysium, and has said repeatedly that she enjoys directing much more than acting. This 98 min. foray proves why. Except for the exterior shots, of people watching TV in various places, the disjointed shots of other countries (perfectly linked together in the end) and the dull scenes of the long walk in the end, she is in tight command of the unfolding twists. Casting is near perfect, though it would be interesting to know why she picked so many British.  Clooney, just a year-and-a-half her senior, is well-suited, and you can see why he was the first actor she picked. Some of the lesser known players shine as well.

George Clooney (turned 55 last week; Gravity, The Monuments Men, Tomorrowland) has lost none of his charm and gently assertive persona. Julia Roberts (born in Georgia, of English, Irish, Scottish, Welsh, German, and Swedish descent; Mirror Mirror, August: Osage County, Mother’s Day) is tried and trusted material, who can rarely go wrong. A pleasant surprise is Jack O'Connell (mother English, father Irish; 300: Rise of an Empire, '71, Starred Up), who speaks with a slight Irish accent. As the villain who gets footage only towards the end, Dominic West (British; Hannibal Rising, 300, Johnny English Reborn, Genius) keeps both his false exterior and subsequent unmasking underplayed.

Caitriona Balfe (Irish; The Price of Desire, Escape Plan, Now You See Me) will win quite a few fans, and maybe some good roles, after this outing. Cast as a quintessential America cop, and yet far from a hack, is Giancarlo Esposito (Giancarlo Giuseppe Alessandro Esposito, born in Copenhagen, Italian father, African-American mother; Rabbit Hole, Scorch Trials, voice of Akela in Jungle book). As Lenny, the cameraman, willing to risk his life on the job, Lenny Venito (War of the Worlds, men in Black II, St. Vincent) is a natural. Baddie’s ‘yes man’, Dennis Boutsikaris (The Perfect You, Cherry Crush, The Bourne Legacy) looks one and plays the part satisfactorily. Good golly, Miss Molly, Emily Meade (26; Charlie, Trevor and a Girl Savannah , Me Him Her, That Awkward Moment, Gimme Shelter) has some talent going.

Jodie Foster has had a tumultuous life, playing a child prostitute, being stalked by crazed fans, one of whom attempted to assassinate President Ronald Reagan and her various lesbian relationships, including a recent same sex wedding. Let none of it weigh on you as you head for the nearest theatre that is showing Money Monster. Right now, that is the only thing worth taking stock of.

Rating: *** ½

Trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qr_nGAbFkmk                       

Jim Cramer: From the CNBC website

Jim Cramer believes there is always a bull market somewhere, and he wants to help you find it. He is host of CNBC's "Mad Money," (M-F, 6PM ET) featuring lively guest interviews, viewer calls and most important, the unmatched, fiery opinions of Cramer himself. He serves as the viewer's personal guide through the confusing jungle of Wall Street investing—navigating through both opportunities and pitfalls with one goal in mind—to help them make money.

Bilal--A New Breed of Hero, Review: Idol greed v/s rebel breed

$
0
0

Bilal--A New Breed of Hero, Review: Idol greed v/s rebel breed

Here’s the first animation feature film coming out from the middle-east, and it makes you wonder what took them so long. It’s a new, breakthrough breed, and may the genre prosper!

A thousand and four hundred years ago, a slave boy, Bilal bin Rabah, dreamt of becoming a great warrior. Instead, he found himself and his sister working for a wealthy merchant, in a land far away from home. Thrown into a world where idol worship, greed and injustice ruled all, Bilal found the courage to raise his voice, and make a difference. He was led by a mentor and a trainer, who helped him, and prepared him, to stand-up against the greedy merchant army that felt threatened by the awakening of a gullible populace. Inspired by true events, it is a story of a real black hero, who was to become the first ‘muazzin’ (Arabic for the man who calls to prayer, the call being ‘azaan’).

Most of the script had to be the product of cinematic licence, since Bilal lived during 580-640 AD, and the historical records of his life may be sketchy. Also, he is a respected and revered figure, so great care had to be taken while making the narrative interesting, retaining the spiritual aspects of his life. Kudos to Alex Roemer (graduate of Harvard Divinity School, previously served in the U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of Human Rights, lecturer, and documentary film-maker, whose work focuses on religious diversity, and cross-cultural understanding), Michael Wolfe (American poet, author, and frequent lecturer at universities across the United States, including Harvard, Stanford and Princeton; holds a degree in Classics from Wesleyan University), Yassin Kamel (Saudi Arabian, settled in Egypt, now 36, who wrote the film El Alamy at just 25 years of age) and director Khurram H. Alavi himself.

Khurram H. Alavi learnt his basics at the Indus Valley School of Art & Architecture, Karachi, Pakistan. With over 10 years of media experience, Alavi makes his move from advertising to cinema, and this is his directorial debut. Alavi has also served as the resident concept sculptor for characters. Co-director Ayman Jamal, also the producer, is the founder of the banner, Barajoun Entertainment (Dubai). He has extensive expertise in developing and producing media content, branded entertainment, animation and documentaries.

It’s a team that comes good on many fronts: blending the old art of clay animation and cell animation, where one had to shoot 24 frames for each second of footage, with CGI and VFX. Expressive eyes, flashing movements, clashing swords, flashing arrows, good use of birds and animals to create ambience, ornate masks, variety in characters’ girth, and realistic battle scenes, are to their credit. Perhaps the animation is just that wee bit jerky in places and, occasionally, hooves are not grounded when horses gallop. Dream sequences are perhaps one too many. Also, some of the characters look very similar to each other and their voices, too, become difficult to discern. It is still amazing that the film manages to keep the giant of a figure, Bilal’s true lord, out of the proceedings, and, in the end, when Bilal is supposed to do what he has been destined to, the film ends as soon as he opens his mouth. It is sheer technique--leaves you hungry, yet raises no controversies. Bilal features an eleven minute long battle sequence, pitting an army of 300 soldiers against 1000, in an effective use of CGI.

Titles and music are done in Hollywood, mythical battle-tale styles, with great use of various instrument sections, whether brass or strings or rhythms or exotic. Icelander Atli Orvarsson, who specialises in film scores, is the composer. Atli's credits include the Pirates of the Caribbean, Angels and Demons, The Holiday, The Eagle, Vantage Point, Babylon A.D., Thick as Thieves, The Fourth Kind, and Season of the Witch. Together with Hans Zimmer, Orvarsson contributed music to the Zack Snyder Superman re-instalment, Man of Steel. Here, he blends middle-eastern, European and Norse elements. And guess where most of the music was recorded? Abbey Road Studios, London, where legends of more recent centuries worked to create their masterpieces: The Beatles!

The film is slickly edited by Patricia Heneine, except for some parts of the second half, that tend to drag on a bit. It is mixed by Academy-Award winning Michael Hedges (Lord of the Rings, King Kong), in New Zealand, with a team that included some of Sir Peter Jackson’s very own retinue. Costing a relatively modest $30m, Bilal is 105 minutes in length and was made by a team of 360 people, from over 20 nationalities, including many Indians.

Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje (Concussion, Trumbo, Annie Pompeii, Thor: The Dark World) voices the adult Bilal, while Ian McShane (Lancastrian who lives in California; Sexy Beast, Pirates of the Caribbean, Hot Rod) plays Umayya, the cruel slave-driver. Both are understated, unlike some historicals/mythologicals, where the tendency is to go completely overboard. Andre Robinson and Jacob Latimore give their voices to the little Bilal and teen Bilal respectively.   

Bilal’s sister, Ghufaira (teen), is China Anne McClain (she and her sisters Sierra and Lauryn make up the singing group McClain; played Aretha Franklin, Janet Jackson, and Ella Fitzgerald in Disney’s A.N.T.FARM). Adult Ghufaira and Hamama are the vocal contributions of Cynthia Kaye McWilliams. The Lord of Merchants and the Charlatan Priest, Fred, has an uncommon surname, Tatasciore (pronounced Tata-shore), a prolific American voice-actor and former stand-up comedian; the voice of the Hulk in the Ultimate Avengers). Overall, voice performances are of a high standard.

How many animation/CGI films would have a 1400 year-old true story to tell? And how many of them would be without animals and birds talking, or super-powers engaging in over-the-top action? Bilal is refreshingly devoid of familiar trappings, yet consummate in its artistry.

Rating: *** ½

X Men-Apocalypse, Review: X-Men, Ex X-Men, ‘To be’ X-Men, and the 4 Horsemen

$
0
0

X Men-Apocalypse, Review: X-Men, Ex X-Men, ‘To be’ X-Men, and the 4 Horsemen

In the ninth instalment of the X-Man Marvel comics’ series, we are confronted with a devil incarnate villain who lived thousands of years ago in Egypt, and surfaces in the civilised world of 1983. Nobody grovels at his feat in this eon, so he takes great umbrage. He is able to learn English by listening to a TV broadcast just once (if only he would share that technology/software with us humans), and understand how the modern world is governed, by some similar trick. Since he cannot bring back days of ‘past future’, he decides to bring in days of ‘future past’. But there is rider attached: he cannot do what he wants without recruiting four lieutenants, the apocalyptic four horsemen. The film razzles, dazzles and snazzles and its humongous technical spectacle almost casts a spell. A day later, however, it does not remain quite what it appeared to be, you can tell.

Immortal psychic mutant En Sabah Nur rules ancient Egypt, until, when he is in the process of a ritual that will give him immortality, he is betrayed by his worshippers, who now accuse him of being a false God, and cause his huge mansion to collapse, burying him alive. Nur's lieutenants, the Four Horsemen, die protecting and preserving him. A cult continues to worship him in his tomb, and chant before his preserved body, hoping that he will awake one day. He does awake, in 1983, and believing that without his presence humanity has lost its way, he decides to destroy the world, and remake it in his image. He begins by recruiting new Horsemen, starting with the Cairo thief-pickpocket girl, Ororo Munroe.

In East Berlin (cold war days), Raven Darkhölme, investigating an underground fight club, discovers mutant champion Angel, who possesses a pair of large feathered wings on his back, and the Nightcrawler, a tailed mutant who can teleport, engaged in a blood-sport. Raven rescues Nightcrawler, and employs the services of underground black-marketer Caliban, to safely transport him to the US, under a forged passport. When En Sabah Nur then arrives to demand information about strong mutants from Caliban, Caliban's enforcer Psylocke sides with him, and leads him to Angel, whose injured wings Nur replaces with metallic ones. So, he now has three lieutenants.

Meanwhile, Alex Summers takes his teenage younger brother Scott, whose own mutation for shooting optic beams from his eyes is beginning to wreak havoc at school, to Professor Charles Xavier's educational institute, in Westchester County, New York, where Xavier and Hank McCoy will teach him how to control his abilities. Scott meets Xavier's protégé Jean Grey, and the two develop an attraction over the fact that they both cannot fully control their powers. Raven brings Nightcrawler to the institute, and informs Xavier about the threat of En Sabah Nur, leading Xavier and Alex to consult with CIA operative Moira MacTaggert, who has been researching the legend of Nur, in Egypt, to learn more about him.

In Poland, the metal-controlling mutant, Erik Lehnsherr, lives with his new wife and daughter, Nina, but when authorities attempt to capture him for an incident in which he was seen moving metallic objects during earth tremors, his family is killed in the crossfire. En Sabah Nur later approaches the infuriated Erik, and takes him to Auschwitz, Hitler’s concentration camp, where Erik’s parents were killed. There, he upgrades his powers, so that all metal on earth comes under his control. Erik destroys the camp, and joins Sabah Nur, completing his new Four Horsemen.

If anybody knows Stan Lee and Jack Kirby’s X-Men X-Men inside out, it must be director Bryan Singer (Superman Returns, Valkyrie, X-Men: First Class, X-Men: Days of Future Past). This edition has a story by Singer, Michael Dougherty (X2: X Men United, Superman Returns, Trick ’r Treat), Dan Harris (Dougherty’s writing partner), Simon Kinberg (Mr. and Mrs. Smith, X-Men: The Last Stand, X-Men: First Class, Sherlock Holmes) and a screenplay by Simon Kinberg. The four ‘horsemen’ spread this tale far and wide, both in time and space, though Montreal probably doubles for all locations, from East Berlin, to Auschwitz, to Poland to Egypt. And yes, the villain is out to destroy the whole world. Clever little (he turns into a giant towards the end) Nur first ‘Nur’talises the worlds entire nuclear armoury by sending it skywards (was he afraid? Is the devil susceptible to the nukes?) and then begins the decimation of all structures.

The film has too many characters, and settings, and is therefore, just that much long—a solid 144 minutes. There is no sex and hardly any skin show. One word was muted by the Indian censor authorities, who let it pass otherwise untouched. Wolverine gets the expected response he deserves, and his appearance is cleverly restricted. Most characters speak English with British accents (pleasant surprise!), not American, and the departure from the norm, in the shape of Ororo (Egyptian/French/black) and Nightcrawler (German), are good for variety.

A spell-binding beginning sets the pace, but it takes a while to get back to that level. Nur is a villain modelled after the devil, so his need to walk a crowded market upon awakening, as also his need to recruit four mutants to achieve his nefarious goals, is illogical. Climaxes, like all super-hero climaxes, are about a bunch of gifted do-gooders being hurled across the landscape a thousand times and all kind stuff flying around, both solid and as rays. X-Men Apocalypse inventively adds a new dimension of cerebral warfare, with Nur pitted against Charles Xavier’s all penetrative brain. (My own alma mater, (St.) Xavier’s Institute of Communication, might be tickled to find a school for the gifted named Xavier’s School. Some of its alumni are indeed gifted, though not in the manner that Charles’ students are). There is too much dematerialisation/materialisation (Nightcrawler and company), and the visual starbursts cease to surprise you the 50th time. On the other hand, we see very little of Raven’s ability to acquire shapes and forms.

James McAvoy as Charles Xavier/Professor X (the men are his men) is both, the most powerful of the lot, as well as the most vulnerable. For a large part, he is wheel-chair bound. McAvoy is a fine actor. Michael Fassbender as Erik Lehnsherr/Magneto (War) gets as meaty role and great audience sympathy. His turning over to the other side is not very convincing, but that’s the script. Jennifer Lawrence as Raven Darkhölme/Mystique is very easy on the eye. Needed more footage to do justice. Óscar Isaac Hernández Estrada (Sucker Punch, Inside Llewyn Davis, Star wars; The Force Awakens) as Nur, the Apocalypse, possesses psiokinesis, super-strength, technopathy. We don’t see him in the flesh, but his eyes and voice are well-used. Major screen time is allotted to Tye Sheridan as Scott Summers/Cyclops, the school student who discovers that he has the power to shoot beams of strong rays from his eyes, and he does well.

Adequate support comes from Nicholas Hoult as Hank McCoy/Beast, Rose Byrne as Moira MacTaggert (CIA agent and Xavier’s former lover), Sophie Turner as Jean Grey/Phoenix, Olivia Munn as Psylocke/Elizabeth Braddock (Pestilence), Lucas Till as Alex Summers/Havok (Scott’s older brother), Evan Peters as Peter Maximoff/Quicksilver (son of Magneto, who doesn’t know he had a son), Kodi Smit-McPhee as Nightcrawler/Kurt Wagner, Alexandra Shipp as Ororo Munro /Storm (Famine), Ben Hardy as Warren Worthington III/Angel/Archangel (Death), Lana Condor as Jubilation Lee/Jubilee, Josh Helman as William Stryker, a US military officer who hates mutants and Tómas Lemarquis as Caliban (what’s in a name?), a mutant with the ability to sense and track other mutants. Stan Lee and Joanie Lee make cameo appearances. Hugh Jackman, for the while he is there, if huge Jackman. Kodi-Smit McPhee provides some comic relief. Some of these are X-Men, some were X-Men, and some will X-Men.

Who will they make the next villain? Do villains come bigger than the devil? Who the devil knows?

Rating: ***

Trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=COvnHv42T-A

CommunicAsia 2016 Preview 1: Internet of Things (IoT)

$
0
0

CommunicAsia 2016 Preview 1: Internet of Things (IoT)

During CommunicAsia 2016, Singapore, 31 May-02 June, one key area of interest is going to be the Internet of Things (IoT).

2016 Key Topics include

• Architecting Internet of Things - Uncovering Case Studies and Challenges towards Delivery

• Enhancing Security and Privacy While Managing IoT Data Generation in Enterprises

• IoT Integration and Resultant Data Analytics for Smarter Cities

• Developing User Defined IIoT - Best Practices from Large Scale Sector

With Wi-Fi Alliance's announcement of Wi-Fi HaLow--a new standard for products incorporating IEE 802.11 technology, the world is poised to embrace the full potential of IoT-enabled devices. This new standard brings with it greater opportunities for energy savings and longer power connectivity, as nations launch Smart City initiatives.

Communication Service Providers utilise IoT to spearhead Smart City projects by:

• Supporting the major part of Smart City technology solutions with connectivity and data transport services

 • Providing value-added services by leveraging cloud computing and big data analytics

 • Lending their expertise and experience in network management to monitor the performance of the Smart City

These are some of the major exhibitors

Cambium Networks

A scalable solution that's ideal for smart city, government, and industrial applications, cnPilot™ E500 is designed to support wired or rapid wireless deployments. The enterprise-grade access points enable reliable and secure WiFi service rollout for networks managed by either the service provider or enterprise, and even in remote locations. 

Greenwave Systems

AXON is a horizontally designed software platform that translates the communication between various IoT devices into a standardized IP-based language. This allows central control of different connections, protocols and standards via a single platform. The AXON Platform can be operated as a gateway as well as in the cloud, thus making it suitable for the provision of services in the areas of home automation and monitoring, security and surveillance, assisted living and media management. 

Inhand

As a full-featured InRouter series, the InRouter900 supports 3G, 4G LTE, and xDSL technologies with redundant backup solutions, provides easy, uninterrupted Internet access for customers' field devices no matter where they locate. It protects sensitive business data by building encrypted VPN tunnels, and ensures communication reliability with multi-layer detection and auto-recovery technologies. 

Otsaw

SwitchBee offers the freedom to control all home lighting and electrical appliances, in an easy-to-use, affordable way. The patented wireless technology removes the need for batteries or a neutral wire for a seamless fit with any type of wall switch or housing - making Installation simple and avoiding unwanted rewiring. Using SwitchBee, convert a wall switch into a smart switch in less than two minutes.   

Viewing all 1037 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>